I think he's an ex-DiF member called something like Gorilla99.

Ahh gorilla99 or whatever he went by I remember that loony tune rofl!!

Gilly wrote: You've obviously got a good memory!

Bear in mind, when he was in court, it was his defence saying he had a serious psychiatric condition!
andyh wrote: I've obviously missed out on this guy! I clearly came to the DIF too late in the day....

oioioi wrote:
I just changed my mind back from false flag to not a conspiracy.

But i don't understand why the killers would wait 15-20 minutes for the cops to come and kill them.

Yet i also don't understand how this would change anything, so i see no point or agenda in a false flag.

I'm on the fence right now waiting to hear the emotion from the victims friends and family because that can't be photoshopped.

The eyewitnesses hold all the answers right now because only so much can be faked...

Just watched the 1st few seconds of that vid Oi, and straight away I see there's blood on his hands - yet none on the street!!!

Gilly wrote:

Okay, that is interesting. Compare the two:

That is certainly interesting, if you look near the left front wheel of the car it looks like there might be some blood, but in the aerial photograph, the blood is all on the far side of the posts that the car struck, which would appear to be completely bloodless in the video.

wake_up_bomb wrote:
Granted, but specifically in the two shots above. What would be the motivation for removing the blood from the pavement where that bloke was standing? I completely understand what your saying though.

It just seems more likely to be the other way around to me.

Also, those stains didn't appear to be visible in many of the vids of the other chap stating his reasons for the murder either. I'll have another butchers.

Also, does anyone know where the 'beheaded' part of this story came from? Have we established if he actually was or wasn't? This would put my mind at rest re the woman in grey sitting beside him and stroking his back.

EDIT: You addressed the blood on the street issue as I was typing.

Gilly wrote:
You cant see the blood near his feet? look close...

Can I ask then what people are making of this?

I'm reading there was a women with a trolley who dissappeared and blood on hands but no blood on the road then a women comforting a corspe

Are people thinking this is not real then? I'm asking because there is footage of this all over the place so surely it happen? Or is it an elborate trick?

That Sun vid was filmed by someone alighting a bus, wasn't it? Where are all the passengers/driver? They would have had a pretty good view of everything.

Space Bandit wrote:
The dead guy is in the background, the 2 attackers being 'detained' are in the foreground.

.......... wrote:
You can see it, but now look at the aerial shot. There is much MORE blood that has appeared there, apparently well after the injured/dead man is in the road.

.......... wrote:
No. There's a mark on the pavement, which could be anything - but I definitely don't see that great swathe of blood as per the other shot.

Do you?

Gilly wrote:
The daily hate mail are having a field day lol.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2329458...ghtered-soldier.html

Apparently he was 'nearly' beheaded and the woman was just squatting to pray for him for a few seconds.

Again all the pics show no blood trail in the same location as the aerial pics.

That recent video above is much better btw, inc the granny strolling past lol.
Thats the video that ought to have been released and shown first.

Ab Origine wrote:
look again the blood matches up perfect with the aerial shot...

oioioi wrote:
The dead guy is in the background, the 2 attackers being 'detained' are in the foreground.[/quote]

I'll need to look again then,because I took the dead one to be the one on the left of screen, in the road, and the other 2 to be right next to each other, right of screen.

.......... wrote:
Are you taking the piss?

Look at his left foot. Now look at the aerial shot. Admittedly, the front-on shot could just be very poor quality but if the two images were consistent, his left foot would be roughly right in the large section of blood above the three streaks visible in the aerial shot.

Regardless of where blood appears to have vanished/appeared, there doesn't appear to be a drop nvm a trail between where the body is attacked to where it is dragged into the road.

andyh wrote:
They had to cut out the part where the killer apologizes and says it was an eye for and eye for what British soldiers have done.

Here is the area of the pavement in two images, this was the best I could do it with Paint and my limited skills!

I would find it very hard to explain that away. From a timeline point-of-view, it simply makes no sense.