knobmeup wrote:
Yes I get your drift and your drift stinks.

Are you suggesting they shouldn't have lives?
Are you suggesting you shouldn't be reported for throwing that word about?
Or are you just suggesting I stink?

mikey mikey wrote: Dream on dearest Mikey Mikey, you may have convinced one or two subjectable fools to join your perception, anyone with any sense will clearly see that Brand has an element of communist ideology at times in his presentations, he even refers to Marx the co author of the communist manifesto as a source of viewpoint.
You had twisted that observation that I posted into '' You have shown no evidence that he's in the communist party'
I never said he was in the communist party thus your strawman is broken.
Simples.
Now I don't want you to admit failure, I don't expect you to do so, you possibly really believe that I think that Brand is an extreme leftist and a member of the communist party because I noted that he had referred to Marx as a source of viewpoint (the co author of you know what).
Now read this bit slowly Mikey Mikey That's not why I'm using this forum

So the options appear to be, this goes on and on with you in denial that Brand has a leaning for Marx the author of you know what, or you honestly believe that I did post that Brand was in the communist party, or that I have labelled Brand as an extremist lefty.
Or you could think 'hey I suppose Frothy has made a valid point Brand does seem to be somewhat interested in Marxist viewpoint and Brand is a bit of a lefty, with his references to the Messiah Complex and his recent publications/presentation.
Frothy did not say that using a communist ideology or communist fantasies was a bad thing'.

And then perhaps I could change my viewpoint of you to, mmmmmm perhaps Mikey Mikes suffers from *Premature Assumption Disorder PAD.
(* I just made that term up)
and that Mikey Mikey has had a knee jerk reaction to what he thought was an allegation of dearest Russy Brand being an outright communist extremist by misreading the terms 'some sort of communist ideology or communist fantasies' as extremist communist.
In the same way that using some sort of Christian ideology in ones presentation would not mean 'extremist fundamentalist Christian brethen'

So you see Mikey Mikey no matter how you want to twist and slide you have mistaken ''some sort of'....... for .......'extremist'.

And that dear Mikey Mikey is how you failed before you started to react.

I'll forgive you for your mistake of my postings as an act of good will.
I do find your entire behaviour about this towards a new poster as somewhat harassing.
But after spending a few months on DIF I have met enough harassing posts and it usually ends up with the harassers acting like the innocent party, thus their behaviour is concealed.
Your behaviour appeared to be to me thus ''you're accusing Brand of this or that, you're portraying him of this or that'' when in fact I only brought attention to one of Brands own comments about Marxism, Marx being the co autho.........

knobmeup wrote:
I'm suggesting that your comments on this thread towards me stinks, both before and after I termed them as retarded.

As I don't know you I refer to your posts as retarded, a new poster starts a thread and you pop up with your childish comments,

''tiz sock'' .... or ''smalls drawer''

Now you want to play the victim.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
That's the whole point. Are you really a new poster? It's because you're not even prepared to give a direct answer to that question that the animosity is perpetuated. I think if you gave an assurance that you are, people would take your word for it and give you a fair chance - befriend you even. But if you choose not to, then there's not much hope of that happening

Gilly wrote:
My first post on this forum was as followsCousin_Frothy wrote:
If you don't want to see that is notification of my 'arrival' to this forum then I can't help you.

Cousin_Frothy wrote: My comments toward you are based on being 100% convinced that you are either a sock or some other form of wannabe trouble making twat.
That is insulting you and, twats.
You using the word you chose to I suppose does insult me, though not from my perspective. What pisses me off is that you are using that term. A term which shows you think that it's ok to sneer at folk who may not have all of the advantages/blessings that you and I enjoy.
You suggesting that is me playing the victim card is merely another proof that you're just here to be a wannabe trouble maker twat.

As far as I am concerned that's reason enough for you to be booted. This is not a safe haven for bigoted ideas.
Plus, we've had more than our fair share of wannabe trouble maker twats here and after a process of attrition, I have a zero tolerance view point.

knobmeup wrote: You turned up on this thread that I created and started making retarded comments '' smalls drawer' ' tiz sock'
Those comments are the comments of a retarded twat, and you made them, so the cap fits.
Now you 'bless' me with being a wannabe trouble maker after turning up spouting nonsense crap on a thread that I started about an unrelated topic to your rude comments.
Do you really have to wonder why I would post you to the term retard ?

You appear to enjoy a conflict Cousin, rather than trying to get on with us here you have instantly become beligerent.

Buck up, or fuck off, simple innit?

jhado wrote:
Oh well jhado, as you know, I started this thread in good faith, since then it has been subjected to rude comments that are totally unrelated to the thread.
How can I get along with some of these 'posters' when their posts on biocentrism are things like '' smalls drawer'' ...''tiz sock''...'much grudge''
It seems that these posts have been made to try to agitate me, or would you say that they were either friendly or related to the thread?
It's not as simple as 'Buck up or fuck off' it's as simple as don't accuse new posters of being socks or cunts or twats and expect them to be pleasent in return?
These comments when presented in unison = clique.

Feel free to post the post prior to this in the thread which justified turning things personal?!

I'll save you the trouble, you can't because it ain't there!

So buck up or fuck off.

To my mind a genuine new member would have already decided this place wasn't welcoming to them and not logged in again, whereas what cousin frothy is doing is revelling in it, across threads...

Aint very good at this lark eh...

oioioi wrote:
But On the russel brand thread you posted
oioioi wrote:
Bit rude no?

knobmeup wrote:
I can see how you have reached that conclusion, however if you want to harass me I'm not a runner, It seems that your number one goal is not to be welcoming or friendly to me but to show me to be a fraud.
How sad you are

Yes, we know what your first post as Cousin_Frothy was - you know I know, because I responded to it at the time. That's not the question though, is it! Quoting your first post here as Cousin_Frothy does not address the question of whether you've been here before as someone else.

Your refusal to give a straight answer to a straight question does nothing to endear you, or convince anyone of your genuineness. I expect you're already aware of that. I'm quite bored of you now, and not prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt any longer. Bye.

Cousin_Frothy wrote: I think you mistake my intent Mmmm, number one goal??? Mmmm, think that would be to leave this earth knowing that the human race had at least started the process of becoming an evolved species.
You're right about one thing. I've no desire whatsoer to be welcoming to wannabe trouble maker twats.A lot of things sadden me. One being that there are so many wannabe trouble maker twats in the World.

Cousin_Frothy wrote: It's ok sockboy, I did see this before you accidentally deleted it.
Some fuckers, like Icke and William Hague indeed think I'm a tmt. Like you, they don't label me a wannabe. I'm perfectly content with my role in that angle of things.

Cousin_Frothy wrote:
So you used another thread/your own thread to 'retaliate' against a (obviously) rhetorical question and wonder why your thread isn't everyone sticking to the OP?

Fuck off eh?

oioioi wrote:
But at least my (obvious) rhetorical response on this thread was in a post related to this thread, your post to a newcommer had nothing else in it, bar your (rhetorical) comment about my darling girlfriend, how personal and rude it was too

knobmeup wrote:
I deleted it on purpose because we're playing pingpong between 'Arrivals Introductions & Welcomes' and 'biocentrism' threads.