On behalf of everyone at SZ I hope you accept our sincerest apologies for the DIF censorship you've suffered.

Alex jones is full of shit
And so are you.

Web bots have failed time and time again, a fact you seem in constant denial of.

Your a racist plain and simple, when your views on such matters seeped out its clear you are not talking about just differences but racial supremacy.

But I find your post here better, must be a good influence.

I don't really see the point in obsessing about the racial differences of the red race if we're all doomed anyway.
Shouldn't we be more concerned about the impeding doom?
The sky is crumbling.
The air is vanishing.
The moon is being eaten causing it to whirl out of orbit.
The floor is fucked.
Gravity is running out.
The oceans are taking off.
Clouds of nuclear dust permeate every single nostril.
....but you're bothered about red people!

Gilly wrote:
I really wan't going to log in tonight....but ffs I DIDN'T say that! Please don't misquote me!

This is what I actually said....

You see the difference there right?

You hold NaN's and the SZ 'management' in equal esteem.

I've clearly gone up in your estimations lately.

I said that slagging people off on a forum they aren't members of & therefore can't defend themselves on is, imo, depicable & cowardly.

I also said that the management of a forum that allows/encourages such behaviour are just as bad as the people on the forum doing the slagging.

Quite Simple Really,

No - tell me what the difference is. You said the management were no no better than the NAN's. No matter what justification you put with the judgment, you said it, and now you've quoted it, which proves that you said it. And along with BC ripping round with a personally abusive signature, that was what made me decide not to bother with TZ any more.

*Edit* on reflection, it could be interpreted as calling them despicably cowardly, rather than as bad as NANs. It's ambiguous. But either way, it contradicts your assertion earlier on here that you don't allow people from here to be slagged off over there. You don't just allow it, you do it yourself.

Gilly wrote:
No I didn't, clearly. What I said was THAT THE MANAGEMENT ARE NO BETTER THAN THE PEOPLE DOING THE SLAGGING OFF OFF OF THE ''NANS''! CLEARLY!

&, for the record, BC's comment about yourself in his sig on TZ was promptly removed as soon as it was spotted. In fact, I think he even left because we removed it.

Why do people like posting stuff from other forums here?

diamondgeezer wrote:
You'd posted this as I was editing my post above.

Any way, I'm very tired & up at 6am, and you're really getting on my tits, so I'm off to bed. Good night.

diamondgeezer wrote:
I see now, you were actually saying SZ members are as bad as SZ management, in your defense of NaNs, for expressing their(SZers) negative views of NaNs.

Glad we cleared that up.

Best forum on the net, innit?

And having let the dogs out for a piddle, they've buggered off through a hole in the hedge, so I'm up till I hear them barking to come back in!

And unless I'm mistaken none of the SZ 'management' are members on TZ so I'm surprised you feel comfortable quoting such a slur aimed at them when none of them could possibly defend themselves.

Back of the net!

Gilly wrote:
No I dont, fact. No-one from here (or any other forum) is allowed to be slagged off by name on TZ, & I challenge you to prove differently.

oioioi wrote:
Incorrect, jhado is.

diamondgeezer wrote:
They CAN come here - nobody is stopping them. Resistance was here recently. All they have to do is sign up. And nobody says anything about them here that wasn't said to them directly 100 times on the DIF in full technicolour glory. Crikey - you even mentioned tinyint - have you really forgotten just how batshit insane he is?!?

David Cameron isn't a member of this forum - should we all la\y off him too?

Geez DG - haven't you got anything better to do than worry about people being rude about Nazis on the internet?

diamondgeezer wrote:
You're surely not going to say 'by name' matters, when you're specifically slagging members en masse and 'the management'! Give it up DG.

We not touching my post before that?

.