Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid?

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 26 Aug 2013 14:59 #601

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 27 Aug 2013 22:00 #602

  • entrangermercenary1
  • entrangermercenary1's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1687
  • Thank you received: 333
  • Karma: 15
Has this embassy been raided yet :conf: ?? :killinme:
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 28 Aug 2013 01:17 #603

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Has this embassy been raided yet :conf: ?? :killinme:



:mf:
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gilly

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 28 Aug 2013 11:26 #604

  • entrangermercenary1
  • entrangermercenary1's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1687
  • Thank you received: 333
  • Karma: 15
chandrakavi wrote:
entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Has this embassy been raided yet :conf: ?? :killinme:



:mf:

Obviously another uni waste of space.
The clue is in the title of the thread... :killinme:
And the first post made by the op :O

Live Stream

www.ustream.tv/channel/occupynewsnetwork

Not much has happened but there is a lot of police activity there.

Ecuador will possibly grant Assange asylum

www.disinfo.com/2012/08/officials-claim-...lian-assange-asylum/

Or will the UK raid the embassy?

www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/08/uk-thr...ned-to-raid-embassy/

:rofl:
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 28 Aug 2013 11:30 #605

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
That was the question when the thread originally started merc, which you know ofc.
Perhaps we should change thread titles as time goes by :roll:
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: chandrakavi

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 28 Aug 2013 15:56 #606

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
Maybe it should simply be called JULIAN ASSANGE.

He's ready to have a seat in the Australian Senate now.
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 30 Aug 2013 00:55 #607

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
Australian Election: A Game of Polls [RAP NEWS 20] - YouTube



Rap News season finale: Episode 20 - A Game Of Polls. A messenger raven has arrived
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: andyh

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 25 Sep 2013 23:00 #608

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 30 Sep 2013 02:01 #609

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 03 Dec 2013 02:14 #610

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
news.yahoo.com/us-said-unlikely-prosecut...J2UYWAJ1SgSEAgU7_wgt.

US said unlikely to prosecute Assange for publishing leaks

Nov 26, 2013 5:42 PM
.
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange speaks to the media inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London on June 14, 2013 (AFP Photo/Anthony Devlin)

Washington (AFP) - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange runs little risk of being charged in the United States for having published hundreds of thousands of classified documents, The Washington Post reported Tuesday, citing unnamed US officials.

Assange's lawyer Barry Pollack noted the report but told AFP that the Justice Department has made no formal statement.

Assange "would welcome a formal and unequivocal statement from the Department of Justice that it has not brought charges against him," Pollack said.

A spokesperson from the Department of Justice declined to comment.

Assange has been holed up in the Ecuadoran embassy in London since June 2012 to escape extradition to Sweden to face questioning in two sexual assault cases.

He has insisted, however, that he is driven by fear that he will be extradited to the United States to face trial for WikiLeaks' publication of classified US military and diplomatic documents.

A US Army private, Bradley Manning, was sentenced to 35 years in prison in August for passing 700,000 classified documents to WikiLeaks.

The Post, however, said the Justice Department has all but concluded it will not bring charges against Assange, even though a grand jury investigating the massive leak remains impaneled.

Government lawyers believed they could not prosecute Assange without also prosecuting US journalists and news outlets that had taken part in leaks, which they were not going to do, the Post said.

Assange would have to be prosecuted "for something other than publishing information -- like hacking into a network," former Department of Justice spokesman Matthew Miller told AFP.

"It appears that they never found that," Miller said, despite the nearly three-year-old grand jury investigation.

According to Miller, Assange's situation is similar to that of Glenn Greenwald, the Guardian journalist who published leaked information provided by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

Attorney General Eric Holder told the Post in an interview earlier this month that the Justice Department was still trying to repatriate Snowden but had no plans to prosecute Greenwald.

"Under the US law, it is absolutely a crime to leak classified information," said Miller.

"But publishing classified information is a much different question and no one has ever been charged with publishing classified information," he said.

