Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Member feedback is appreciated! Don't be shy and drop us a note. We want to hear from you and strive to make our site better and more user friendly for our members.

TOPIC: dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe's very own mega thread of doom

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 17:11 #121

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91
.......... wrote:
@ feather, :carryon:

Would i be wrong to call for a community vote to get rid of the :roll: emoticon from Sanctum Zone?

As long as you wouldn't have a problem with me replacing it with this...









Rolleyes
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Space Bandit

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 17:13 #122

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91
dreadnaught wrote:
oioioi wrote:
Again for dubs...
oioioi wrote:
Ok, let's recap....

A number of people have complained about doom threads, yesterday one of these complaints was directed at me asking what I intended to do as a moderator. I pointed out I am not a mod as I do not moderate and deflected the issue back to the forum via this thread. The 'general consensus', of which you were one, was to have a megathread, I made one in Vent. There were some objections to it being in Vent, of which one was yours if I understood correctly, so I moved it temporarily, as stated (yet disbelieved by you), as there was/is far from a 'general consensus' on where it belongs and Dreadnaught declined to state where he would like it to go.

Now, to recap on your objection...it's in Have a Laugh?
I can move it every day to one of the suggested destinations until a conclusive decision is reached if that'll help.

My 'unilateral' decision was to move it from Vent to Have a Laugh. Ignoring the fact that my 'unilateral' decision was to put it in Vent, you objected to that, I moved it, you objected to that. Your constructive criticism however has been non-existent.

If I was somehow selling out my anarchist principles I'd be using my position to threaten Dreadnaught with suspensions etc. based on my personal dislike of him, not handing that authority back to the forum when one of it's members expects me to 'moderate' and then facilitating the carrying out of the wishes of the members.

So, back on topic, where should the megathread go?

earth matters....cause the quakes are coming...and the global coastal flooding...OK...?

Sorted. Earth matters it is.

Obviously I'm abusing my 'power' again (the rush of moving threads is amazing!) because you've not all had chance to object to it without offering an alternative solution.
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: andyh

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 17:16 #123

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
oioioi wrote:
dreadnaught wrote:
oioioi wrote:
Again for dubs...
oioioi wrote:
Ok, let's recap....

A number of people have complained about doom threads, yesterday one of these complaints was directed at me asking what I intended to do as a moderator. I pointed out I am not a mod as I do not moderate and deflected the issue back to the forum via this thread. The 'general consensus', of which you were one, was to have a megathread, I made one in Vent. There were some objections to it being in Vent, of which one was yours if I understood correctly, so I moved it temporarily, as stated (yet disbelieved by you), as there was/is far from a 'general consensus' on where it belongs and Dreadnaught declined to state where he would like it to go.

Now, to recap on your objection...it's in Have a Laugh?
I can move it every day to one of the suggested destinations until a conclusive decision is reached if that'll help.

My 'unilateral' decision was to move it from Vent to Have a Laugh. Ignoring the fact that my 'unilateral' decision was to put it in Vent, you objected to that, I moved it, you objected to that. Your constructive criticism however has been non-existent.

If I was somehow selling out my anarchist principles I'd be using my position to threaten Dreadnaught with suspensions etc. based on my personal dislike of him, not handing that authority back to the forum when one of it's members expects me to 'moderate' and then facilitating the carrying out of the wishes of the members.

So, back on topic, where should the megathread go?

earth matters....cause the quakes are coming...and the global coastal flooding...OK...?

Sorted. Earth matters it is.

Obviously I'm abusing my 'power' again (the rush of moving threads is amazing!) because you've not all had chance to object to it without offering an alternative solution.

Can we have a section called draining the catheter?
/churlish grin
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 17:16 #124

  • dreadnaught
  • dreadnaught's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Cathcunt
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 277
  • Thank you received: 22
  • Karma: 0
Mike wrote:
It's ridiculous that SOD trolls get banned yet this guy get;s to hang around, cathar stopped being entertaining years ago, you should ban him and reinstate sod, he at least had entertainment value.

