mikey mikey wrote:
perhaps this deserves its own thread
It really comes down to what I said previously:
sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/The-Community-Ch...tml?start=240#153537
If you put a two year-old Afro-Caribbean child, a two year-old child from the Asian subcontinent, a two year-old Caucasian child, a two year-old from East Asia, a two year-old Eskimo, and any other two year-old from any ethnic background that you care to name, they will just play together. It's only us sophisticated adults with our precious 'culture' that categorises people based on meaningless distinctions.
Obviously, but for the grace of God, any of us could have been brought up in those circumstances, and any of those people could have been brought up in our circumstances. If that was the case, we would be like them, and they would be like us. It’s as simple as that.
It’s only those that seek to justify their own prejudices that see such cultural distinctions as being meaningful, and indeed an inherent characteristic of certain people(s). This was the basis of a lot of the completely phony justification for the British Empire, and some other imperialism as well. Obviously there is no basis for it in reality, any more than asserting that phrenology is a good way of working out how intelligent someone is.
It does provoke the sort of spurious arguments that Bendoon used to put forward regarding white people being more intelligent than black people whereby he pointed to some map of the world in which average IQs were denoted. Obviously this map didn't take into consideration economic inequality, lack of education, indoctrination, etc, which is the real reason behind marked cultural differences. I'm sure there would still be some difference in a more egalitarian culture, but it would be statistically insignificant.
Anyone with any brain cells knows that we are all born the same, and are all inherently the same, or as close enough to being the same as to make any distinctions no more than pedantry.