Fay Brundage, a spokeswoman for the attorney's office for the Eastern District of Virginia, which is responsible for the WikiLeaks investigation, said it was still ongoing.
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
Last Edit: 03 Dec 2013 23:40 by chandrakavi.
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 04 Dec 2013 00:10 #611

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
Snowman.jpg 465 620 C
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 18 Dec 2013 17:12 #612

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
www.abc.net.au/news/2013-12-18/snowden-w...t-nsa-spying/5163072


US intelligence leaker Edward Snowden plans to seek political asylum in Brazil in exchange for helping investigate US spying on the country, according to a Brazilian newspaper report.
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
Last Edit: 18 Dec 2013 17:15 by chandrakavi.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gilly

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 22 Dec 2013 17:17 #613

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
The reason why Governments are afraid of Edward Snowden speak out, is because in the Patriot Act the Cyber-Space would
Have to be included.


Echelon
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 13 Jan 2014 17:26 #614

  • hugorune
  • hugorune's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • I'm not wearing hockey pants
  • Posts: 4656
  • Thank you received: 4131
  • Karma: 15
Swedish Prosecutor: Time to Close the Assange Case

STOCKHOLM (Rixstep) — Is it reasonable that someone in an embassy in London has no way for the next 27 years to leave the building, whilst the Swedes could remedy the situation without significant disadvantage to anyone? That's what Swedish district prosecutor Rolf Hillegren is asking.

The above description, without too much excessiveness, summarises the situation with the Assange case. And I am fully convinced that the situation is very troublesome at least for our prime minister, our minister for justice, and our prosecutor-general. To make it even worse: it's insulting not only to the Swedish authorities, but also to the British who've helped bring it about.

So what do we need to solve the dilemma? Yes, it's about biting into a very bitter apple, but that unpleasantry should be insignificant compared to the alternative which is several times worse.

A short recap: Julian Assange visited Sweden in 2010 as a celebrated hero. But the visit had repercussions he hadn't counted on. Two women he'd spent time with were worried they'd contracted HIV and therefore went to the police, the one to support the other. The police decided to open a criminal complaint, so Assange was arraigned, arrested, and interrogated. The prosecutor closed the investigation as far as the more serious allegation; what was left was an accusation of molestation, even that one very questionable. Assange stayed in the country a while after the warrant was rescinded. So no, he did not try to evade 'Swedish justice'.

The complainant counsel then petitioned to reopen the closed case for the benefit of both women. The decision came to a higher prosecutor who granted the petition. But by then Assange had already left the country and was unwilling to return, as he'd become afraid he'd be surrendered to the US by Sweden. No matter this fear is well-founded - it's obvious Assange is convinced it's a real threat.

So at this point the prosecutor requested Assange be arrested in absentia (again) whereafter an international arrest warrant (Red Notice) was issued. The Stockholm appellate court reduced the accusations before the warrant went out, Assange turned up voluntarily at a police station in the UK as soon as the warrant was in effect, and after several months of twists and turns, the British supreme court decided he should be extradited to Sweden. But Assange made his way to the Ecuador embassy in Knightsbridge and was given asylum by Ecuador. He can remain at the embassy until the year 2040 when the statute of limitations takes effect, if the Swedish authorities aren't keen on finding a solution to this delicate issue, something that long ago passed beyond the proportionate, the reasonable, and the decent.

How could this happen? The decision to close the case was well-founded and was made by an experienced prosecutor. The decision to reopen the investigation was not well-founded, something especially unfortunate, given everything that happened afterwards. It should also be mentioned that a decision to dismiss a sex case is taken very carefully, due to all the hysteria surrounding such cases. The motto was to turn over all stones, which resulted in turning over stones that were of no interest - and all this just to minimise heat from the media.

But the investigation leaked onto the net and now anyone can read it and draw their own conclusions. And I believe that few people with any sense of evidentiary evaluation will see the case as something to not be closed. The women have been interrogated and there are no more steps to the investigation. It's highly unlikely that were Assange to be interrogated again, he'd say something that made it possible to bring the case to court. It is therefore incomprehensible what the prosecutor expects him to say. So the interrogation of Assange is completely unnecessary. The situation with Assange and the women is mostly about differences of opinion about the use of condoms. And that's not the type of dispute that's settled in our courts.

If this had been about a man resident in Sweden, no major damage would have occurred. He'd have been questioned one more time and then the investigation would have been closed again. But the suspect wasn't just anyone and no one could have predicted what was going to happen. And this is when the circus began. Prestige entered stage centre, and the prosecutor painted herself into a corner. And she's still there, but unfortunately she also dragged down the judicial system which has now been shamed for over three years.

