Merry Xmas

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25514687

yep, religion again, the reason for most wars, that and oil of course, just ask Tony B.Liar and George Wanker Bush.

Can't everybody just have a day off doing this shit..... & then look at doing it permanently.
ffs.

Yeah, fellas. Just once a year, knock it off for a day, eh?

only if you do the same!!! wanna call a truce??

Bomb attacks and gun attacks on the general public in any country are always done by groups linked to security services and the military.

There are virtually no independent armed groups that are not linked to the above.

The reason that you can be sure of this is that people who get injured and killed are always at the bottom of the pyramid and never at the top.

If you got rid of the security services and military (bankers little joey's) in all countries all the mayhem would stop.

Northern Ireland is a good example where terrorism and drug dealing was sponsored by the military/security services.

A truce for today? Sure.

Would that be in the spirit of Christmas?

I am touched by that as I am for the genuine concern for the fate of Christians in Iraq.

I am not concerned for the plight of Christians anywhere as I am not one myself, its just yet another religion to me. but in the spirit of the season I am willing to call a truce, in any case I'm going offline soon to watch Paul O'Grady and the doggies!!

Moo.

moo??? silly old cow!

Nope, not fake.

oioioi wrote:
I know
mikey mikey wrote: lonewolf wrote:
OTOH my concerns are not limited to non-Christians. Or Christians for that matter.

So enjoy the rest of your holiday, be you atheist, agnostic, Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jewish etcetera.

I used to think I was agnostic but now I just don't know.

re: that BNP White Xmas Card story in the independent...

A few choice NaN-comments from the comments section of The Independent.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/f...gs-card-9022775.html

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Back on topic:

@ the Hawks: Well fucking done!

Yesterday, on it's mobile news page, the bbc had this story sitting right next to a story about the arch bishop of canterbury calling for tolerance toward christians overseas.

There's only one sane reaction to that 'coincidence'.
It goes like this:

Actually that is just spin and distraction by the Beeb. And a few other MSM divide and conquer machines.

They're are trying to re-edit the speech into Muslims vs Christians when it is nothing of the sort. He mentioned Palestine before the ME Christians and the majority of the speech was anti-greed.

Read for yourselves.
news.uk.msn.com/archbishop-highlights-injustice

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
An early Christmas present from right-wing Christians in the USA to Muslims in Yemen.

rt.com/news/yemen-strike-drone-wedding-161/
Drone strike kills 15 'wedding party-goers' in Yemen

@hugorune

I see where you are coming from but I think that you are falling into the bloodthirsty OP's trap: i.e. Xtian vs Muslim.

I know that you were showing his post up for the hypocrisy that it is, but irony and subtlety is lost on this person.

As I am sure you are aware, the right wing Christians that support the drone attacks fail to represent Christianity just as Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism and even Atheism is misrepresented.

I know that I have posted that a dozen times before but that is because despite proving that neither Christianity nor Islam is represented by these conflicts, people like Merc will not stop with is BS. He is aware that repetition is the key from turning lies into "truth".

He mastered "double-think" years ago and can support the notion of retribution for the killings of Christians while not acknowledging that this attack was a retribution for the attacks on muslims. Other people have pointed out this glaring fact in similar cases as you have but this has been met with accusations of "justifying" or "siding with" the muslims and the terrorists.

Read more: www.ncregister.com/daily-news/u.s.-drone...ishop/#ixzz2ofcdhvwH

Of course, the truth is that none of these attacks can be justified and only serve to encourage more attacks.

The only winners are those that seek to continue the conflict for reasons of their own.

Some need the areas de-stabilised, others profit from the conflicts in arms and resources and contracts, and others just thrive on hate, death and destruction.

mikey mikey wrote:


I should know better (slaps own hand) but I couldn't help it.