Burzynski was by no means the first, and he certainly wont be the last. It all depends how good your cure is. The FDA burnt Wilhelm Reich's books and put him in prison. Ernst Krebs Jr, a man who's work has helped me more than anyone else's over the past eight years, was mocked, called a nutter etc, in fact even today his wikipedia entry says:
"His medical claims about these compounds are not supported by scientific evidence and are widely considered quackery"
Burzynski's work is mainly a great refinement of the use of nutrients that Krebs discovered. So of course his treatments had success.
Royal Rife's work was annihilated in a similar fashion to Krebs.
Evangelos Michelakis discovered more recently the effectiveness of dichloroacetate in dramatically reducing tumour sizes, in some cases even total eradication of the tumour. He begged big pharma for funding, and was of course told in no uncertain terms to bugger off. Myself and others had to sit by and watch six people die, as they felt there was no other option but to use themselves as guinea pigs for DCA, in the hope that they might cure themselves, as they'd grown tired waiting for funding for DCA research. There deaths helped others who had also gotten to the point where they had decided to self test, again out of sheer desperation, as it gave them valuable information regarding dosages and side effects. A few million dollars for Michelakis would've allowed him to refine and properly test the treatment, and those people that died might still be alive today.
It seems that big pharma will go to any lengths to destroy anyone that tries to interfere with their cancer party. Why wouldn't they? I've asked people this question many times; Could you come up with a business plan for a new product or service, where even if your clients cant afford the cost, the government of that country will pay for them? You set the price, no questions asked, and if your clients cant afford it... it doesn't even matter. That's what I call a money spinner.
The cancer industry I'm afraid to say is not going away anytime soon, and the numbers of millions they've killed and brought misery to will continue to grow. To quote Dr Rosenow, a staunch Rife supporter, just before he died in 1989: "They simply won't listen."
Friend of mine has just been telling me how his landlady has recently been diagnosed with a wasting disease. After looking it up, she was mortified to discover that many of the symptoms of this disease are similar to those suffering from AIDS related illness.
I fished a bit further and guess what she was being treated for prior to this? Cancer. I pointed out that many of those diagnosed with HIV go on to be treated with cancer medication, which literally tears their immune system to shreds, especially when administered over an indefinite period, such as when someone has received a HIV diagnosis.
This shit be crazy.
What we are today comes from our thoughts of yesterday, and our present thoughts build our life of tomorrow: Our life is the creation of our mind.
The problem is that there quite simply has not been any proper scientific investigation done.
Nor will there be if theres no corporate grants for it and we all know how that works.
So there's the obvious 'not scientifically proven' badge that can be applied to just about anything.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.
Re: Cure for Cancer Is Forbidden
07 Jul 2012 05:44 #9
Burzynski was by no means the first, and he certainly wont be the last. It all depends how good your cure is. The FDA burnt Wilhelm Reich's books and put him in prison. Ernst Krebs Jr, a man who's work has helped me more than anyone else's over the past eight years, was mocked, called a nutter etc, in fact even today his wikipedia entry says:
"His medical claims about these compounds are not supported by scientific evidence and are widely considered quackery"
Burzynski's work is mainly a great refinement of the use of nutrients that Krebs discovered. So of course his treatments had success.
Royal Rife's work was annihilated in a similar fashion to Krebs.
Evangelos Michelakis discovered more recently the effectiveness of dichloroacetate in dramatically reducing tumour sizes, in some cases even total eradication of the tumour. He begged big pharma for funding, and was of course told in no uncertain terms to bugger off. Myself and others had to sit by and watch six people die, as they felt there was no other option but to use themselves as guinea pigs for DCA, in the hope that they might cure themselves, as they'd grown tired waiting for funding for DCA research. There deaths helped others who had also gotten to the point where they had decided to self test, again out of sheer desperation, as it gave them valuable information regarding dosages and side effects. A few million dollars for Michelakis would've allowed him to refine and properly test the treatment, and those people that died might still be alive today.