As soon as it was clear that Assange was not prepared to voluntarily go to Sweden, the prosecutor should have seen that he was questioned in London. If she'd done that, the loss of international prestige for Sweden would have been limited if she immediately afterwards formally closed the cases: no one outside the world of law would have understood that the second questioning of Assange had never been necessary. But instead of this solution, the prosecutor has insisted this questioning be held in Sweden, in the event the case could lead to prosecution. This would have been the correct decision - had the evidentiary situation been otherwise.

Due to all the utterly unreal twists and turns, the case has devolved into something extraordinary. And if you want to end the stalemate, then you need to do something completely extraordinary. And everything points to it being worth the cost. Only stubbornness and continued prestige thinking can stand in the way.

What can be done? Well, the prosecutor-general should on his own initiative (ex officio) rescind the decision to reopen the investigation, rescind the arraignment ruling, and rescind the arrest warrant.

Now someone may claim that something so radical would still make it impossible for the two women to take their case to court. Even here one needs an unconventional solution. The state should therefore ex gratia pay damages which they would have been awarded if Assange were tried and convicted. One would thereby avoid possible claims that the women were stepped over by the judicial system. This is an attractive solution - not in the least with regard for the state's responsibility for creating this situation and the fact that the women have suffered in the media.

What will be the result? The Swedish judicial system will again be harshly criticised. But once the criticism dies down, it's likely that voices will be heard that point out that Sweden finally made a wise decision - not in the least when one considers the alternative.

Sweden would in addition save face for Great Britain for their part in the bizarre situation by making it possible for Assange to flee to the Ecuador embassy. And Assange would be able to leave the embassy a free citizen, no longer looking at staying in Knightsbridge for another 27 years.

Rolf Hillegren
Former district prosecutor
radsoft.net/news/20140112,00.shtml
Si me puede disparar los conejos, a continuación, puedo disparar fascistas
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gilly, chandrakavi

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 05 Feb 2014 09:21 #615

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
Swedish MPs are calling on the prosecutors in the Julian Assange sexual assault case to travel to London and question the WikiLeaks founder at the Ecuadorian embassy, where he has been taking refuge since June 2012.
However, Anders Perklev, the Swedish prosecutor-general, was convinced the lawmakers are interfering with the judicial matters.
“The fact that an MP openly questions a prosecutor’s decision-making in an individual case is remarkable,” he said.

Oddly enough US Attorney General Eric Holder met with Mr Perklev just yesterday during the first-ever visit to Sweden by the United States' top legal official.
:coffee:
And what has triggered all this?
The Swedish MPs statement comes just a day after Assange saying that one of the women involved in the case sent text messages admitting he never raped her.
Oh, is that so? :chin:
Plus, the alleged victim "did not want to put any charges on JA, but that the police were keen on getting a grip on him," according to the affidavit published on WikiLeaks website.

And when this turns out to have been a set up...
The operation to monitor the embassy in order to apprehend Assange should he emerge from it reportedly costs British taxpayers 6 million pounds a year.

Can we send Sweden and the US the bill? :taptap:

rt.com/news/assange-swedish-urge-prosecutors-672/
thank you St Jude for favours granted
Last Edit: 05 Feb 2014 09:23 by mikey mikey.
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 05 Feb 2014 20:46 #616

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
benswann.com/media-blacks-out-new-snowde...snt-want-you-to-see/

BLACK OUT SNOWDEN INTERVIEW THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WANT YOU TO SEE
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: mikey mikey

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 05 Feb 2014 20:50 #617

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
chandrakavi wrote:
benswann.com/media-blacks-out-new-snowde...snt-want-you-to-see/

BLACK OUT SNOWDEN INTERVIEW THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WANT YOU TO SEE
In addition, the video has been taken down almost immediately every time it’s posted on YouTube.

Must see

Many sincere thanks chand.

Really!
thank you St Jude for favours granted
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: chandrakavi

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 05 Feb 2014 20:57 #618

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
mikey mikey wrote:
chandrakavi wrote:
benswann.com/media-blacks-out-new-snowde...snt-want-you-to-see/

BLACK OUT SNOWDEN INTERVIEW THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WANT YOU TO SEE
In addition, the video has been taken down almost immediately every time it’s posted on YouTube.

Must see[/size
Many sincere thanks chand.

Really!

No problem Mickey Mickey!

I think the video will last longer here as live leak.


