Ever since Dr. Anton Mesmer was run out of Vienna in the nineteenth century, we have known of the problems involved in using mesmerism—or hypnosis—as evidence of anything. In the mid-1950s, with the advent of the Bridey Murphy craze, millions of people began hypnotizing each other to explore their past lives. Reincarnation became the subject of the day and, not surprisingly, most of us discovered that we had been noble kings and princesses in another age. The unconscious mind is a notorious prankster and, under hypnosis, delights in producing the kind of information being sought by the hypnotist. In many cases the hypnotized subject is actually able to read the hypnotist's mind and tailor his or her "evidence" to whatever the hypnotist believes in or is seeking! This is why testimony produced by hypnosis is not permitted in a court of law. If the hypnotist believes in ghosts, flying saucers, or some weird political idea, the subject will come up with material to support that belief and will even weave a whole fantasy world around the hypnotist's thoughts. Some of these fantasies can become very elaborate.

When CBS did a TV special on hypnosis back in the 1960s, a television technician was hypnotized on camera and told that CBS executives were conspiring to take over the world. That's all he was told. He immediately launched into a long and very convincing narrative about attending a meeting of the plotters. He described the room where the meeting was held and each man who was there. Then he laid out the whole fiendish plan that was discussed. It was very complex and sounded very real. His unconscious mind had a ball constructing the fantasy and implicating the mild-mannered technician in the evil scheme. Someone tuning into the show late might have been led to believe that CBS was, indeed, getting ready to take over the world.

I keep meaning to mention a great book I read a while ago, called "When Prophecy Fails." It's especially eye opening in relation to he who must not be named. It was published in 1956, but still entirely relevant.. Maybe even more so today.

The PDF is quite hard to track down, but I managed to get it in mobi format and converted it, so if anyone is interested, I can upload it and give the link out via PM

Or alternatively, you can buy it from Amazon.

And here's the wiki.

Yeah, I paid my once in a blue moon visit to there the other day and noticed it had all changed.

Well, on the surface at least

that the terms, "Neo-Nazi", "White supremacist", and "Racist", are terms created by the, Anti Defamation League/Abe Foxman and MSM, for the purposes of, division, destruction, and smear tactics, aimed at white people only

lies about people and make out only white people are racist

Malcom X was in favor of separation as it's the only way out of the MultKULTuralist hellhole many cities in the US have turned into.

"Indigenous" is zio-liberal codeword for "rightful owners" and is only used to refer to non-white populations.

The talk about "Nazis" being racist is one of the biggest lies ever told.

"Neo-Nazi" is a Judaised term, used to demonize any opponent of the multicult cult's agenda

America are racist against Whites.

Fact is Hitler had majority support for much of his political career.

As for these guys in the states wanting to set up a white city I really dont see the problem.

I want to live in a 100% white area

I was mocking the idea that there even is "fascism" in the 21st century. If there were, though, it would probably be better the crap we have now,

Actually an all white town is a good thing.

No crime rate either.

Or is it just those smelly, soft, sick, sociopath white devils?

Can anyone give a valid reason why its wrong for whites to have a territory to themselves?
digitalaghori is offline

TPTB want us all to give up any sense of personal, national, cultural, religious or racial identity. They dislike racial separatists far more than you do.

The most racist group in the world is probably American blacks.

Agreed WUB.

Ofc the DIF does not really make the slightest impact on my life, but the rise of the extreme right across the internet is alarming and history shows that violent militant racist groups do prove very useful ground troops for TPTB.

Greece's Golden Dawn is a good current example.

I posted the previous post, merely because I wished to dispel any notion of a "crackdown" by the Admin there on these clowns. If anything, things have deteriorated.

And recent footage of Daisy and Icke together on YT really makes it hard to believe that David Icke is unaware, let alone opposed to the Stormfrontification of his namesake website.

Since many of us met on DIF, and were kicked out for that reason, it holds some relevance to SZ.

The term 'multicult hellhole' that is banded about so often actually makes me feel violent & sick.
& I'm white!

It's a melting pot etc etc etc
Only when racist tit wrenches stir it up. Wankers.

Apart from when I had a job and they expected me to turn up occasionally...

And recent footage of Daisy and Icke together on YT really makes it hard to believe that David Icke is unaware, let alone opposed to the Stormfrontification of his namesake website.

In his book, In the Name of Science, Martin Gardner defines the characteristics of the common crank or pseudoscientist. He lists the four chief attributes as being: (1) The crank considers himself a genius... even a towering genius who is years ahead of his time. (2) He considers his colleagues and fellow researchers 'ignorant block-heads', largely because they fail to recognize his genius. He assaults his opponents by impugnation, questioning their honesty, intelligence, and motives. They respond in kind, naturally, and so great storms are whipped up in the trivial teacups of the scientific and pseudoscientific journals. Controversy is the lifeblood of crankism. (3) The pseudoscientist is paranoid and feels he is the victim of a vast conspiracy designed to suppress his brilliant work. In many instances these imagined conspiracies become a vital part of the subject itself, as for example, the endless literature discussing how the U.S. Air Force has been keeping the truth about flying saucers from the public. (4) The crank delights in focusing his attacks 'on the greatest scientists and the best-established theories'. He goes after big game. He is wiser than Einstein, knows more about astronomy than Fred Hoyle, and is better informed about the moon than Neil Armstrong.

The crank also invents his own terminology: a jabberwocky understood only by him and his closest allies. So, we find the literature filled with confusing and complicated terms which are merely displays of pseudoerudition, or what psychiatrists call neologisms.

Over the years I have met the leaders of many peculiar cults and pseudoscientific factions of belief. With very few exceptions, they have all lived up to the above criteria. Most were friendly and co-operative with me until they realized that I did not share their beliefs in Atlantis or visitors from Andromeda. Then they turned on me with wrathful vengeance and launched such campaigns of un-founded slander that I could only be amazed and amused. I have now been accused of being everything from a Communist con man to a secret agent for the Central Intelligence Agency; from a religious fanatic (I'm a lifelong agnostic) to a pawn of the devil. Typo-graphical errors, over which I have no control, in my many articles and books have been lovingly dissected by these groups and prompted countless letters and essays reviewing their sinister im-plications. After twenty-five years as a writer and reporter dedicated to collecting the facts as objectively and as honestly as possible, my integrity has been attacked from all angles.

mikey mikey wrote:
Mikey, if you can find the transcripts of the Icke/Royal Admas courtcase (I've looked a few times recently with no luck) you will see Icke openly admitting to scouring his website on a daily basis - 10 hour sermons and copy/paste books not permitting.

The man is a crank and an absolute liar.

Taken from yet another John keel book (Our Haunted Planet, introduction) this quote describes Icke and his ilk to a tee.


Make of that what you will, naturally