It seems that big pharma will go to any lengths to destroy anyone that tries to interfere with their cancer party. Why wouldn't they? I've asked people this question many times; Could you come up with a business plan for a new product or service, where even if your clients cant afford the cost, the government of that country will pay for them? You set the price, no questions asked, and if your clients cant afford it... it doesn't even matter. That's what I call a money spinner.
The cancer industry I'm afraid to say is not going away anytime soon, and the numbers of millions they've killed and brought misery to will continue to grow. To quote Dr Rosenow, a staunch Rife supporter, just before he died in 1989: "They simply won't listen."
Bursynski was by no means the only one who found cure for Cancer, many have done so, and keep doing it, but is hidden from all of us, so they can keep their business running without competition. A forum webmaster we know, that does the same comes to mind...
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity.
The problem is that there quite simply has not been any proper scientific investigation done.
Nor will there be if theres no corporate grants for it and we all know how that works.
So there's the obvious 'not scientifically proven' badge that can be applied to just about anything.
Right!. A generalization to hide the truth
A love letter to the NSA agent who is monitoring my online activity.
Sorry Ab's mate. I am going to post it all soon. I tend not to present information to the best of my abilities when I'm issed on wine, beer and bbq ribs
I originally posted re Paul Berg and AIDS back in March, and honestly, the AIDS wikipedia page has been subjected to a complete friggin rewrite since then. I only get about 4/500 views a month on my blog, so I presumed someone with slightly larger readership than mine must have reposted the entry (which happens a lot). But nobodies ripped it. It does sound a wee bit hard to believe that my small blog, tucked away in the deepest darkest corner of the internets could have been a catalyst for such vigorous revision of the page, but that's what it looks like at the moment. The blog has pissed off a few people over the past three years (mostly politicians ) but I really am finding it hard to believe that any of those bods I've pissed on would bother to keep track of new entries. Ok, so maybe someone just decided to rewrite it for no apparent reason. Hmmm. Yeah right.
If you whack this into google, which was from the original text from wikipedia as it stood in March:
"HIV descends from the related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), which infects apes and monkeys in Africa. There is evidence that humans who participate in bushmeat activities, either as hunters or as bushmeat vendors, commonly acquire SIV."
As you will see, all that exists are pages that copied that text from wikipedia pre March 2012.
Under Origins you now get this
Both HIV-1 and HIV-2 are believed to have originated in non-human primates in West-central Africa and were transferred to humans (a process known as zoonosis) in the early 20th century.[7] HIV-1 appears to have originated in southern Cameroon through the evolution of SIV(cpz), a simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) that infects wild chimpanzees (HIV-1 descends from the SIVcpz endemic in the chimpanzee subspecies Pan troglodytes troglodytes).[171][172] The closest relative of HIV-2 is SIV(smm), a virus of the sooty mangabey (Cercocebus atys atys), an Old World monkey living in litoral West Africa (from southern Senegal to western Ivory Coast).
Some bollocks about Cameroon and chimpanzees.
I'm gonna dig up some more stuff on Mr Berg, have already made some tracks there this week. Other related pages on wikipedia have been edited as well, hence my suspicion, however bonkers it sounds. The entry for Gilead has been edited, as have all the others I mentioned in my original blog entry, except for just one that remained the same. At the time I wrote that entry, I wasn't even looking for Paul Berg, I was just using wikipedia to highlight all the stuff and nonsense in the mainstream about that subject (wikipedia's great for that isn't it )
20 minutes on wikipedia as it stood back in March lead me to Berg, who imho is a very, very important and incredibly overlooked character in the whole AIDS story. I'd go as far as to call him 'The Daddy of HIV'
If anyone were to do the same as I did a few months back, today, it would be quite difficult to so easily find all the connections so quickly. Which is nice.