Hey I'm not going to be around that much anyway...Bann me for what.?..Not being entertaining ?Being too intelligent...?

posting the parahawking vid that everybody liked but noone thanked me for.........?
Doom isn't entertaining..But It's coming...Get over it...:
Last Edit: 16 Apr 2013 17:17 by dreadnaught.
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 17:21 #125

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
dreadnaught wrote:
Mike wrote:
It's ridiculous that SOD trolls get banned yet this guy get;s to hang around, cathar stopped being entertaining years ago, you should ban him and reinstate sod, he at least had entertainment value.

Hey I'm not going to be around that much anyway...Bann me for what.?..Not being entertaining ?Being too intelligent...?

posting the parahawking vid that everybody liked but noone thanked me for.........?
Doom isn't entertaining..But It's coming...Get over it...:

You're definitely very entertaining, like the time you said we only got mag 8 earthquakes once every 20 years, its also an opportunity to spam 'will the wind be so mighty' vids every other post.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:06 #126

  • Gilly
  • Gilly's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Psychic Assassin
  • Posts: 11225
  • Thank you received: 6506
  • Karma: 99
Hmmm...

Pensive


Don't disturb me for a while - I'm trying to think of a way of disagreeing with EVERYBODY who's posted here.





:D




Here's a thought that's been on my mind a bit.

Why continue to pretend that new members are coming here with a clean slate, when they clearly are not? What do people think of deleting that ethic? Or applying it genuinely - one or the other.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
Last Edit: 16 Apr 2013 18:20 by Gilly.
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:22 #127

  • dubmeup
  • dubmeup's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3239
  • Thank you received: 2296
  • Karma: 0
That's the most sensible thing I've seen posted in here gilly.

Why not drop the pretense once and for all? It's clear that some folk are exempt from the rule so why not just fuck the rule off?

In fact why not just drop any thoughts of it being a sanctum zone?
"laws are unenforceable if the majority break them."-humanspirit,
"avoid the concept of an ambassador for truth altogether"-gilly.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gilly

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:23 #128

  • feather
  • feather's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • I got 99 problems being Merv ain't one.
  • Posts: 9557
  • Thank you received: 9419
  • Karma: 93
.......... wrote:
@ feather, :carryon:

Would i be wrong to call for a community vote to get rid of the :roll: emoticon from Sanctum Zone?
Feel free.
You stated your preference, I stated mine.
I'm fine with it being put to a vote.

Good luck with that. :)
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:26 #129

  • dubmeup
  • dubmeup's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3239
  • Thank you received: 2296
  • Karma: 0
oioioi wrote:
knobmeup wrote:
Again oi for one of two reasons you are avoiding my point.

You wanted to vent dreadnaught posts, when you couldn't do that you stuck them in the equally insulting have a laugh section.
With no agreement from anyone.

I see that as an abuse of position. Not a huge one by most people's standards ofc but an abuse all the same.

If you cqn show me how the rules have been breached by dreadnaught and where it says those breaches mean your threads cqn be stuck somewhere insulting arbitrarily, i'll concede I am wrong.

If someone posts predictions for the future in the history section we need a rule to say I can move it?
:roll:

I partly resolved the issue according to the 'general consensus', megathread it. I megathreaded his threads.
I now wait for the general consensus on where it belongs rather than where it doesn't belong.
Until then I'll put it in the category of your choosing because I don't personally give a fuck where it goes. I suspect you'll not nominate a category. :)

Swerved again ;) tbf to me I already did post a suggested category....members chat.

So there was no personal motive for you first suggesting vent and then actually sticking it in have a laugh then....mmmmmk ;)
"laws are unenforceable if the majority break them."-humanspirit,
"avoid the concept of an ambassador for truth altogether"-gilly.
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:30 #130

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91
knobmeup wrote:
oioioi wrote:
knobmeup wrote:
Again oi for one of two reasons you are avoiding my point.

