entrangermercenary1 wrote:
andyh wrote:
entrangermercenary1 wrote:
psketti wrote:
You're missing the point

No the point is made well. Anarchy is what ?
I thought it was no government, no authority, and the people making decisions for the good of the community ?
.......... wrote:
That video is exactly what Anarchy is by definition.
The village takes the law into their own hands.
The cops just stand back and watch.

Yes your correct, people seem to forget about the real life issues when quoting some fluffy ideology.

Sigh...
Anarchy is all about the complete lack of NEED for external governance.
One of these days these idiots will get it

So there will be no mobs in this anarchist heaven then

Everybody will have all the food they require, all the housing they require, clothes, shoes, play stations, TVs blah blah blah.
So if somebody does not want to work what happens ? If somebody takes a sickie, goes out on the lash, what happens ?
What does the sentence say?
'Anarchy is all about the complete lack of NEED for external governance'
Anarchy is rule of one. Self control.
The fact that you're incapable of envisioning it does not infer that it is impossible anymore than MOST people cannot envision splitting an atom. Indeed...not that long ago no-one knew what an atom was.
Anarchism is a mindset for social engineering TOWARDS such a goal scenario whereby external governance is no longer needed.
It is not a movement for flicking a lightswitch to create 'utopia' or other such bollocks.
Oi's reply was intended to show that authority has hardly tackled the problem which remains, you cannot come from a position which addresses nothing and is practically tested out and proven to do nothing...to then state that it is superior to a position that is as yet untested and theoretical and only intended to be an IMPROVEMENT TOWARDS a better scenario.
Such is the mindset of the double digit IQ daily mail reader.