EDIT: Here is the written interview of this video, in writing things seem to last longer before being pulled....


www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/01/27-1
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
Last Edit: 05 Feb 2014 21:26 by chandrakavi.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: mikey mikey

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 08 Mar 2014 14:48 #619

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
m.ibnlive.com/news/edward-snowden-julian...-2014/456593-11.html



Home » Tech
Edward Snowden, Julian Assange top bill at SXSW 2014

Associated Press | 08-Mar-2014 13:11 PM

Austin: Surveillance. Online privacy. Robots. Food processing. Wearable computers. To get a sense of what's on the minds of the tech industry's thinkers, leaders and tinkerers, it's a good idea to head to Austin, Texas, rather than Silicon Valley this time of the year.
More than 30,000 people descend on this eccentric city for the South By Southwest Interactive Festival (SXSW) each March. This year, NSA leaker Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks founder and secret spiller Julian Assange are topping the bill, alongside Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, Twitter co-founder Biz Stone and Anne Wojcicki, CEO of genetics testing company 23andMe.
Snowden and Assange won't be making the trip to Texas, however. They'll appear on live video, since both are living as fugitives, in Moscow and the Ecuadorian embassy in London, respectively. Their inclusion illustrates how the festival is trying to balance holding on to its independent roots even as it's flooded by a barrage of corporate sponsors and threatens to grow too big for its hometown.
"We have always said that South By Southwest is a very big tent and we have all different types of people," said Hugh Forrest, director of the interactive festival. "This is a feature and not a flaw."

Still, it's clear that online privacy and government surveillance is on top of the technology set's mind this year. Snowden, the former NSA contractor who appears Monday, faces felony charges in the US after revealing the agency's mass surveillance program by leaking thousands of classified documents to media outlets. He is living under temporary asylum in Russia, which has no extradition treaty with the US.
Snowden is unlikely to talk about the case against him during the session and will focus instead on "how technology enables surveillance and how technology can protect us from surveillance," said Christopher Soghoian, principal technologist at the American Civil Liberties Union. Soghoian will be speaking to Snowden along with Snowden's legal adviser, the ACLU's Ben Wizner. Snowden is being represented by the ACLU in the US government's case against him.

Speaking at South By Southwest - rather than in front of Congress or at a conference of lawyers - gives Snowden a chance to talk to the technology community, "his peers," Soghoian said.
"The reason the NSAs collected as much information as it did is because of technology," he said. "Technology got us into this mess and technology will get us out of it."

Assange, meanwhile, will speak on Saturday with Benjamin Palmer, the co-founder of The Barbarian Group, a marketing agency whose clients range from Pepsi to Samsung to New York City. As to why a marketing executive is interviewing a figure as controversial as Assange? A hint: Visitors to the group's website are greeted with the message "We create ideas that provoke a reaction."

Part of the larger South By Southwest festival that also includes music, film and recently education segments, SXSWi, as it's dubbed, became a separate event in 1994, when it was still called "SXSW Multimedia." Past speakers have ranged from the computer scientist and virtual reality pioneer Jaron Lanier in 1997 to investor Mark Cuban in 1999 and Friendster founder Jonathan Abrams in 2004.
This is where Twitter soared from obscurity to the world stage in 2007, where Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg appeared on stage in 2008 when his site was still the No. 2 online social network behind MySpace and where the location-sharing app Foursquare emerged a year later.
Attendees looking for the next Twitter, Facebook or even Foursquare here, though, might have to dig a bit deeper these days. As the festival evolves and grows bigger each year, it's becoming more difficult - not to mention more expensive - to stand out as the coolest startup or the most useful app.

For Caroline Tien-Spalding, marketing director at imaging firm ArcSoft, the interactive festival is where new ideas percolate.
"You have a lot of things at the very, very beginning. You don't know what's going to make it and what won't," said Tien-Spalding, who is giving a presentation about the future of facial recognition technology, titled "The Good, the Bad & the Ugly," on Tuesday.
Other sessions at the five-day festival include discussions such as "The Next Steve Jobs May Be from Africa," "The Internet of Cars" and "Welcoming the Robot Workforce." On Sunday, Rodrigo Martinez, life sciences chief strategist at the design firm IDEO, will be part of a panel about the future of wearable technology called "The Connected Body - Can We Get Value from Wearables."
The problem, he says, is that the conversations about wearables are being driven by hardware and software rather than the motivations, needs and inspirations of the humans who use them.

"Forget about technology," he said. "What are the things that matter to an individual - and then you design around that."
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
Last Edit: 08 Mar 2014 14:50 by chandrakavi.
You must register to post here.

