Hold on. Is a Tory MP criticising someone else for having no valid policies and being too negative?



What's his solution? Let's close everything down and borrow more money than when we became the government. Fucking brilliant.

I felt very positive after hearing Russell Brand speak as i felt there was a seed of truth in the media.

All i ever hear or read in the media is propaganda which supports the status quo.

I always feel negative when i hear conservative mp's speak as they just represent the authoritarian mega rich few.

I liked Russel's passion.

How paxman or anybody can listen to the rubbish spoken day in day out by mp's is beyond me.

Paxman gets a million quid a year to listen, we get less than nothing

andyh wrote:
That's why the smug tw@ thinks it's OK to call interviewees trivial little men. He clearly thinks he himself is very important.

The BBC like to let the weller to do know a bit about such things as the reality of economics, political undercurrents etc. They appreciate that these folk live in bubbles, shuffling between town house and country retreat. Therefore, the BBC in combination with publications like the FT, do their bit to help the bubble dwellers take steps to protect their little bit of the status quo.
The BBC largely confine this activity to two fringe areas of their output. Newsnight and Radio 4. Traditionally, this has served it's purpose well. The masses, who never tuned in, remained ignorant whilst the statists got just enough info to keep things going.
Now, the internet is changing that as interviews appear on youtube and FB. The audience has widened.
Therefore, I am glad this egomaniacal lost boy has had his time with Paxman. I now await the second installment where Brand talks about life without money, personal responsibility, community co-operation.....

they will be sorry when we lynch them all and feast on their tender, pedigree flesh.

He may be an egomaniac, but I got that he gives a toss about the under-privileged, which says a lot in my book.

Hey Gilly, I weren't suggesting there's owt wrong with egomania

Well that's alright then!

I used to like Peep Show. I still like it in principle. It's just that David Mitchell turned out to be a complete tit in real life who is completely wrong in almost every assertion that I've ever seen him make, and Robert Webb thinks this:

www.newstatesman.com/2013/10/russell-cho...ind-revolution-there

I think Paxman knows exactly where Brand want's to go and provides him with the very questions to lead him there.
I'm quite sure this is all really about the BBC wanting to create a link between David Icke, Alex Jones and themselves.
The BBC are quite aware how they are discussed by D/I and A/J and their followers as paedophile protectors etc. . .
It just feels to me, yes it's just an instinctive feeling that Brand is an olive branch from the BBC to D/I & A/J ( the big hitters in alternative media)
I can't really think of any other words to explain further what I mean, I hope this makes some kind of sense.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
Yup, makes sense to me too...

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
Control the second pen where people are when they jump out of the first one?

The bit I don't get is why should I give a toss what a tv/radio/chatshow/film personality character spouts?

They have no more cred than the old wifey at the bus stop.

feather wrote:
They don't but they have the ability to reach a wider audience than a bus stop.

Space Bandit wrote: Yup but why do so many pay heed simply because they've seen him on tv etc?

novum wrote:
This has been obvious for years surely to anyone who has read Delooze

novum wrote:
Yes quite, induce Icke & Jones to change their opinions of the BBC by offering Brand as a platform for alternative voice to triangulate between Infowars news, The peoples Voice and BBC.
As seems to be all of a sudden on the cards.

jhado excuse my ignorance But I don't know who that is ,Delooze?

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
www.oneballmedia.com/