andyh wrote:
dogsmilk wrote:
I'm dubious. Like I think
If the children continue to truant and participate in anti social behaviour those under 13 will be taken into care and those over 13 will be expected to work under the same terms as their parents with tutors twice weekly to ensure a basic level of literacy and numeracy.
is actually illegal. Not to mention it costs a lot of money to put children into care - kinda a false economy there.
They also have no power to
make a lot of other services work with them.
But even if it's bullshit,, it's still alarmingly realistic and not that far fetched.
And maybe that's the point.
The next step after increasing retirement age is to decrease the minimum age to work I suppose.
I kinda meant the putting children into care business. The DWP cannot have children put into care because they feel like it.
Home tuition can already happen with children who have issues with school. But it doesn't happen all day five days a week - Local Authorities cannot hire tutors to provide full time education at home because it would cost a fucking fortune. I've known of cases where kids have anxiety issues or whatever that stop them being able to cope with school where there's been something of a battle to get them to cough up any funding for home tuition.
Most kids with persistent school behavioural issues get placed in a Pupil Referral Unit. Which is naughty kids school.
And like
They will not be living with their parents but in dormitory accommodation.
Where? This would flout the National Minimum Standards for children in care in a serious way.
www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrder...dren%27s%20Homes.pdf
You cannot take children into care and put them in dormitories. Any Local Authority that did so (and they'd have to because the DWP cannot) would be guaranteed to lose any lawsuit anyone brought against them. And the public may be learning to hate the poor, but they're still sensitive about children.
The government may be shower of bastards, but I doubt they're about to totally lose the plot.
I also think the whole premise of forcing whole families onto some intensive program or their benefits get stopped would be illegal as things currently stand.
I think it's bullshit. But it's bullshit that manages to sound kinda plausible because the blunt fact is it's not totally way out in what it's saying insofar as it's the kind of mad idea they do actually have IIRC mental case at large IDS seriously wanted to shunt entire families round the country to move them out of deprived areas - whether they wanted to move or not. This e-mail may not be true, but plenty of them would certainly like it to be. Particularly that bit about vouchers instead of cash which is an idea that I think has certainly has been talked about.