irrepressible wrote:
What I've seen concerning chemtrails is usually very heavy early morning activity, clear blue sky filled with criss crossing trails, etc. A few hours later a completely white sky. I call it the roof because I feel like I'm indoors. It's fucking horrible.
I don't know much about it tbh. Why are they doing it? To block out the sun? To modify the weather? Both? More?
There are several theories and they can be running in parallel, but as I mentioned on another thread recently, keep in mind that Dr Strangelove himself, Dr Edward Teller, father of the H Bomb, Godfather of Reagan's Star Wars SDI Program, was one of the earliest and most influential voices regarding Geoengineering, which basically involves treating the whole planet and it's atmosphere as the payground of the military industrial complex. One example of what this means is that in the same year that the Van Allen Belt was discovered in 1958, the Americans exploded several nuclear devices in it. Here is a link to the 1962 tests that includes reference to 6 high latitude tests in 1958.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime
Edward Teller (Dr Strangelove) once the brilliant idea of creating a harbour by exploding nuclear devices. Again, keep this in mind when considering whether Geoengineering is really all about taking care of the planet and it's inhabitants.
The reason for chemtrails that has been discussed for decades now is "Stratospheric Dusting", supposedly to comabat global warming, which means releasing various kinds of particles, sulphur, barium, aluminium etc. mixed with jet fuel to increase the amount of trail left behind and ensuring the best and longest possible spread. This started being discussed in the 1970's and there many patents out there describing the various processes that are required to spray the particles and the particles themselves. Another key term in all this is ionization, that is, the charging of particles to ensure the rapid growth needed to produce the chemtrail rather than the condensation trail that would quickly disperse. It would be possible, for example, to modify jet fuel so that it contains more sulphur and other particles so that the fuel would burn dirty, which if ionized would increase in size and produce longer lasting trails. The aluminum particles can be used to reflect sunlight back into space, but some of the particles could also be used to improve the effectiveness of military communications and ensure total control of the skies.
In the past I often quoted the Ruskin College link to the Bush / Gorbachev Clouds Institute from the 1980's I think that contained references to stratospheric dusting / chemtrailing. It's rather sweet to think of Bush and Gorbachev being so interested in cloud making, again, surely in our very best interests.
So time moved on and in the late 1990's, when neocons elsewhere were drafting the Project for a New American Century that would call for a New Pearl Harbour to increase American acceptance of endless wars to spread US power, the US Air Force commisioned a paper with a title that really says it all: "Owning the Global Weather by 2025: Weather as a Force Multiplier". Note the use of global and owning, not influencing. Also the note that weather can be use as a weapon, although the United Nations ENMOD Convention of the 1970's expressly forbids this.
So basically, chemtrailing is generally denied, but every few months for the past few years, some institute around the world will push the plausible denial story of stratospheric dusting to combat global warming, and pathetically, each time the story is sold as if this were a new idea and the talk is mainly of balloons and primitive small scale testing rather than larger scale spraying as described and proposed in papers twenty years old and maybe older.
After ignoring (and ridiculing), comes plausible denial, and then the very obvious militarization of every square inch of the globe, which is contrary to the ENMOD Convention, but all sides are doing it.
Beyond the obvious and publicly stated military objectives come the black projects, which have unlimted funds; remember Donald Rumsfeld on the day prior to 9-11 telling the world that trillions of dollars were missing from the Pentagon budget. Money is no object for these people.
In the world of black ops lots of weird stuff is possible, including the use of unconventional aircraft technology that might just require a different mix up there in the skies, which involves positively charged ions that will lead to an increase of fake and shitty looking clouds as sprayed particles are ionized by radar, TV and mobile phone masts, satellites, etc.
There is also the possiblity of all kinds of nano chit being sprayed, morgellons for example, which would only be continuing the grand old tradition of western goverments spraying their own citizens with chemical and biological agents. The British government owned up to this when pushed by an MP, but only provided details up to 1978 I think. Since then we just have to trust them.
As Ab Origine wrote, most people aren't interested and will ignore papers, patents, etc. etfuckingcetera. It's a jungle out there in many ways, so make sure to take extra good care of your health if you can. People are pretty tough and adaptable. Look at the conditions in the slums of England in the past or those around the world now.
One question that often gets asked is "Why would they spray themselves?"
Answer: They did in the past. They also nuked the fuck out of the world in the 1950's, including the upper atmosphere. They've fired off depleted uranium rounds by the thousand. They built the nuclear power plants and very likely intended Fukishima to blow. Most of the people at the top haven't a clue what is really going on. That is left to a very small elite indeed, and you'll find that they are very, very keen on transhumanism: Humanity 2.0 which is intended to replace the current model.
If there's anyone still reading. Good night.