wake_up_bomb wrote:
Quite the understatement.

If we could have just waited 1 extra day for the story to unfold here at Sanctum Zone we could have avoided the psychotic conspiracy madness that was going on in this 12 page thread. It's really fucking insane and i'm starting to understand why dogsmilk would come here and try to interject some logic into this forum. Just because 9/11 was shady does not mean Aurora, Sandy Hook, Woolwich and each time the media runs a tragic story where people get killed it's a false flag. Maybe entrangermercenary is right and i need to give up smoking that shit. Maybe alot of truthers including myself have drug induced mental illness that makes us look for conspiracy where it's plain as day simply not the case. And going back to Aurora & Sandy Hook how stupid could truthers have been to think 300 million guns in America were going to be confiscated by some mystery police. Obama can't even stop black kids in the ghetto from listening to rap music, throwing up gang signs and killing each other by the thousands. So how the fuck would he set up Aurora & Sandy Hook to take over 300 million guns away from Americans. Serious how stupid could people have been to believe that nonsense? This guy getting killed in Woolwich is a major eye opener to me on where i stand in the future as a conspiracy theorist. So the question going forward is how will truthers focus on stopping billionaires from hoarding wealth when they are busy looking for NAFF (Not A False Flag).

Well at least here at sanctum zone it's not totally fucking insane with thousands of post about this like DIF...

Like i said earlier in this thread all we had to do is wait one day for the family's response before jumping to conclusions.

Sadly people on DIF think his parents, wife, family & friends are all "Crisis actors"...Fucking Psychopaths...

Why are you doing this, RA?

If you don't want to talk about this, don't talk about this. No?

Ab Origine wrote:
Fair enough, that's my final post in this thread Ab's....

.......... wrote:
Don't be daft. I'm just curious as you seem to be quite eager to get your point across, repeatedly.

See...now you've made me suspicious.

Ab Origine wrote:
It's the conspiracy state of mind, i don't blame you....

I understand your point Ra - I honestly do.

However, as has already been said, I think we'd be naive to not be thinking like this about stuff, at least a little bit to begin with. You yourself must surely admit that we have been lied to and shat on from great heights for a very long time. I believe that once you realise this, you can't help but have that realisation colour the information you are exposed to on a daily basis.

I don't believe there to be a wrong or right about it, personally. It's not like I'd have said any of this to the victim's family, if I'd known any of them.

It just rings my bell a bit when people start saying stuff like "you shouldn't be talking about this" or "have some decency" or "perhaps you're smoking too much waccy baccy" etc. If only because I've seen it all before and guess what? That time, it turned out that there actually was a great deal to hide.

.......... wrote:
you will find that most of the faceless cunts on the DIF are extremist instigator actors,with a only a few genuine posters on there...you do realise this dont you ........ and you tooo appear to have some kind of anti monarchy agenda..

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabatabaei

thoreau wrote:
This

If there wasn't the circus act in govt and in the media over what was plainly just yobbery which goes on every day in the UK then none of this would have seemed suspicious in the first place.

Gilly wrote:

Gilly it was all over twitter......I understnd a lot of comments from the original tweety things have been removed (these were from people saying there's two guys ripping somones head off

Also I don't tweet or facebook so if I saw someone getting their head ripped off I certainly would not think ....'oh I must post about this on the internet and share it with others


I just don't understand why people are saying this didn't happen and was actors when the reality is it did happen ........the goverenment will use it to there agenda

Gilly wrote:
Gilly...staged!!!...give your head a shake ffs

I don't look at Twitter, Dawn. Or Facebook.

At first look, it seemed unreal, because of the conflicting pictures and various other things. As already stated, having seen more information, I do believe this horrible thing happened as described.

Yes, the government will use it for their own purposes - I've already heard things on the radio today about the FBI's response to criticism in when it's been revealed they'd been aware of those 2 men for 8 years, being that the problem with a free society is that these things can happen.

Tower Bridge underground's been shut down for a while today, btw, as tooled up police investigated after a man carrying an axe was sighted in the vicinity. It's back open again, and I've not found any report of further detail.

Also the M6 was closed for a while near Coventry today amid fears of a van with a bomb in it. It didn't have a bomb in it after all, and was instead said to be involved in bulk fuel theft, so I don't know where the bomb reports came from.

Lots of bogey men about at the minute.

LightGiver wrote:
Did we not have this conversation on Icke

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Why?Do you think things are never staged, so everything should be taken immediately at face value?

oioioi wrote:
So the bloke has just crashed his car into a bloke...jumps out and attempts to decapitate and disembowel him.has a hard on as he thinks he will be meeting the 40 virgins very soon....and your pulling him up for the use of "our troops"
Obviously you need a toke

Gilly wrote:
Georgia v Ossetia at the beginning to ramp it up, certain things were staged with dead bodies.

Fist of all you were doubting the murder actually took place!!! What actually led you to that conclusion ?

The lack of blood in newspaper pictures is due to the It being edited out, as the last time i saw newspapers were not top shelf material.

If you look at any footage of the bloke with the blood on his hands, his fucking top from around the waist down is covered in claret, thick claret. If you look at aerial footage of where they actually killed him, you can see by the paving slabs the amount of blood that has been spilled, CONSISTANT with major trauma.
If you look at the footage of when the fucker was shot by the police, you can clearly see the red hands.

If you look around on the net you can actually find footage from the flats with the women with the shopping trolly going by without any editing.

So the wanker who posted the dubunk video could not edit every video lol

Hows that

englishdefenceleague.org/edl-news-2/1919...e-to-woolwich-attack

Well said that man

No surrender ever? stupid cunts, as bad as their Muslamic counterparts, now the people running both sides are up to no good in terms of prs, but these guys are usfull idiots, all of em.

thoreau wrote:
Firstly nothing will justify to my mind butchering/murdering/droning anyone, however;

This is the point I've been trying to raise. Having watched 'machette' fella's reasoning in full I cannot find a good reason to oppose it, that does not by any means mean I condone the beheading and gutting of any fucker. There's a reason the MSM cut out his most pertinent points.

Paraphrasing but it was basically "I did this to a UK soldier in the UK because on a daily basis UK soldiers do this in lands they have no jurisdiction over.

I can easily dismiss the conclusion he reached, I struggle to dismiss his rationale though.