Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: David Icke Forum Fraud

David Icke Forum Fraud 26 Nov 2012 22:53 #1

  • leslikely
  • leslikely's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Rank1
  • Posts: 1
  • Thank you received: 1
  • Karma: 0
David Icke Forums Fraud

Here are some facts about David Icke forums to consider before becoming a member.

1........Your posts are altered without your permission or you being aware of it.
On many occasions I have returned to posts I have made weeks or months earlier, only to find my posts were edited in such a way that the original meaning was changed around to mean something altogether different than what was originally posted.
I don't have to tell you how dangerous this is, in this day of arrests being made for things said over the internet. Indeed, some comments made can land you in a government's "terrorist" database.

So, in other words, Forum moderators have the power to alter your posts to suit their own agendas.
The irony here is the webmaster of David Icke Forums, violates his own covenant with membership when he says, "the view expressed in any User Content are the views of the individual authors and not those of us unless specified otherwise by us." Thus, you have the oddity of the Webmaster violating David Icke forum rules.

I have carefully documented many occasions where posts have been altered. I look forward to the day when I can present these findings to a court of law.

2.........Your Instant Messages are NOT private.

Your personal messages to other members are not private. Every IM is monitored by the moderation team.

3........Every Moderator on that form, without exception, has a none-Conservative agenda based viewpoint.

That's because the webmaster has the same. Moderators are selected entirely on that bases. Not by experience, not by their tolerance, not by their adherence to forum policy, not by their ability to get alone with other members.

This is evident in the posts made by forum moderators, and in the discriminatory reprimand handed out.
One need only to look at the Conservative threads, topics and comments, vs the none-conservative topics, threads, and comments. The conservative talk on David Icke forums is almost none exist ant. Why is that?

4........The so called 70,000 members DI forums boasts about, are purely a numbers racket.

DI forums bills it's self as, "a place where controversial subjects can be freely discussed."

Who wouldn't want that, right?

Beware!

People sign up thinking, they can freely discuss controversial subjects. They soon find out, it is the discussion of controversial subjects that get them reprimands from the forum moderators. This is especially true in the political, and religious forums (see #3 above). This is why you will see a great many lurkers on DI forums with a proportionally small amount of actual members who post.

Social networking is still in it's infant stages. It is one of the last frontiers of freedom of expression, and freedom of the press, we have left, and has all the promise of a new awakening for all. Please do not allow David Icke to cheapen, manipulate, and subjugate, this last, great, freedom.

Get vocal!

Expose the fraud!
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Black Cloud

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 26 Nov 2012 23:21 #2

  • dubs
  • dubs's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Goodbye and Goodluck
  • Posts: 5408
  • Thank you received: 2474
  • Karma: 69000000
Welcome les, i take it you're not entirely familiar with this place ;)

to be honest the idea of :seany trying to get me put on a watchlist makes me laff :D
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 26 Nov 2012 23:45 #3

  • LesleyPumpshaft
  • LesleyPumpshaft's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • arse biscuits
  • Posts: 2060
  • Thank you received: 1010
  • Karma: 47
Hey les, I don't think you'll find many people arguing with you about those points. :chuckle:

Nice to meet you. :)
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 00:38 #4

  • Omnisense
  • Omnisense's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Rank1
  • Posts: 54
  • Thank you received: 49
  • Karma: 10
Every IM is mon­i­tored by the mod­er­a­tion team.
I don't think this is true.
Omnisense
my hands are wrinkley. im getting old ( 6:12PM)
I AM ALL I AM
: Bwahahahahahaha ( 6:12PM)
Everyone's hands are wrinkly ( 6:12PM)
Wrinkles come with the hands ;) ( 6:13PM)
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 06:19 #5

  • Gilly
  • Gilly's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Psychic Assassin
  • Posts: 11225
  • Thank you received: 6506
  • Karma: 99
Omnisense wrote:
Every IM is mon­i­tored by the mod­er­a­tion team.
I don't think this is true.

Unless things have changed in the last few years, only Sean has the facility to read PM's - and he strongly denied that until a screen shot was posted of him doing it. At that time, according to Krakhead, the only person who'd known of it was I Am - which is ironic, since her status was actually Premier Subscriber, having resigned herself from the admin team in a huff. :D

He's not good at sharing his toys - I can't imagine him letting anyone else use that software.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 10:24 #6

leslikely wrote:
[...]
3........Every Moderator on that form, without exception, has a none-Conservative agenda based viewpoint.

That's because the webmaster has the same. Moderators are selected entirely on that bases. Not by experience, not by their tolerance, not by their adherence to forum policy, not by their ability to get alone with other members.

This is evident in the posts made by forum moderators, and in the discriminatory reprimand handed out.
One need only to look at the Conservative threads, topics and comments, vs the none-conservative topics, threads, and comments. The conservative talk on David Icke forums is almost none exist ant. Why is that? [...]