Julian Assange Ecuadorian embassy raid? 03 Apr 2014 20:43 #620

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2744
  • Thank you received: 1255
  • Karma: 22
kevtownsend.wordpress.com/2014/04/03/how...sange-and-wikileaks/


media2.libertarianbooks.se/2013/12/SWEDE...-Ferrada-de-Noli.pdf


How the US has prevailed in the political conspiracy against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks
April 3, 2014Leave a commentGo to comments
Four days ago I wrote, Let’s not forget Assange. I did this because of a television interview between Eva Joly (a French-Norwegian prosecutor) and Malou von Sivers. While not unexpected, it was still surprising to hear that Joly had been refused meetings with the Minister for Justice, the Prosecutor-General, and the individual prosecutor Marianne Ny — in fact, anyone with anything to do with the legal case against Assange.

It is now clear why they would not talk to her: there simply is no legal case against Assange, just a political conspiracy. A new book by Prof. Marcello Ferrada de Noli (Sweden Vs Assange: Human Rights Issues) makes this very clear. (You can get an outline of de Noli here in my earlier post, Sweden — Paradise Lost, a continuing tragedy.)

Little in de Noli’s book is new, but seeing it all in one place is compelling. It starts, of course, with Chelsea (née Bradley) Manning’s Afghan leaks to WikiLeaks. The US, as we know, takes a dim view of whistleblowers, and was seriously embarrassed on the world stage by the Manning documents revealed by WikiLeaks. It wrote to its allies operating in Afghanistan requesting that Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, be arrested. These allies, note, include both Sweden and Britain.

Sweden (its neutrality long discredited and, following the Snowden files, now known as The Sixth Eye) had the first opportunity — but it was always about the founder of WikiLeaks and never about the man called Julian Assange (see You cut off the head to kill the snake – the threat to Julian Assange).

When a complaint of rape was made, he was arrested. But there was no legal case against him. The case was dropped; but the political will to do the bidding of the US remained. However, since there was no legal case against him, simply re-arresting him would inevitably lead to his re-release.

Assange asked Marianne Ny, the prosecutor, if he could leave the country and was told he could do so. While traveling to the airport, which he did openly and in no haste, Ny decided to rearrest him. It appears that the only police that were not informed of this new warrant were the airport police where he was waiting to leave the country — in fact, Assange’s lawyer did not learn about the new warrant until three days after it was issued. By this time Assange was in the UK.

The standard way to get Assange back to Sweden would be through a European Arrest Warrant (EAW), which Sweden could rely on Britain to honour. Had he been arrested while still in Sweden, the process would be open and visible — and he would undoubtedly have been released (because there is no legal case) almost immediately. But if he is returned to Sweden under an EAW he would be held in prison and extradited to the US without public scrutiny.

In Britain Assange (well aware by now of what was going on) appealed the extradition back to Sweden. Most British lawyers believed his case was solid, and expected him to win. But remember that Britain, like Sweden, is one of the US allies that America had requested to arrest Assange. By indulging in semantic contortions, in claiming that the UK is subject to the French language version rather than the English language version of the same EU requirement, the judge was able to uphold the EAW and order Assange to be returned to Sweden.

By now, of course, Assange had been granted asylum in the Ecuadorean embassy in London. But the reality is, America had won. The case was never against Assange the man, but against WikiLeaks the organization. The purpose was to separate the founder from the founded to neutralize the organization.

This has been achieved. Assange is not in asylum in the embassy, he is in prison in the embassy, permanently surrounded by British police. America is happy with this, because it is an open-ended life sentence with no appeal that has successfully decapitated WikiLeaks. If Assange were to ‘appeal’, he would have to leave the embassy. He would then be arrested by the British police and returned to Sweden. There he would be imprisoned until he could be secretly extradited to the US, to face trial for espionage and imprisoned for 40+ years.

The United States, Britain and Sweden are perfectly happy with the current situation. Assange has been imprisoned for life without trial.
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity. :D


www.happyplace.com/24470/a-love-letter-t...g-my-online-activity
Last Edit: 03 Apr 2014 20:48 by chandrakavi.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gilly
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.284 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today90
Yesterday1015
Week1105
Month10088
Total1108512

Your IP Address: 216.73.217.123 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Tuesday, 18 August 2026 01:36

Who Is Online

Guests : 182 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel