dubmeup wrote:
Hardly. It's been pissing down, hail, rain and gale force winds. I went out with the dog earlier and even he couldn't wait to get back indoors.

Don't talk to me about fucking wind. I was doing a gable end today about 35 foot up. It wasn't a particularly strong base wind today but the gusts were awesome and kept smacking the cradle into the building. That aint good for many reasons. If we weren't so far behind on workload i'd never have done it.
The van roof felt like it was gonna peel off last night and i swear we lifted off a few times......

Hellish.


Edit: oh yeah. You and mikey. I invoke the sz clean slate clause. Which i don't think you two have ever given each other....

Founding principle of the place after all chaps....

mikey mikey wrote:
No mikey, again that's your words and not mine. I said YOU are lying about everybody who comes here gets banned. There's plenty of people here that also post at the DI forums. The difference is, some of us aren't on a deliberate mission to trash forums or attack other people for expressing an opinion, , unlike you and your little band of subversive gate keepers and forum wreckers.

mikey mikey wrote: No Mikey, not accurate.
I agreed with the [I'm guessing a jokey/ironic sense] premis of oioioi's post that
Don't start this shit Mikey:
I'm asking you now - don't assume anything - and certainly don't tell me the context behind what I write.

Darkmoon wrote:
So when I say that people are banned for joining here, I'm lying.

But when the OP says it, Gilly says it twice and half a dozen other people say it, they're not lying?
Darkmoon wrote:
Is that the same as the "little band of ''half truthers'' "or the "nasty little band of shit stirrers and cave trolls."? (see quote above)

Who are these people, exactly?

Darkmoon wrote:
May I ask, who's in this 'band' other than mikey?

Weeman wrote:
Well, weeman, I certainly apologise for having misunderstood what you meant by "He's right" but I can assure that it was not my intention to misrepresent you.

I don't believe I attempted to tell you the context behind what you write

I would always allow you to clarify your position on whether you believe the posters (including the OP) that people get banned on DIF for joining SZ.

OTOH you may decline to disclose any opinion.

As you wish

dubmeup wrote:
Yep, I've worked in similar conditions, it's uncomfortable to say the least. Re mikey and myself, somebody should tell him to drop the sneaky snakey shit and outright lies against me and some others. There's really no need for it.

mikey mikey wrote:
Allow me to clarify? That's sweet....
Tis true, some members do get banned for joining here. They tend to be the ones that have aired grievances imo.
Some don't get banned.
No ambiguity necessary then. Some get banned - Not all. Quite simple really.

Yeah, mikey. It's stfu time case you hadn't noticed

Ooo get me being all authoritarian. Middle management is going to me head already and i aint even started yet

Oh well. Fuck the lot of yas anyway. Except them with the gift. They can be righteously honoured.

Weeman wrote:
Wasn't meant that way. I was trying to say that I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth.

I must say "don't start this shit" was a little uncalled for, but I put that down to a misunderstanding.
Weeman wrote:
Does that mean they read SZ in order to see who's airing grievances and then act accordingly?

Of course, in order to be sure then they would have to sign up themselves to get access to the rant forum and get around the "Hide texts from guest" function.

psketti wrote:
I'm not going to get into discussing that on the boards here psketti. Or on any boards for that matter. It's really not worth the trouble. Anyways, I'll let others decide who's who, or who are the real trouble makers for themselves.

Darkmoon wrote:
Speaking of forum wreckers, (which obviously isn't attributable to holocaust deniers or fuckwit nazis because they behave themselves & speak only in facts) what do you think about so many people getting banned from the DIF for just asking questions about TPV?

I know i am a trouble maker.
Pathetic really innit.








That there'd be a need of it.

People making veiled and/or ambiguous claims tend to be troublemakers in my experience.

I've just been messaged by our old friend Zhiba to say if I make any more posts about TPV on the DIF then they'll personally make sure I'm banned the same day.

Remind me, what does the P in TPV stand for again?

Prick's - I.e. Icke's.

People HAVE been banned on DIF for coming over here, even without whining about DIF.
So long as people are aware of that fact, then so be it.

Greencard wrote:
Ah, did merlincove finish that message of peace and freedom with the words "love and light"?

I think you'll find that, much like being in a choir, you can use your voice provided you stick to the song sheet.

mikey mikey wrote:
How did you guess? Lol! Love and light my arse! More like "passive aggresive and attention seeking".

Freedom of speech is great until people start using it.