I have heard some of his interviews and I think there is something off about him. Has anyone here read any of his books or listened to him talk. I heard one interview where he says that his mother did not have a birth canal and the surgeons had to make one. The interviewer laughed at him when he said this. I then read somewhere else that he also has a sister. He says he was artificially inseminated because his mother did not have a birth canal.

Thanks for the thread Rainy

I'm not aware of Swerdlow so here's a couple of vids I've just turned up on him.

actually, here's his Ewetube channel > https://www.youtube.com/user/stewartswerdlow?feature=watch

RainStick wrote:

Perhaps he heard her wrong.
She probably said she wished she didn't have a birth canal.

I have been trying to find that interview but have had no luck. It mentions the birth canal or lack of a birth canal. I am beginning to wish his mother didnt' have one myself the more I look.


www.angelfire.com/oz/cv/nmolloy1.html

Wondering if the guy is a scam artist?
Wonder no more.

Follow the money, always!

Sexuality, Ritual and Relationships

When a male and a female human have intimate relations with each other, what happens is an re-enactment of God-Mind sending energy to a physical reality, for the purpose of manifesting something. [...]
PRICE: | $ 495.00
more

Yeah....it's called a embryo and Stewie wants you to fork out $495 to tell you that?

feather wrote:

Good guy complete fantacist but good guy. Hes got his get out clause if nothing happens in 2012 as he says it may happen between 2012 and 2015 so more time to fleace the sheeple of the truth movement.

Full of bollocks but at least he has found a way to make a living doing something that excites him.

feather wrote:

Hes full of shit but clevour way to make money.

nirvana wrote:
That's so true, but sad that people are so gullible to believe him.

ftil wrote:

People are desperate to know the truth {any truth} everyones looking for answers. most of truth/conspiracy movement has large pyramid structures .


Top level the nwo which we are all fighting against
Next level the elites who change,modify,manipulate the history and truth so its filters down to the truth movement
Next level secrete societies who manipulate people like Joradan Maxwell to manipulate the truth repeaters .
Next level Jordan maxwel the one who gives Icke etc their research
Next level truth speaker repeaters { most parrot and copy from Jordan Maxwell }
Next level agents publishers etc
The bottom level you have truth sheeple




A song to represent the truth movement.

nirvana wrote:

Well said. Sadly, it is true. I have been reading a post of a member on Camelot forum.
I enjoy reading his posts and I want to share it here. Quite insightful comments how it has been done.

These kinds of questions really need to be asked, although perhaps not in such a dialectical way, ie; 'truth' vs 'lie' - but this concept is basically what I've been banging on about for the last 6 months, and there is certainly a kind of basic dialectic involved too. I could write an entire book about this one concept, and it would still be incomplete, although I will try to keep it relatively succinct here.

There is no question that the 'mainstream' of the truth movement, ie; Alex Jones, Jesse Ventura, Luke Rudowski, the 9/11 truth movement, the global W.A.C movement, the US patriot/christian network and many of its stalwarts, and most probably David Icke - are, as a whole - an authorized phenomenon. That is to say that they've either been vetted and selected, or perhaps even trained, to fulfill various roles in this transitory period. When it comes to the soft-core, super-mainstream and vigorously promoted pundits like Julian Assange and Michael Moore - it is obvious that they are working for the establishment and they know it full well, despite whatever illusions they may have about the 'greater good' etc.

As 'the Pope of Freemasonry' Albert Pike said; ''we will always give the people their heroes''. Further dialogue from Pike and similar characters goes on to say that the public, rebellious champions are always selected and prepared before there is even a need for one. If they know that there is likely to be public resistance or some kind of backlash over a future move on the 'grand chessboard', they get their heroes ready and start promoting them before the move is made. Take AJ for example, who started making a name for himself and garnered a growing audience years before 9/11, so that when it did happened - the people already had someone to turn to and lead them. Since then, you'll notice that people like AJ have encountered little or no resistance in their crusade against tyranny, and have risen to almost mainstream status; unlike others who've either been killed or have come up against very serious opposition.

