irrepressible wrote:
I can’t share your opinion about I_am. I agree about sean but he doesn’t deserve my time to talk about him.

It feels so good to talk openly about them…….

Universe is fair......what goes around comes around.....

ftil wrote:
That's the best thing about this place, being able to openly slag off the mods(sketti actively encourages it, try it, abuse her)...being able to slag off dif mods is just a fringe benefit.

Totally true. I have no idea why religion and race threads dominate the forum. What does it have anything to do with icke message?

Edit: this was supposed to be in reply to whoever said that the forum is hardly about icke or his work. Not sure how to quote yet....

ftil wrote:
I talk openly to them...a bit too openly in Sean's case *Must remember to count to 10*

I vehemently disagree with how all this has been handled, the mass bannings, etc. I've told them as well. The thing I have to say about i_am though, is that she's heard me out. With Sean, the conversation/debate doesn't seem to last very long

I don't know/care who banned is but whoever it is if I was sean I'd be highly suspicious of anyone trying THAT hard to curry favour.

I'm gonna be going over there tonight and leaving a check out notice with a nice little in your face public message to the admin team daring them to delete the post and prove that free speech is not allowed... anyone who has been banned, inactivated, or had posting privileges revoked got anything they would like passed along? (sign it if you wish or leave it as anonymous)

oioioi wrote:

oioioi wrote:
Yeah I agree.

diamondgeezer wrote:
I missed that!

oioioi wrote:
It is so freeing to express what we think and feel.
I am laughing about conspiracy forums as the censorship and control is beyond measure.
It is a joke, but luckily, people are waking up and they don’t want to be active there.

oioioi wrote:

diamondgeezer wrote:
The lulz are strong with this one

StarsChildren wrote:
cant think of owt i havent said here - it sounds trite but at this point all I can think of is good luck and take care to those members whos' posts I enjoyed reading. I didnt get a chance to say it myself.

thoreau wrote:
Will do. And that is not a bad idea, to wish luck to those posters who made DIF interesting and worth reading part of the time.

StarsChildren wrote:
Its not my business- But why make things worse and get yourself banned?

I like the DI forum and never have had such fun reading batshit crazy posts alongside intellectual debate... I wish this issue could be resolved and you guys continue to post there.

I'd still be posting there if I hadn't have been made inactive. I sound like a stuck record but I was inactivated for a pathetically stupid reason or two.

Then I blew up on sean and asked to be banned. It's ridiculous and infuriating.

Sorry banned (I see you lurking) have your chips back...




...I think I got most of my piss off them for you.

psketti wrote:
I say let him/her stay. He/she will soon tire him/herself out and will leave of their own volition. Not to mention talk themselves into a deep hole of circular nonsense that only Jesus or Homer Simpson would be able to get them out of, ought to be quite entertaining!!

irrepressible wrote:
Email him and agree not to post links here.

Sean isnt a bad guy (at least hes been fair to me) he is just trying for damage control. Personally, I dont understand alot of this but I know Sean was attacked pretty hard by certain people here in another thread and it probably hurt him a bit and pissed him off.

I just think EVERYONE involved has blown this way out of proportion.

Bluegrazz wrote:
I already did that bluegrazz, but he still inactivated me. I gave both him and i_am my word that I wouldn't PM the link, and I kept my word.
He inactivated me for being a moderator here. He even said "you did nothing wrong on the DIF". It's a huge injustice. When he said he inactivated me, I blew up and called him a cunt and a prick and demanded to be banned.

It's shit really.