random screening shows everyone tested was infected with the same biological components that show up in morgellons sufferers

i'll watch it mart, but they look like goofy hippies. its 62 minutes.. can you explain that everyone was found with the same components, why they aren't just normal component?

tl;dr we are the walking dead.

Anybody with an ounce of sense will understand that the human race will not be lasting to far into the future as a race.

humanspirit wrote:
Not sure about that...we've lasted a not too bad amount of time thus far. We've been through the ice age, countless wars, diseases and all that crap, and we're still going strong, in fact there's more of us than ever before if you believe stats and things. Whether there's so many of us that would require depopulation, I don't know.

Perhaps the human race as we know it won't be lasting too far into the future...transhumanism...

I don't really buy a depopulation agenda.

humanspirit wrote:
Will you be having Misanthropy fries with you Nihilism burger today, sir?

Very good, sir. the Doom sauce is right over there.

And don't forget our Everybody-Sucks-But-Me special offer.

www.independent.co.uk/news/world/america...ce-1920-8371205.html

www.valuewalk.com/2012/11/fertility-rate...nexpected-countries/

theportugalnews.com/news/birth-rate-at-record-low/27138

An IMF working paper published this August highlighted that, due to a combination of rising life expectancy and a low fertility rate, the old-age dependency ratio would rise from around 18% in 2010 to 36% by 2050.

www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversati...s-pensions-time-bomb

www.4-traders.com/news/Bank-of-Japan-Res...-in-Japan--15468590/

This is all 100% real.

andy...does that mean we're living longer, but having less kids?

irrepressible wrote:
Alot more people are having sex and making babies on earth then there are people dying...

This is a trend that will continue...

irrepressible wrote:
Only slightly longer and only in the developed countries.
Population is predicted to peak somewhere between 2040 and 2050 and thereafter rapidly decline.
If current fertility rates remain the same then we're looking at extinction, let alone depopulation.

That might seem quite an extreme statement from the likes of me but fertility rates as low as seen in places like japan for example have historically never been reversed.

.......... wrote:
Again a careless assumption.
You're assuming that all the extra babies born actually live to adulthood.
I have a surprise for you...they don't.

The only people having more than 2.1 kids to maintain population levels are in the 3rd world and they are predominantly dying off early due to malnutrition, infections/disease etc.

As the UN demographers have stated with the facts to back it up, the population WILL reach a peak in 2040-2050 and thereafter decline.

Ofc not many people give a shit beyond whats going to happen tomorrow or what they can see outside their window.

andyh wrote: "This is a trend that will continue…"

Why will the population reach a peak in 2040 - 2050? And why will it thereafter decline? Are they saying it will remain in a state of decline?

Why?

google bot apocalypse

irrepressible wrote:
There is a lag between the time when fertility rates are low and when there is an affect on numbers, this is called 'population momentum' see here- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_momentum

Ofc the boom years require 60 years or so to see the die off.

The main noticeable decline thats happening at the moment is in japan and russia, where very soon they will not have the population levels required to maintain the old populations pensions as the taxation would have to be ridiculously high.
Politicians in Japan and Russia have this issue #1 on their list, you can take that to the bank
They are seriously shit scared, ofc if they're old enough now then it'll always be someone elses problem

Russias mortality rate is over 16 per 1000.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortality_rate

www.csmonitor.com/World/2012/0214/Putin-...th-babies-immigrants

If current trends continue, Russia's population will drop from 143 million to 107 million by 2050.

Maybe he plans to dope food with aphrodisiacs or summat

The reason why its unlikely to change is obvious, women are in the workplace, costs of having a family have gone through the roof, people are scared shitless of having their kids taken by the SS etc anyway, then there's all the pressure of having kids to take them to school etc etc etc.
Since when does our modern culture encourage such sacrifice?

Childcare costs are often more than the woman could earn in many cases too....

Recipe for disaster basically, you can add to that the crap in the food, the air and the water, the declining health, lack of exercise, obesity, immigration from many countries putting pressure on people to hold on to jobs desperately and for lower wages, along with the declining numbers in eastern eu states just adding to their fertility problems.

All this was planned and all of this is the result we see today and there you have your depopulation right under everyones noses without them even realising it.

Impressive tbh...in a sick way.

andyh wrote:
Ok point taken...IDK...Maybe...
andyh wrote:
Before we can even imagine 2040-2050 it's important to make note of medical tech, Stem Cells, ect...

Do you really trust the UN demographers ability to look that far down the road...

Maybe I should have kids soon

If it was planned, then we shouldn't worry about extinction...unless it's an accidental extinction, if they got their maths wrong or something.

By 2040, the people might have prevailed and overthrown the psychos

Also the words "predicted" and "if"...need I say more?

andyh wrote:
When you say all this is planned you imply that every addiction, drugs, alcohol,food (obesity) is pre planned.

Where is the human responsibility to avoid addiction...

idk...

humanspirit wrote: Not so imo:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_...pulation_growth_rate

quite an interesting trend I think you'd agree in that growth rate graph, i'd say depopulation has been going on for many years, the World Wars were an example, Africa, Australia, America have all been past examples, Eurasia is a current example

seems the decline in european/caucasian countries/northern hemisphere countries is purely natural

.......... wrote:
Thats assuming the tech you mention emerges and has an effect on a large amount of the population before the date mentioned.
Quite a tall order looking at how poor we're all becoming even in western countries right now and how state healthcare is probably going to be sacrificed on the altar of austerity.