Lyndon Larouche is unreliable.

No fan of Obama but this guy is a bit of a crank IMHO.

mikey mikey wrote:
+9999999999999999999999999999999

The guy is whacko, has some real whacko followers too. He's probably in his own way even more whacko than Alex Jones and that takes some doing.

mikey mikey wrote:
Fixed mate.

I'd never heard of him before. It seems he's not held in high esteem.

i went looking earlier for documentation to back this video up... i've yet to find any given i didnt try very hard, just google

The only thing looking 'unusual' is Obama's schedule is blank, where his activities are normally published. That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the vid contents.

Gilly wrote:
Wait til you see his british empire NWO speech

In Gilly's defense, he tries very hard to pass himself off as legitimate and he has an army of internet drones shilling his message (remember "Stomp" at DIF)?

Not your fault Gilly: we would all like impeachements of polticos starting with Cheney but that is about as likely as LaRouche not naming his movement after..er.. himself or his drones lisetning to facts and reasonable arguments.

feather wrote: It isn't often somebody asks me to tone up my language.

andyh wrote:
I am sure RA will get round to posting the vid (w/ no coments) it sometime soon.

Well if you noticed, I didn't risk any woops of glee when posting that vid.

I don't know whether this is relevant or not, because tbh, even with reading spec's on, I can't see it!



And now I've no idea what's going on! I've posted a You tube link, which once submitted is completely invisible to me. Went into edit to paste it again, but in edit, you can see it's still there.

Gilly wrote:
post the link as a url using [/url] and see if that works. At least we can C&P it ourselves

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=S0I5qYCK66I

thanks Gillly.

While it makes for intersting readin, the indictment remains, as yet, unsigned. And is highly likely to remain so. I believe that this may be wishful thinking on the part of Obama opponents.

Thanks - I was going from the title, and can't see the text clearly enough to read it at all, even zoomed in.

mikey mikey wrote:
Sais who you,
your opinion is not valid period stop spouting shite and just shut the FUCK UP

I admit to getting slightly wet after seeing the threat title...
The highs & lows of bathos..