British MPs have voted to reject possible military action against the Assad regime in Syria to deter the use of chemical weapons.

A government motion was defeated by 285 to 272, a majority of 13 votes.

Prime Minster David Cameron said it was clear Parliament does not want action and "the government will act accordingly".

It effectively rules out British involvement in any US-led strikes against the Assad regime.

And it comes as a potential blow to the authority of Mr Cameron, who had already watered down a government motion proposing military action, in response to the opposition Labour Party's demands for more evidence of Assad's guilt.

Labour had seen its own amendment - calling for "compelling" evidence - rejected by MPs by 114 votes.

PM 'disappointed'
But - in an unexpected turn of events - MPs also rejected the government's motion in support of military action in Syria if it was supported by evidence from United Nations weapons inspectors, who are investigating claims President Bashar al-Assad's regime had used chemical weapons against civilians.

Defence Secretary Philip Hammond confirmed that Britain would not be involved in any military action against the Assad regime - but said it would probably go ahead in any case.

"I expect that the US and other countries will continue to look at responses to the chemical attack.

"They will be disappointed that Britain will not be involved. I don't expect that the lack of British participation will stop any action."

He said he and the prime minister were "disappointed" with the result of the Commons vote which he said would harm Britain's relationship with Washington.

"It's certainly going to place some strain on the special relationship.

"The Americans understand the Parliamentary process. Perhaps they have been surprised by the scale of opposition."

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23892783

ent, #15, sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...ck.html?limitstart=0 now wind yer neck in.

ent, #15, sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...ck.html?limitstart=0 now wind yer neck in.

entrangermercenary1 wrote: Well, mate, if someone (a) is warned by the moderators for making racist remarks (which oi will confirm, I have no doubt), (b) continually espouses (that means offers vociferous support, just in case you don’t know what it means) the EDL, and (c) boasts about knowing the inner workings of Combat 18:
...you might not unreasonably come to the conclusion that person is racist!
.

entrangermercenary1 wrote: Are you saying that Richard Dannatt is wrong? Perhaps he's not entitled to an opinion! After all, he's only been employed in the most senior position in the British Army, whereas you're obviously more qualified to comment!

As for racism, if you make racist posts, strongly support the EDL, and boast about having intimate knowledge of C18, then you are a racist. You may not understand that you're a racist, but it doesn't change the fact that you are. Any reasonable person will draw that conclusion. The only people who won't are other NaNs who also reserve the right to make racist remarks, but then kick and scream like babies when you call them what they are. That's what you are, whether you like it or not.

By just 13 people aye merc.
Hardly 'working' IMHO, should've been an easy 100+ majority on that issue.

272 puppets in there.

Can we get a list of names and how they voted?

andyh wrote:
Just no winning with you is there. The vote was NO...if thats by 1 or 200 its NO...or now do you want to bring in the NO vote must be at least over 100 or it would be a yes vote ?

Be careful what you wish for

Just no winning with you is there. The vote was NO...if thats by 1 or 200 its NO...or now do you want to bring in the NO vote must be at least over 100 or it would be a yes vote ?

See wrong again as fucking usual So are you saying that there is no civil war currently happening in Syria ??

Im sure your familiar with the phrase " Donkeys leading lions" Thats why I only employ upto Majors who have worked the way through the ranks into my organisation It also seems you now choose to beleive a retired General because he is in the GUARDIAN ...SO ex military pesonnel do speak the truth

So again put the rascist posts up !!! As you keep every post of mine should not be to difficult should it wubwub

EDL i STRONGLY Support do I ? Well they do have some good points along with other groups

But here is the big fat fucking point your missing wubwub....I fought with the Muslim Brigades in Bosnia oh dear

Are you a banker ? Because you seem to claim to have intimate knowledge of the world banking system, how it works, how its ripping everybody off, blah blah blah...so you must be a wanker...errrr i mean banker.
HUMINT about different organisations .

As for drawing conclusions, yes connect the dots...oh dear ickey syndrome...nil point

NANs... Bet you call Man UTD manure and Chelsea Chelski ffs

Keep connecting the dots, im sure there is another book in it somewhere...sounds familiar that though

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Careful what I wish for?

A government full of people with decent common sense? lol, yeah that would be scary wouldn't it.

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/g...n-syria-8789496.html

^Gotta laugh at the language used here. Puppet didn't do as he was told, bad puppet.