Anyway, this is the video I watched that originally sparked my interest:
If anyone else want to do a 'Paul Berg' dig, here are some good starting points:
Beckman Center
Stanford University School of Medicine
Gilead Sciences
Burroughs-Wellcome (GSK)
AZT (The time between the first demonstration that AZT was active against HIV in the laboratory and its approval was 25 months, one of the shortest periods of drug development in recent history) <<<< ( from the wiki page that remained the same, wait ....... oops, no sorry, just checked now, it's been buggered as well, what a shock. Un fecking believable.)
/\/\/\ Berg is connected implicitly to all of the above.
Thank you bw. I won't quote it but don't go deleting it.
Excellent investigamating by the by.
Cheers again for sharing.
Edit: Where can I have a nose around this blog of which you speak? Can you pm me if you don't want to share on here? Ta. There is also at least one HIV thread on here you may like to add your expertise to as well, or start one for yourself.
What we are today comes from our thoughts of yesterday, and our present thoughts build our life of tomorrow: Our life is the creation of our mind.
I will certainly have a look at the AIDS thread. I did promise an update to our fluoride thread, still haven't gotten round to it, tut tut. In fairness I have been busy this week perfecting my no aluminium deodorant My armpits smell of cinnamon and are very soft. (You know you feel comfortable with the people on a forum when you have no qualms about mentioning the state of your own armpits).
Anyways.... chandrakavi's original topic, cancer. An apple a day, keeps the doctor away....
This is true, but don't forget to eat the seeds as well. They give your pancreas a real break, and help it to prevent cancer.
Apple seeds contain amygdalin. Amygdalin consists of a cyanide molecule, benzaldehyde molecule and two glucose molecules. It is a balanced stable natural substance. When it comes into contact with the type of cells that can become cancerous, the naughty cell says oooh yummy give me glucose, and is then killed by the cyanide. (That's an exceptionally simplified explanation, as I haven't got time to go into the ins and outs of mitochondria right now). The whole lot is then excreted via the urinary tract. Your pancreas releases enzymes that do pretty much exactly the same thing. Overworking the pancreas by eating and drinking shite could mean that it fails to produce enough of those essential enzymes. End result, cancer.
Something I find highly amusing is the following, you can find similar information on most 'official' cancer websites:
Laetrile contains cyanide, which is a type of poison. So the side effects of laetrile are the same as those of cyanide.
Now first of all, I typed in AMYGDALIN into their search field, not Laetrile, however, all official cancer websites mostly redirect to a page about Laetrile. This is because it is the only half arsed way they can hope to debunk amygdalin. They babble on about Laetrile containing cyanide and being poisonous for that reason, but here's the truth:
If amygdalin were poisonous, because of cyanide, How is that apples, cherries, plums, apricots, and many other fruits are and have been for centuries consumed with nobody dropping dead from cyanide poisoning? Surely when you go into Tesco, the apples should have big warning stickers all over them saying "DONT EAT THE SEEDS, YOU WILL DIE, CONTAINS CYANIDE".
Laetrile was just an unsuccessful attempt at a man made version of amygdalin. Why? Because the cancer industry wouldn't support something natural that couldn't be patented.
If a person shoots someone in the head, then claims that they didn't realise there were any bullets in the gun, would the judge still send that person to prison for murder? (maybe not in the uk) Ignorance of the fact that there were bullets in the gun does not beget innocence. The person in question should have checked for bullets beforehand, if there were no intention to commit murder.
There are millions of people working in the cancer industry, and the sad fact is that 99% probably don't even realise there is a gun, let alone any knowledge of bullets.
For the odd 1% that have the unpleasant experience of discovering a fucking massive gun filled with millions of bullets, there is the medical industries own special poison arrow. Those unlucky enough not to dodge it end up being remembered like this:
The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....
With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...
In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...
Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021,
in USD.
No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.
) but I really am finding it hard to believe that any of those bods I've pissed on would bother to keep track of new entries. Ok, so maybe someone just decided to rewrite it for no apparent reason. Hmmm. Yeah right.
