No surrender ever? stupid cunts, as bad as their Muslamic counterparts, now the people running both sides are up to no good in terms of prs, but these guys are usfull idiots, all of em.

Gilly wrote:
Georgia v Ossetia at the beginning to ramp it up, certain things were staged with dead bodies.

Fist of all you were doubting the murder actually took place!!! What actually led you to that conclusion ?

The lack of blood in newspaper pictures is due to the It being edited out, as the last time i saw newspapers were not top shelf material.

If you look at any footage of the bloke with the blood on his hands, his fucking top from around the waist down is covered in claret, thick claret. If you look at aerial footage of where they actually killed him, you can see by the paving slabs the amount of blood that has been spilled, CONSISTANT with major trauma.
If you look at the footage of when the fucker was shot by the police, you can clearly see the red hands.

If you look around on the net you can actually find footage from the flats with the women with the shopping trolly going by without any editing.

So the wanker who posted the dubunk video could not edit every video lol

Hows that

oioioi wrote:
So the bloke has just crashed his car into a bloke...jumps out and attempts to decapitate and disembowel him.has a hard on as he thinks he will be meeting the 40 virgins very soon....and your pulling him up for the use of "our troops"
Obviously you need a toke

as he thinks he will be meeting the 40 virgins very soon

Who are you fighting for when you fight exactly?

oioioi wrote:

Whoever's paying his wage.

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
I bet you didn't look at all the thread, did you?

There were pictures with red hands, pictures without red hands, pictures with red street, pictures without red street, & pictures with red hands but no red street.

And the woman said to be comforting the headless corpse seemed bizarrely unrealistic too.

Why would the person who posted the debunk video want to edit anything?

The debunk video is the one where he's explaining that the doctored pictures are the ones with the red removed from the hands, because it resulted in removing the red of the red road markings too.

I can't say I've ever noticed tabloids editing blood from their pictures though tbh. And why would they, then the news reporters had already made such a big production of the blood on the hands, repeatedly drawing attention to it?

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
It's 72 virgins you dingbat.

Most muslims I talked to view that with the same attitude as most Christians I know view the "wings and a harp on a cloud".

Only fundies of either are literalists.

But then again people believe strange stuff: like football is worth fighting for or dulce et decorum est.

Cunts them Muslims tbh...When I was fighting for them they only promised me 40...must be because I was a non believer

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
The fella clearly considers 'the troops' British as much as he considers himself British, hence the use of the possessive 'our'.

Who are you fighting for when you fight exactly? (in your mind, not your paymasters)

oioioi wrote:

Whoever's paying his wage.

Surely any guys gonna want a red hot whore not 40 fridge freezers :p

Surely any guys gonna want a red hot whore not 40 fridge freezers :p

Stage or real; It is being used as propoganda and fuel for immigration reform. And you love it.

I make it a rule never to wish harm on anybody, but if you go out and try to assault or terrorise some innocent muslim family, then I hope that before you succeed, you get neutralised. I only hope this for the sake of millions of law abiding muslim people so that they escape your thuggery.

I didn't say I thought the shoot-out was staged - I asked the question, stating I didn't know. I'd expect you to perhaps know something about the sounds the guns made - well not that specifically that, but maybe something of that nature that might be helpful, rather than just being incredulous that anyone would ask.