You wanted to vent dreadnaught posts, when you couldn't do that you stuck them in the equally insulting have a laugh section.
With no agreement from anyone.

I see that as an abuse of position. Not a huge one by most people's standards ofc but an abuse all the same.

If you cqn show me how the rules have been breached by dreadnaught and where it says those breaches mean your threads cqn be stuck somewhere insulting arbitrarily, i'll concede I am wrong.

If someone posts predictions for the future in the history section we need a rule to say I can move it?
:roll:

I partly resolved the issue according to the 'general consensus', megathread it. I megathreaded his threads.
I now wait for the general consensus on where it belongs rather than where it doesn't belong.
Until then I'll put it in the category of your choosing because I don't personally give a fuck where it goes. I suspect you'll not nominate a category. :)

Swerved again ;) tbf to me I already did post a suggested category....members chat.

So there was no personal motive for you first suggesting vent and then actually sticking it in have a laugh then....mmmmmk ;)

If you can show me where I said he'd breached the rules you'd have a point worth addressing.
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:35 #131

  • diamondgeezer
  • diamondgeezer's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3032
  • Thank you received: 1504
  • Karma: 89
Gilly wrote:
Here's a thought that's been on my mind a bit.

Why continue to pretend that new members are coming here with a clean slate, when they clearly are not? What do people think of deleting that ethic? Or applying it genuinely - one or the other.

That's one of the things I like/respect about you gilly - you're honest. :)

The 'clean slate' policy was originally my idea...part of the SZ dream (& I don't regret giving it a fair chance either)....but in reality, I have to admit it hasn't worked, from day one.

Something to do with human nature perhaps....
truth-zone.co.uk/ - the other place...

The pen is mightier than the sword
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gilly

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:40 #132

  • dubmeup
  • dubmeup's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3239
  • Thank you received: 2296
  • Karma: 0
So oi, to get things clear... what is the justification for your action here if there has been no rule breach?

Megathread is just housework, I've already said I get that...but in the absence of any rule breach, what is it that empowers you to stick pretty much the entirety of a member's posts in a section that is clearly meant to insult them?
"laws are unenforceable if the majority break them."-humanspirit,
"avoid the concept of an ambassador for truth altogether"-gilly.
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:44 #133

  • wake_up_bomb
  • wake_up_bomb's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 5063
  • Thank you received: 4418
  • Karma: 56
Gilly wrote:
What do people think of deleting that ethic?
I never agreed with it in the first place, it's completely impossible, and anyone that behaved immaturely on the DIF will continue to behave immaturely here. It's absolutely guaranteed. It's not as if those that people are weary of haven't had a second chance, they've usually had millions of chances, and never shown any signs of changing their conduct whatsoever. There is more than one person I could cite, but I will leave people to make their own mind up about it.

That wasn't meant as a criticism of DG, it was a noble concept, I just have little faith in the best of human nature, and none in the middling to bottom of the barrel.
The true measure of a man is not his intelligence or how high he rises in this freak establishment. The true measure of a man is this: how quickly he can respond to the needs of others and how much of himself he can give - Philip K. Dick.
Last Edit: 16 Apr 2013 18:45 by wake_up_bomb.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gilly

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:46 #134

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91
knobmeup wrote:
So oi, to get things clear... what is the justification for your action here if there has been no rule breach?

Megathread is just housework, I've already said I get that...but in the absence of any rule breach, what is it that empowers you to stick pretty much the entirety of a member's posts in a section that is clearly meant to insult them?

What is my justification for putting it in Have a laugh? I'd already put one of his threads in there after he'd posted it in somewhere inappropriate (at least nobody found it appropriate enough to suggest in this thread), you and '.........' were on about his freedom of speech being violated by it being in vent so I moved it to the same section temporarily (as stated). He didn't take offense the first time I moved one there, neither did you.
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:48 #135

  • dubmeup
  • dubmeup's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3239
  • Thank you received: 2296
  • Karma: 0
What's your solution though wub?

