knobmeup wrote:
This is how brain-washing works, I believe. I've tried telling myself I've 12 inches repeatedly for many years now though, and it hasn't stuck.

psketti wrote:
There's no other logical conclusion. The prejudice is clearly for propaganda purpose.

Ab Origine wrote:
Yea, but if your over 8.5 inches you automatically loose half your potential partners due to fear of pain.

And if your under 6.5 thoroughbreds wont take you serious because the sensations will be jeopardized.

Well this is specifically speaking for females which in general are more petite than men.

Check out the first 20 seconds of this video.

So fucking busted!


!

psketti wrote:
It really is fake, what the agenda is....idk

psketti wrote:
Was just coming to post this; funny how it presents quite a different picture once ITV have plastered their "exclusivity" on it!

Indeed.


The soliders names been released.

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/frie...e-rigby-8628583.html


It would appear also that today the suspects are now Islamists and not the Afghans they were yesterday.

oioioi wrote:
I noticed that.
It's very similar to Leviticus 24:20 "fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The one who has inflicted the injury must suffer the same injury."

and the press spinning the governments wishes...
"It emerged this afternoon that police are treating the slaying as a 'suspected terrorist attack', with one Whitehall source making unconfirmed claims the attackers were heard to shout 'Allah Akbar'."

knobmeup wrote: I had my suspicions literally as soon as I found out about it. Because I hadn't heard anything about it, and I keep up with what's going on pretty closely, but this was the first I'd heard of it. But the BBC was giving it blanket coverage and Cameron was already speaking about it saying "terrorist, terrorist, terrorist", even though it had only happened an hour ago.

Once you get used to the methods they use, it doesn't take much intelligence to spot them being used.

wake_up_bomb wrote:
Is you saying i is a bit fick wub?

psketti wrote:
It does take armed response longer to arrive apparently.
Which is fucking stupid when somebody who is armed is posing the greatest risk!

knobmeup wrote: I feel quite confident that you would be above average intelligence if tested!

Supposedly unarmed plod arrived earlier but stayed out of sight, so far out of sight they still aren't on the scene once the two blokes are on the floor being detained and a crowd of passers-by are stood around the corpse, not a load of plod

Conclusive proof that Plod and their ilk are pussies. They ain't tooled up, they ain't goin in.
Joe and Jo public on the other hand are inclined to react very much more um reactively? We'll use whatever we have to if we have to.

This is a strength imo.

psketti wrote:
Look at that uniform...

[

oioioi wrote:
The bloodless beheaded corpse (consoled by some woman apparently who got down right next to him and also stood up completely clean of any blood) and the woman with the shopping trolley edited out of the video and ofc we've no idea who the cameraman is with the nice high quality coverage on the scene.
Then we have the cops with no badge numbers yelling get back in the next immediate cut scene with 2 bodies on the deck. Knives all over the place... fuck sake.

Can you trust anything anymore? I mean ANYTHING?

A woman sits down to 'comfort' an headless corpse?

I wonder how long it took them to deduce the supposedly headless corpse was dead!?! Blood being added after the event! NOBODY appearing to be traumatised.

All that stuff that didn't add up in Sandy Hook.

I didn't see a lot of talk of it here, but there was stacks & stacks of stuff brought to light that pointed to the Boston bombing scenario being a set up too - a man filmed getting 'victims' crouching about on the street to co-operate while he tipped a cloth full of powdery stuff over them to make it appear they were coated in explosion debris, etc etc etc.

I'm still not entirely sure what the frick's going on, but the way people were talking about this decapitation at work today, the answer is yes, most people wouldn't think of questioning the validity of what the media tells them. In fact something they were up in arms about, which I haven't come across here (unless I've just missed it) was that the policeman who shot them has been suspended for it - they were all sympathising with him for it.

Some of you think this was fake?

And as for the terrorism bit, well isn't a killing politacly or religiously motivated terrorism? The media and goverment will use it to their own ends but it doesn't mean it isn't real or terror

Sadly for me and all involved, i have first hand experience of the scene when someone loses all of their blood quickly in the road.
My experience was of a very different looking scene to the one shown in the well aired video...

I do recall seeing an aerial shot though and the second or two I saw did show a comparable amount of blood in the road.