Don’t know if I would agree with that, for instance ‘knightgrail’ (or whatever his name is) is both staunchly conservative and a prolific poster, worse still a lot of people takes him seriously and agree with him. This indicates that conservative views are over represented in my view. If anything it’s the left leaning, democratic socialists, liberal positions that are under represented.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: andyh

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 11:33 #7

  • feather
  • feather's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • I got 99 problems being Merv ain't one.
  • Posts: 9557
  • Thank you received: 9419
  • Karma: 93
At one time I would have shrugged and said "Yeah, yeah, it's just a forum, no-one is going to be traumatised,."
But it appears I would have been so wrong.

Seriously, let it go folks, you'll all be fine.
:coffee:

Look on the bright side.
It's not as if there are group shots of you all pouncing about in turquoise tracksuits floating about on the net.
Is there? :umm:
Last Edit: 27 Nov 2012 11:37 by feather.
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 12:03 #8

  • dubs
  • dubs's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Goodbye and Goodluck
  • Posts: 5408
  • Thank you received: 2474
  • Karma: 69000000
In some of our cases, there's far worse than pics of us in turquoise trackys floating about the web :coffee:
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: feather, Gilly

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 12:17 #9

  • Gilly
  • Gilly's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Psychic Assassin
  • Posts: 11225
  • Thank you received: 6506
  • Karma: 99
dubmeup wrote:
In some of our cases, there's far worse better than pics of us in turquoise trackys floating about the web :coffee:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: dubs

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 12:50 #10

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
and Justice for All wrote:
If anything it’s the left leaning, democratic socialists, liberal positions that are under represented.

Predictably, on the Presidential Election arcyclus and a group of other closet-neocons went from unbelievers in the right-wing/left-wing paradigm to supporting a Romney vote.

Fox News and the Daily Mail are often used as news sources.

Right Wing folks like Henry Makow, Jeff Rense and Alex Jones (who ran as a Republican) are quoted regularly and Ron Paul is held up as the saviour of American politics.

Then there are the far-right Nazi, BNP and EDLsupporters...

I would firstly offer my welcome :hi: but if I am to be honest as welll as friendly, I have to say that I think our new friend is what Stephen Colbert was talking about when he said: "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."
thank you St Jude for favours granted
Last Edit: 27 Nov 2012 13:08 by mikey mikey.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: andyh, and Justice for All

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 13:29 #11

Need any more proof? Hmm?

M&M (can I call you that Mikeyx2?) ;) ... thing is that people’s definition of left and right are rather fuzzy nowadays... < that’s my polite way of saying: they don’t have the first clue. Saying that there’s no difference between left and right doesn’t help either. Admittedly, currently there isn’t much of a difference but that doesn’t mean that it was always like that, or that traditionally, left and right policies are one and the same, because they’re not.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: andyh

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 13:32 #12

  • Guevarista
  • Guevarista's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1365
  • Thank you received: 247
  • Karma: 14
and Justice for All wrote:
leslikely wrote:
[...]
3........Every Moderator on that form, without exception, has a none-Conservative agenda based viewpoint.

That's because the webmaster has the same. Moderators are selected entirely on that bases. Not by experience, not by their tolerance, not by their adherence to forum policy, not by their ability to get alone with other members.

This is evident in the posts made by forum moderators, and in the discriminatory reprimand handed out.
One need only to look at the Conservative threads, topics and comments, vs the none-conservative topics, threads, and comments. The conservative talk on David Icke forums is almost none exist ant. Why is that? [...]

Don’t know if I would agree with that, for instance ‘knightgrail’ (or whatever his name is) is both staunchly conservative and a prolific poster, worse still a lot of people takes him seriously and agree with him. This indicates that conservative views are over represented in my view. If anything it’s the left leaning, democratic socialists, liberal positions that are under represented.
You say underrepresented, I'd say suppressed and ousted ;)

Top post there Mikey!

Nice to read your thoughts aswell Justice!
Admit­tedly, cur­rently there isn’t much of a dif­fer­ence but that doesn’t mean that it was always like that, or that tra­di­tion­ally, left and right poli­cies are one and the same, because they’re not.
I totally agree!
The mean­ings that are the most directly prac­ti­cal are the ones that are sac­ri­ficed: the fla­vor, aroma and touch are abol­ished to the profit of the delu­sions that per­ma­nently lead sight and hear­ing astray.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: andyh

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 16:12 #13

  • myshoono
  • myshoono's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 104
  • Thank you received: 42
  • Karma: 13
and Justice for All wrote:
leslikely wrote:
[...]
3........Every Moderator on that form, without exception, has a none-Conservative agenda based viewpoint.

That's because the webmaster has the same. Moderators are selected entirely on that bases. Not by experience, not by their tolerance, not by their adherence to forum policy, not by their ability to get alone with other members.

This is evident in the posts made by forum moderators, and in the discriminatory reprimand handed out.
One need only to look at the Conservative threads, topics and comments, vs the none-conservative topics, threads, and comments. The conservative talk on David Icke forums is almost none exist ant. Why is that? [...]