Do we vet new members?
Do we let arguments from elsewhere fill this place up?
"laws are unenforceable if the majority break them."-humanspirit,
"avoid the concept of an ambassador for truth altogether"-gilly.
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:51 #136

  • dubmeup
  • dubmeup's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3239
  • Thank you received: 2296
  • Karma: 0
oioioi wrote:
knobmeup wrote:
So oi, to get things clear... what is the justification for your action here if there has been no rule breach?

Megathread is just housework, I've already said I get that...but in the absence of any rule breach, what is it that empowers you to stick pretty much the entirety of a member's posts in a section that is clearly meant to insult them?

What is my justification for putting it in Have a laugh? I'd already put one of his threads in there after he'd posted it in somewhere inappropriate (at least nobody found it appropriate enough to suggest in this thread), you and '.........' were on about his freedom of speech being violated by it being in vent so I moved it to the same section temporarily (as stated). He didn't take offense the first time I moved one there, neither did you.

I have neither the time inclination or bandwidth to check every thread oi. I had no clue you'd put one of his threads there.
The question remains though, what empowers you to make decisions like that which are clearly a piss take?
To make it easier, just reference the first thread you put there if you like...what gives you the 'right' to use your position to poke fun at people in that way?
"laws are unenforceable if the majority break them."-humanspirit,
"avoid the concept of an ambassador for truth altogether"-gilly.
Last Edit: 16 Apr 2013 18:52 by dubmeup.
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:52 #137

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 2786
  • Thank you received: 362
  • Karma: 0
wake_up_bomb wrote:

That wasn't meant as a criticism of DG, it was a noble concept, I just have little faith in the best of human nature, and none in the middling to bottom of the barrel.

I don't understand what's the point in all the stuff you post or being part of a forum if you have little faith in the best of human nature.
"The Great Liberator" aka #1 Anarchist
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:57 #138

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91
knobmeup wrote:
oioioi wrote:
knobmeup wrote:
So oi, to get things clear... what is the justification for your action here if there has been no rule breach?

Megathread is just housework, I've already said I get that...but in the absence of any rule breach, what is it that empowers you to stick pretty much the entirety of a member's posts in a section that is clearly meant to insult them?

What is my justification for putting it in Have a laugh? I'd already put one of his threads in there after he'd posted it in somewhere inappropriate (at least nobody found it appropriate enough to suggest in this thread), you and '.........' were on about his freedom of speech being violated by it being in vent so I moved it to the same section temporarily (as stated). He didn't take offense the first time I moved one there, neither did you.

I have neither the time inclination or bandwidth to check every thread oi. I had no clue you'd put one of his threads there.
The question remains though, what empowers you to make decisions like that which are clearly a piss take?
To make it easier, just reference the first thread you put there if you like...what gives you the 'right' to use your position to poke fun at people in that way?

The 'right'?

Like most in this thread I had no clue where was best suited for one of his doom threads when another member highlighted how his choice of section was clearly a joke, I therefore said as much to him and put it in Have a Laugh, he never objected.
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 18:59 #139

  • dubmeup
  • dubmeup's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3239
  • Thank you received: 2296
  • Karma: 0
Is that an attempt to say it was another member's idea to plump for have a laugh?

It looks like it tbh....

Come on now, you can tell knob...how come you can do and are cool with doing this sort of thing?
"laws are unenforceable if the majority break them."-humanspirit,
"avoid the concept of an ambassador for truth altogether"-gilly.
Last Edit: 16 Apr 2013 19:02 by dubmeup.
The topic has been locked.

dreadnaught/cathcunt/pisspipe'​s very own mega thread of doom 16 Apr 2013 19:01 #140

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
thoreau wrote:

If it had been sketts who had taken the action I am not sure that she would have received the same response.

Ain't that the fucking truth.
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: feather
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.176 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today117
Yesterday421
Week538
Month22073
Total1096832

Your IP Address: 216.73.216.65 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Tuesday, 28 July 2026 07:28

Who Is Online

Guests : 101 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel