my no vote on this poll is a vote of confidence in the current 'mod' team

thoreau wrote:
See now, that's what I should have said but dogs made me all confused and stuff

thoreau wrote: Ditto.

'No' from me.

So how long is this all gonna take? Because I would like to know where I stand, and could be doing other things in my spare time.

jhado wrote:
It`s kind of like they say about actors, if you can tell they are acting maybe they are not such good actors. If they notice you moderating then maybe you are not doing it so well. ....oops did I just upset the other mods?

I voted yes because I think voting the current mods back into power is better than deciding not to vote them back in. Somebody mentioned Chavez. Well if we have a fair and free election then what can critics say? Their words will fall on deaf cheers.

i-baster wrote:
There is only one mod here being criticized by multiple members and others who show up from TZ & DIF.

jhado was never in question....

jhado wrote:
Hey, I didn't forget you when Vizier asked who the mod team is last night!

And even though you're not making a fuss (and nobody is) I personally feel a bit niggled that the team who've worked hard are now having to put up with this, under these circumstances. It seems a bit like a smack in the face to me,

If we vote for a re-election, will we even get any other willing candidates?

I've never had a problem with any of the current team and would like it to stay the way it is providing they all still wish to do so.

thoreau wrote: This

RA is like a squealing kid, hyped up on pepsi, sliding all over the floor at a wedding.
Cute and funny at first but then you want to give him a sly boot or step on his fingers.
Calm down kid, you're in the big people's way. Go have a nap.

.......... wrote:
I didn`t say he was. I was joking around. Regardless I think an election gives the mods the boost of knowing they are still appreciated. Maybe the mod in question should be up for re-election then. Seems fair.

i-baster wrote:
It's either all of us or none of us.

They were already elected. How the frick is voting for a re-election going to make them feel appreciated?

And re your previous suggestion of paying them wages, I-baster, how much are you offering, exactly?

feather wrote:
See, that's just nasty feather.

No need, seriously.

What say the entire admin team, all 4 of us, step down for the next 48 hours?

Enjoy what this lovely place will become

I thought Feather's remark was both funny and apt, myself.

Gilly wrote:
Already elected but no reason to re-elect them. I wasn`t offering wages. I was suggesting that when we all contribute to the forum then the person who runs the site get a bit from the excess. So far I have not financially contributed to the forum but would not rule it out in the future. Nobody has even mentioned my suggestion until you just then so I assume nobody likes the idea since you only mention it to roll your eyes.

diamondgeezer wrote: Sorry DG but after your performances here recently, I genuinely do not give a flying fuck what you think or don't think son.


and before you start your bs, I said what I said because he's a blatant shit stirring troll who fools no-one, not because he's an American blatant shit stirring troll who fools no-one.

i-baster wrote:
Oh, so now your observation that this will make them feel appreciated is crystal clear! Oh wait........

i-baster wrote:
How much do you think this excess might run to?

But feather you straight up suck so you know i'm not worried about you anyway....