Don’t know if I would agree with that, for instance ‘knightgrail’ (or whatever his name is) is both staunchly conservative and a prolific poster, worse still a lot of people takes him seriously and agree with him. This indicates that conservative views are over represented in my view. If anything it’s the left leaning, democratic socialists, liberal positions that are under represented.

He was banned though :D

I have noticed something - not just on that forum but pretty much everywhere you get a cross-section of poltical views (left and right): Those who are more right-leaning will always claim their views are suppressed. Those who are more left-leaning will always claim their views are suppressed. And they claim the same thing about the same site. So I wonder if really it's part perception, and only part moderation on either "side".
The material world is merely a tool. And tools can build,but they cannot create.
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 16:51 #14

Don’t know how things are now, haven’t been there for months, but what I remember is that it was getting increasingly and unapologetically right leaning when I was still posting over there, that’s for sure. I wouldn’t think that was a matter of 'perspective', it was what it was; a rightwing nut haven, pro-capitalist, pro-fascist, classist, sexist, racist cesspit.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: thoreau, dubs, andyh, mikey mikey, humanspirit

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 17:12 #15

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
myshoono wrote:
and Justice for All wrote:
leslikely wrote:
[...]
3........Every Moderator on that form, without exception, has a none-Conservative agenda based viewpoint.

That's because the webmaster has the same. Moderators are selected entirely on that bases. Not by experience, not by their tolerance, not by their adherence to forum policy, not by their ability to get alone with other members.

This is evident in the posts made by forum moderators, and in the discriminatory reprimand handed out.
One need only to look at the Conservative threads, topics and comments, vs the none-conservative topics, threads, and comments. The conservative talk on David Icke forums is almost none exist ant. Why is that? [...]

Don’t know if I would agree with that, for instance ‘knightgrail’ (or whatever his name is) is both staunchly conservative and a prolific poster, worse still a lot of people takes him seriously and agree with him. This indicates that conservative views are over represented in my view. If anything it’s the left leaning, democratic socialists, liberal positions that are under represented.

He was banned though :D

I have noticed something - not just on that forum but pretty much everywhere you get a cross-section of poltical views (left and right): Those who are more right-leaning will always claim their views are suppressed. Those who are more left-leaning will always claim their views are suppressed. And they claim the same thing about the same site. So I wonder if really it's part perception, and only part moderation on either "side".

Those of us with anti-establishment or anarchistic leanings were shat upon from a great height tbh, wingnuts of both the right and left flavour didn't like the idea of actually leaving people alone to live their lives in peace without stupid rules and regulations...so much for 'awakened' beings tbh....


That said the RWA type was certainly more prevalent than the left.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
Last Edit: 27 Nov 2012 17:13 by andyh.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: thoreau, dubs, and Justice for All

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 18:00 #16

  • Guevarista
  • Guevarista's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1365
  • Thank you received: 247
  • Karma: 14
I have a friend called Merv Bronstein who's just joined the DIF, he might sign up and ask them about Saturn and the Reptiles in the next couple of weeks :D
The mean­ings that are the most directly prac­ti­cal are the ones that are sac­ri­ficed: the fla­vor, aroma and touch are abol­ished to the profit of the delu­sions that per­ma­nently lead sight and hear­ing astray.
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 19:03 #17

  • dantesrevival
  • dantesrevival's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 453
  • Thank you received: 300
  • Karma: 15
Hehehe
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 20:37 #18

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
and Justice for All wrote:
M&M (can I call you that Mikeyx2?) ;)

:cool: Provided you don't think of me as the rap artist, the villlainous wrestling stable or the Mars product. :D
thank you St Jude for favours granted
You must register to post here.

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 20:46 #19

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
andyh wrote:
That said the RWA type was certainly more prevalent than the left.


Certainly it was the authoritarian side that had the support of many mods: and that was evident in not only the views expressed but above all in how the place is run:

1) The first rule of DIF is that you do not talk about moderation.
2) The second rule of DIF is that you do ot talk about the fact that moderation is not discussed, that it took place or that it isn't taking place.
3) The third rule is that mods' decisions can only be discussed via PM.
4) The fourth rule is that this well get you ignored, insulted and/or penalised further.
5) The fifth rule is that you may appeal to the admin,
6) See rule 4
7) The forum rules are pretty much ad hoc (see the oioioi two sentence decree)
8) The forum rules do not apply to people in favour with Sean or I_am (e.g. ES/Progress Forward)
9) Fuck you, little people.
10) "Peace and love" smiley face
thank you St Jude for favours granted
Last Edit: 27 Nov 2012 20:47 by mikey mikey.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: thoreau

Re: David Icke Forum Fraud 27 Nov 2012 20:49 #20

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
mikey mikey wrote:
7) The forum rules are pretty much ad hoc (see the oioioi two sentence decree)

lol yeah I remember that classic.
Second line.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.173 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today76
Yesterday452
Week2614
Month7386
Total1061235

Your IP Address: 216.73.216.176 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Saturday, 20 June 2026 07:09

Who Is Online

Guests : 883 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel