Panther wrote: *starts looking for an old wheel centre cap and a hairgrip*

Refugee wrote:
i'm all out of emocions


bitting my lip


bwahahahaha

I'm still "inactive". I was hoping to be upgraded to full blown banned today.

oioioi wrote:
By 'long answer' I didn't mean 'a long reply' - simply a few details of where to post etc without pissing off people who are already here (the very last thing most of us newbies want I'm sure after such a beautiful welcome from you all ).

Cheers!

electricdreams wrote:
If needs be a dedicated sub-forum can be created.

BTW, thrashing out the details of that 'if' is a part of the SZ experience!

oioioi wrote:
Hopefully, we'll reach a con......




Oh wait......hang on a mo..........

I think those of us banned, suspended or deactivated should rejoice in the fact that the DIfmods have so much time to monitor 3rd party websites - only because a huge % of the remaining DIF posters are socks and stooges - so no mod censorship is required.

Remember?

I had a good nose about before I left DIF at the members stats. (yep I am that sad )
As of last weekend:

90,029 members.
63,601 of those members have never posted. Not once.
10,403 more of them haven't ever posted more than 8 times.
3,907 members in total posted there in 2013.

They're racking up over 1,000 new members each month, yet at least 90% of them never post. Some days a third or more of these newly created posters who never post were premium members too.

oioioi wrote:
Cheers for that - much appreciated

Refugee wrote:
it looks increasing more and more like people with thought processes that are independent of Icke's are here, so there are those there that are there because .... of fuck it I've said there too many times.....

electricdreams wrote:
See that's fucking respect that is By gosh we've got some good folk come through the doors of late. Big up yourself ed

my suggestion for what it is worth in regards to where to post stuff such as that from the js and csa threads would be the following...

Create a sub forum that is members only - that way it will allow more than one thread for ease of viewing and by making it private we are going some way to protecting ourselves if people begin making allegations with dubious evidence. I would also suggest that a couple more facilitators are voted in to facilitate that sub forum specifically - again because it is an emotive subject and because we do need to protect the forum - particularly if as I suspect it is being monitored by people who would love any excuse to shut it down

Nah Dopey.... you must be wrong! The Ike said he had 1,000,000 members in the forum! But they weren't donating to his special TV channel. (If you recall, he got very cross with his non-donators - from his thousands of forum followers who dared to log into his forum every month)

Surely the Seany Boy wouldn't lie to Ikey Daddy would he? David Icke probably doesn't have a clue - he is just fed figures.

Sean: "We have 1,000,000 members Daddy Icke. If they all give £1 you can buy me my TV station".
Icke: "I'll get you your TV station, but you have to share it with Gareth"

No never - that couldn't be possible....surely......

Now the truth is out!

Dopey wrote:
What's it take for a person to get banned from that trollpit? I'll find out when my suspension's lifted.

Dopey wrote:
My friend has a bigger forum (by general activity i.e. hits, and active membership). I have never asked him but most of the accounts there were (and still are) dummy ones too. Mostly created many years ago (from when it started until 2004/5 when it really took off) - since then it's turned a modest profit (a couple of thou a year - nothing compared to the time and effort he sinks in still - he's on 24/7 call for it ). It's done for the love of the subject, not money and - go figure! - no more recently created dummy accounts!

All these fake sock accounts on forums are just for Google etc revenue imo. Apart from on DIF where they are also bought into play when Sean/David/etc need a new voice to back them up.

Btw my friend's forum has an unlimited PM limit per day (sending) and 5000 inbox, and the costs for that are comparatively negligible for his server space. On DIF you get to send 10 PMs within 24 hours and an inbox limit of two hundred - and Sean tried to argue with me once (on forum) that that's where the costs were, and it was nothing to do with trying to force people to pay for premier membership to raise those ridiculous restrictions (that I have never seen anywhere else on the tens of forums I've been a member of - going back to dial-up server days).

hate to be pedantic but I am sure it was page views per month or summat not members - I can well believe that dif gets that many page views - many is the time I have refreshed repeatedly just to see if the shit I have just read was actually there or just a figment of my imagination.

Page views however as icke is discovering does not equate to people willing to donate - nor do likes on a facebook page basing advertising projections and costings on that sort of information was schoolboy simple imho.

My blog received something like 5000 visitors last year and only has one blog post on it - and not a very interesting one at that.

@troy
Well I obviously didn't litter my reply to Shanti with enough F's. I wish I'd stuck a couple of C's in there now too.

Troyhand wrote:
Just call Sean a cunt, that should do the trick. It worked for me.

electricdreams wrote:
Dubs will hate me for quoting quoters but:

We've coped so far with unlimited Private messaging, mainly because we argue the toss publicly I suspect.