The matter that often gets overlooked though, is that excluding David Icke; the information they promote is almost always documented fact, which can be proven and corroborated. The crux is in the way it is delivered, and the cultural narrative through which it is promoted and communicated. It's about the way they encourage people to think and feel about the problems, although in most cases it's the latter. It is entirely possible to tell nothing but the truth, and verbally promote critical thinking; and yet still disable people from becoming empowered and critical in their thought - by constantly attaching various emotions and cultural memes to the information. The list of psychological techniques is almost endless, but most of them are designed to put the individual in a state of emotive reasoning. The establishment's psychological knowledge is far beyond our own, and far beyond that of academia in most cases, but a simple fact which they always use to their advantage, is that people make their decisions based on deep-seated emotional factors, the subconscious feelings which have been instilled into us from various life experiences and the concepts which are constantly embedded into us through all forms of media. Fear, anxiety, anger and frustration are obviously the main ones, but people can also be pacified and disarmed from doing anything at all.

This technique which is often used especially in the mainstream, is achieved by presenting real information - but in an 'entertainment' format, so that the truth becomes indecipherable from fiction, and the audience begins to see real facts in the same way they see a hollywood blockbuster; with intellectual apathy. Jesse Ventura's 'Conspiracy Theory' would definitely fit into this, as would some of the more 'edgy' news specials on various things like Chemtrails or Vaccines. Real info is presented, but it leaves you with a 'tongue and cheek' remark about the subject, where no actual conclusion is reached, and you're prompted to 'consider' that it might all just be crazy nonsense.
Suffice to say, the mainstream elements of the truth movement, those who've been authorized to be there and do their job; are there because they embed us with feelings and general ideas about what the problem is and what we should do about it (or not do about it). They each have their own causes and interpretations, but as long as they are successful in embedding certain concepts into us (which we adopt), and suggesting ideas which the establishment knows it can manage or benefit from, they are left alone and in many cases even promoted. Needless to say, the more heavily something or someone is promoted, the more suspicious and critical we must be. The truth movement is such a wide spectrum, catering to all personality types as well as various world-views and beliefs. In essence though, there are a few basic ideologies that are promoted for us to align ourselves with.

The first basic one; is that which has been predominantly promoted by the various patriot networks, as well as the WAC chapters and other movements with a similar perspective. It focuses on political issues, corruption and conspiracies in governments and private organizations, and things which are documented and provable. For all its talk about the historical, global nature of this predicament, it still basically suggests that 'our' system has only recently been taken over, and that if we can remove the corrupt elements of the existing system, we can return to a more idyllic version of it. Christianity features heavily in this movement and is seen as the ideal format for a conservative, family values based society. Therefore - the motive is to stop the changes in their tracks, and try to reverse history back to a point in time where things were much better. Obviously, different demographics all have their ideas about what that should be, but their collective manifesto is the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and the use of force to combat breeches of the Constution is often suggested, although indirectly. These documents have become a sort of religion for the US truth movement in many ways, which also tie in to the predominant christian outlook, even though the founders said that these documents could only work in an agrarian society.
The second basic one;, is that which is promoted by the various new-age and 'esoteric' factions within the truth movement. The material is far less tangible and it often runs on a kind of spiritual narrative, which often involves issues like 2012, UFOs, Aliens, ancient history, psychedelic and spiritual experience, consciousness and scientific theories. There is a whole spectrum of opinion and interest within this 'faction', but the calibre of solutions which are generally suggested encourage a far more passive outlook, where the changes are welcomed and seen as part of a metaphysical, alchemical process toward a better world. Because the material is often so speculative, and involves esoteric, often mystical concepts; attention is directed away from more tangible issues, and it's not often that this milieu manifests action which affects change in a corporeal manner. People are far more likely to be at home trying to make telepathic contact with aliens, or remote-view an underground base, than they are to be protesting or raising awareness on geopolitical issues.

Thirdly; there is also what you might call another faction which I have termed the 'Occupy' faction, due to its recent christening and emergence into the mainstream - who whilst their hearts are in the right place, seem to be more motivated by fashion, boredom, and a half baked understanding of left-wing ideologies thanks to Moore, Chomsky and Klein. They've grown out of all the various charities and popular movements like 'End Poverty Now' and the various Anti-War movements, and have been given their own narrative which focuses on the inequities of the current system, rather than the corruption of the system itself. Needless to say, it is the largest of the three, as it also condones host of neo-marxist solutions to these inequities, getting support and direction from its mainstream leaders. Due to the popular and ultra-mainstream nature of this faction, they are openly pushing for changes that directly support and augment the agenda, due to their being falsely instilled with positive, egalitarian expectations of socialist politics - which are the basic framework of the NWO.

Now, it's obvious that these ideologies cross over in some ways, and there are many who probably sit on a sliding scale between two of them. There is also the fact that all of them have made some positive contributions to the betterment of humanity in their own ways. Having said that, they all essentially operate on the same dialectic that the political system does - a psychological one which is based on the prohibitive and permissive aspects of the human psyche. Left vs Right, Red Vs Blue, Permissive Vs Prohibitive. And whilst there is truth in them both; one wants to stop the changes, whilst the other is more prone to let them happen (and even support them), each having their reasons and their cultural narrative for doing so.

It's not so much a matter of one being 'truth' and the other being a 'lie', but more a matter of them both being highly promoted cultural memes, which have been put out there as a narrative for people to identify with - concepts which guide the various demographics through changes which have been long in the making. They encourage people to deal with what's happening in a way that disempowers them from making a real difference. It's either sit back, speculate, meditate and wait for your utopia to arrive, or get your guns out and try to 'fight' the bad guys. The former is no problem, and the latter only exacerbates the situation and gives the establishment more of an excuse to expand their control measures.

Every major movement, every people's champion, every culture and it's respective narrative - has been created, nurtured and promoted to motivate one of those basic responses, as they are all based on either spiritual or collective emotional concepts - as opposed to a truly analytical and critical response, on an individual level. True solutions come from the individual rising above everything that has been created for them to buy into and associate themselves with; a process of breaking through all the traps, dead-ends and false solutions that have been laid out of them.

So basically, yes - the truth movement was created by the same people the truth movement rallies against. The 'revelation of the method', as moved into view by 9/11, is something which is necessary at the cusp of two ages, as by revealing it, people are prompted into looking for a new world, trying to save the old world, or not caring. All of these reactions help move progress forward. The architects of this agenda reveal the method so that they are provided with resistance, support, and apathy - all of which guide history forward into the future which they have designed, because all of these reactions (mainly the two opposing ones) can be used in the dialectical process, and as we know, 'progress' is merely a series of dialectics as far as they're concerned. If the world was just ticking along in a stable, non-eventful way, there would be no way they could reshape the world to their version of perfection.

They revealed their method and created opposition against it to create a state of flux. They created new belief systems around that opposition, which all contribute to that state flux. Everything you see around you is contributing to that state of conflict, confusion, instability and flux. It's an alchemical process - everything is melted down into a state of flux, so that it can be reshaped into something new, like a Phoenix rising from the ashes. Without realizing this, you are only allowing your energy to be used to create someone else's 'utopia' - but that doesn't mean that the alchemical process must be stopped. Quite the opposite. Most people want a return to 'their' system without realizing that civilization has never been theirs at all. We've always inhabited an artificial society, at least since the implementation of a monied system, and so we cannot reclaim what was never ours. All we can do is try and create something for ourselves amongst the alchemical changes afoot.

This agenda, this alchemical process has far too much momentum behind it, far too much strength, and far too much planning to be stopped in it's tracks, which is why many of us are encouraged to do just that. Our only hope in this is to try and make positive contributions to what comes out of it. To try and turn the steering wheel instead of stamping on the breaks. The truth movement as a whole, encourages to try and stand in the path of a freight train traveling at 100mph, or to simply step out of the way and go chase some aliens instead. Doing the former will simply mean getting crushed, whilst doing the latter will just lead you into further confusion.
Being a calm trackmaster, who casually changes the train-tracks, sending it off on another route, is more of a realistic solution than anything promoted in the truth movement. IMHO..
camelotforum.org/index.php?option=com_ku...tstart=30&Itemid=164