Does anyone have a link to where and when Mr. Allen said this?

I mean, I agree with him about MTV, obviously...

wake_up_bomb wrote:
www.facebook.com/tpvwindowsontheworld you need to scroll down a bit but its there

thoreau wrote: Thanks for the link. Obviously a daft thing to say. I must say that his version of Poulton is quite believable, I am inclined to believe it. As I've said previously, I believe that she was mainly motivated by salvaging her own reputation rather than any act of conscience. But this is hardly surprising when you employ mainstream journalists with decades of experience and pay them £300 per month. From my experience, there are very few people of genuine character and conscience out there, and you'd be incredibly unlikely to find them working in the media for a sustained period!

For me, it's extremely disappointing that of all the people you could have employed, the two people fronting the station were both experienced media personalities. This is the total opposite of what should have happened. I have zero desire to be a TV presenter, but I honestly believe I could do better than either of them based on what I've seen. Maybe I wouldn't do the links to camera quite so well, but is that what it's all about, really? If you're interested in that, you might as well get Ant and Dec and Davina McCall to front it. It's about the substance of the presenters' knowledge and the way they challenge their interviewees. I just don't feel it's there for either Poulton or Allen, and there must have been many, many people out there who could have done a better job.

I would have suggested Keelan Balderson for starters. Whether he would want to do it is debatable, but he's a very good radio presenter, much better than me, and I'm sure he would be really good. And he knows ten times more than Allen and Poulton put together, and he's never likely to work for the BBC, in fact when the BBC tried to get him on 'Conspiracy Road Trip' he gave them short thrift. It's not at all surprising to me that the one person who has been very well received is not the professional media operator, it's the guy who's been involved in activism for over a decade who actually knows what he's talking about.

wake_up_bomb wrote:
Its whether he'd want linking so closely with Icke? and at the end of the day its only an internet channel, with limited scope and very likely to cease in the next couple of months. Had different hands been at the helm it could have all gone very differently

Grenadene wrote: Yeah, I suspect that he probably wouldn't, that's why I said it would be debatable whether he'd want to be involved. You're totally right about the other points as well, to have any remote impact it has to be on TV, otherwise it's a waste of time, really.

I looked at my emails today after not bothering for a bit, and found that I'd also received TPV begging letter. It's over 4 years since I stopped them sending me DI's monthly letters (the standard ones - was never a premie) so what are they doing keeping my bloody email address on file!?!

Gilly wrote:
Yeah me too, hilarious innit.

Seems sodlike Productions is open again, here is a link on TPV ,


sodlikeproductions.motion-forum.net/t236...criptions-at-the-dif

Merv is Sod?

See post 27.... for our next recruit lol.

www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=266203&page=2

Good post. He/she will get hammered for it!

Most likely be deleted soon by a Mod.....

chandrakavi wrote:
See? I said Billy's not the complete tw@ some make him out to be.

Sod..

Or billy. Whoever.

Sod...

Are you shooting a love gun at him?

Gilly wrote:
Is Merv?

chandrakavi wrote:
- don't really care. It's 'the game' they brag of, innit.

batou wrote:
Sod's not Billy.





Is he?



No, he isn't.

*Edit* Not that I'd be shooting a love gun at Billy either, btw.