I certainly have no wish to see you 'fuck off' oi - my suggestion would be to simply not respond - both parties have presented their sides of the story - and I am sure that we have all come to our own conclusions over it all - Neither side is going to get the resolution they desire - or change the others mind about their point of view - so further arguing is a waste of energy and effort.

I sincerely thank dg for all he has done for this place and appreciate all the work oi has put into it - I would think that the decent and respectful thing to do would be for both admins to agree to remove any threads that are disparaging of each place and endeavor to not allow them to spring up again. Wipe the slate clean with a common goal - to build up our respective forums without interference from eachother merely positive contributions.

the agression was one sided: fact and i have the proof

diamondgeezer wrote: I called a vote on whether a member should be banned or not, the community was indecisive.
That indicated to me that any moderation call in the future was likely to be a fight with around 50% of the community.
That to me is an unworkable system and intolerable if you're the mug trying to make it work.
So I chucked it.

mikey mikey wrote:
I'll overlook the royal 'we' to agree with the sentiment.

Another valid point that will be swerved.

Pure projection, he's out to destroy SZ, whether he knows it or not.

.......... wrote:
Yep RA....in fact (apart from my neighbours on the left who are Chinese) everyone on the whole street are asian/pakistani/muslim.

& they are great neighbours, keep themselves to themselves, and don't come round to mine asking to borrow a cup of sugar or a pint of milk or whatever, just the way I like it..

We just see each other in the street & say hello, all good...

oioioi wrote:
Absolute bollocks.

See, now both 'sides' have sought to draw a member - Feather, who's expressed a desire to see this battle end - into the fight on their side. Does anyone not see that as manipulation?

Even if there's a point to be won, why do that? It's not good. Let it go.

mikey why cant you just let oioioi & DG argue this out?

People here were talking shit about irre in the rant section but i'm not going to Prntscr it, you understand.

Here's my solution feather:

DG states explicitly what he seeks to gain from popping up here from time to time having a dig on the 'structure'. (without sounding like a cunt) and we (me and him) seek a resolution with mediation.

I stop signing in in order to preserve the forum (making me the hero and him the cunt) if he stopped signing in, which even if he said it holds no stock.

Or he stops being a troll and we get on with what we were getting on with.

diamondgeezer wrote:
Well the place bobs along nicely until you decide to pop up and rattle the same unsubstantiated cage.

Not my view.

The view of anyone with half a fucking house brick for a brain who has observed your most recent posts.

oioioi wrote:
I'm trying my best to keep out of this tonight but fuck that for a solution to anything.

Gilly wrote:
Please let me know how I can casually dismiss regular fuckin trollin on my character and I'll happily do it, until then I'll stand up for myself and the forum.

diamondgeezer wrote:
TBH that is not what it looks like: if I am wrong, ok. Just do TZ that you want o do. But the posts on the rant indicate that is not what you wish.

You wish to put SZ right? But that means you want to change what is going on here and part from this crap and a few trolls over from DF its going well.

Not as you would have hoped? Well that's life.

You have yours and we have ours.

Would you like me to C&P this crap over to TZ.

Even THAT traffic is damaging, riight

For the Love of Light let it go.

I think it is brilliant you want to contribute here. But is that what you are aiming for.

My exposition suggests not.

Look hard and listen with the ear of your heart.

Are you really doing the right thing here?

After all you did to help set this up.

Snap out of it.

oioioi wrote:
As I made clear from the outset, my original posts tonight were responses to your false accusations made against myself.

And that's exactly what they were, as I quite clearly proved, with quotes/links.

Look, everybody else here, the reasonable ones left....just read the thread. Simples

oioioi wrote:
Truth is, I would too. It's easier to see the best thing to do when you're not one of the involved parties.

diamondgeezer wrote:
So what is going on with you living in a Muslim neighborhood and why was it brought up?

.......... wrote:
Because DG came with a few people and my posts and screenshots proved that.

Would you stand aside whil a friend gets mobbed?

psketti wrote:
why did oioioi say that?

.......... wrote:
Fuck knows why it was brought up.

Thanks Gilly: this has been an orchestrated attack on one of our hardest woring and moost comitted members.

It is, in fact, a fkn disgrce

Hands up who doesn't love oi