Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: The People's Voice

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:35 #2121

  • diforumreject
  • diforumreject's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 113
  • Thank you received: 118
  • Karma: 0
SilvaRizla wrote:
Gilly wrote:
You do not have to be a director in a limited company to be a share holder.

In a private Ltd company, to become a shareholder you either have to be a director, or, the director has to sell you a share. In a PLC, you can just buy shares, the director has no say in who buys them. IE: You can't get a share in TPV unless Sean specifically decides to sell you one.

No, you cant get a share unless DI and Sean agree, as they currently are the existing shareholders
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:36 #2122

  • Hrafn
  • Hrafn's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Rank1
  • Posts: 41
  • Thank you received: 64
  • Karma: 0
feather wrote:
Icke didn't really lie Gilly, it's all a matter of what was said when.

Tpvboard Zpsd4b54dd3


Icke was a shareholder, then he wasn't, which will have left Sean as current sole shareholder/director.

Does it say Icke has given up his share and Daisy has two shares now?
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:37 #2123

  • SilvaRizla
  • SilvaRizla's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder
  • Rank4
  • Erm, hiya :)
  • Posts: 1015
  • Thank you received: 867
  • Karma: 0
Hrafn wrote:
SilvaRizla wrote:
diforumreject wrote:
nominal or not, they are the only shares in existence, which means the company is owned 100% by DI and Sean

I believe DI won't have a share no he is no longer director.

So you think he has handed the keys of the Porche over to Sean?...No way..

It makes little difference, Sean can sell him shares whenever or icke can put in bills from one of his other companies to suck money out of TPV.
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:38 #2124

  • Hrafn
  • Hrafn's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Rank1
  • Posts: 41
  • Thank you received: 64
  • Karma: 0
diforumreject wrote:
they are not fake shares, I have ran several companies which I owned by way of "nominal" £1 shares and can assure you all the profits ended up in my back pocket!!!!! If you dont go public, £1 nominal shares work just fine to own a company.

its not owned by Sean, its owned by Sean and David 50/50

DI no longer being a director has nothing to do with the shares, there has been no re-allocation of shares recorded at companies house

Troofstick...
Icke aint gonna give it up to Daisy and Daisy hasnt got two shares..
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:40 #2125

  • feather
  • feather's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • I got 99 problems being Merv ain't one.
  • Posts: 9557
  • Thank you received: 9419
  • Karma: 93
SilvaRizla wrote:
Well, if you know that they were both directors and will both have a nominal share, what are you trying to do?
We've known since the outset it was a Ltd company.

That's my query too silva.
The 10,000 or so contributors at the moment are donators, not shareholders and that has been clear from the word go.
They could never expect a financial return.

If Sean and Icke pulled off a massively successful TV station with plenty leftover to cream off in profit for themselves, well they may be accused of misleading the donators with the not-for-profit angle but they will have done exactly what every private company aspires to.
Last Edit: 19 Jan 2014 11:43 by feather.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SilvaRizla

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:40 #2126

  • dubmeup
  • dubmeup's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3239
  • Thank you received: 2296
  • Karma: 0
The relevance of holder stqtus to me is it shows who gets to keep the assets when the company is closed.
No wonder they wanted all that high end gear rather than a webcam or three eh.
"laws are unenforceable if the majority break them."-humanspirit,
"avoid the concept of an ambassador for truth altogether"-gilly.
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:41 #2127

  • diforumreject
  • diforumreject's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 113
  • Thank you received: 118
  • Karma: 0
SilvaRizla wrote:
diforumreject wrote:
they are not fake shares, I have ran several companies which I owned by way of "nominal" £1 shares and can assure you all the profits ended up in my back pocket!!!!! If you dont go public, £1 nominal shares work just fine to own a company.

its not owned by Sean, its owned by Sean and David 50/50

DI no longer being a director has nothing to do with the shares, there has been no re-allocation of shares recorded at companies house

Well, if you know that they were both directors and will both have a nominal share, what are you trying to do?

We've known since the outset it was a Ltd company.

I was trying to establish the company shareholders/ownership, which I have done, its Sean and DI 50/50. Until I got the report this was not known for sure, now it is. Whether Sean and Di are directors or not is irrelevant, they own the company so can appoint directors as they wish.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: thoreau

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:41 #2128

  • Hrafn
  • Hrafn's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Rank1
  • Posts: 41
  • Thank you received: 64
  • Karma: 0
Gilly wrote:
I'm not a director of my husband's company, or even an employee - I have no link with the company whatsoever, but am a registered share holder, purely so that I can get dividends.

And thats how it works one who has the most has controlling majority..
Ickes got controlling Maj over Sean via his 'Name only' it seems..
Last Edit: 19 Jan 2014 11:41 by Hrafn. Reason: typo
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:41 #2129

  • SilvaRizla
  • SilvaRizla's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder
  • Rank4
  • Erm, hiya :)
  • Posts: 1015
  • Thank you received: 867
  • Karma: 0
Hrafn wrote:
feather wrote:
Icke didn't really lie Gilly, it's all a matter of what was said when.

Tpvboard Zpsd4b54dd3


Icke was a shareholder, then he wasn't, which will have left Sean as current sole shareholder/director.

Does it say Icke has given up his share and Daisy has two shares now?

The transfer of shares need not be declared until the books are submitted end of year.
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:45 #2130

  • SilvaRizla
  • SilvaRizla's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder
  • Rank4
  • Erm, hiya :)
  • Posts: 1015
  • Thank you received: 867
  • Karma: 0
diforumreject wrote:
SilvaRizla wrote:
diforumreject wrote:
they are not fake shares, I have ran several companies which I owned by way of "nominal" £1 shares and can assure you all the profits ended up in my back pocket!!!!! If you dont go public, £1 nominal shares work just fine to own a company.

its not owned by Sean, its owned by Sean and David 50/50

DI no longer being a director has nothing to do with the shares, there has been no re-allocation of shares recorded at companies house


Well, if you know that they were both directors and will both have a nominal share, what are you trying to do?

We've known since the outset it was a Ltd company.

I was trying to establish the company shareholders/ownership, which I have done, its Sean and DI 50/50. Until I got the report this was not known for sure, now it is. Whether Sean and Di are directors or not is irrelevant, they own the company so can appoint directors as they wish.

Reallocation of shares doesn't need to be disclosed until year end. Fact is, we have no idea who owns TPV now. We know Icke and Adl had a share each when it was formed in May, and thats it.

-E2a We also know its a Private Ltd company, meaning you can't just purchase shares and turnup at the nonexistent shareholder's meeting, and we know that we're never going to see a detailed financial breakdown because thy have no legal requirement to file one.
Last Edit: 19 Jan 2014 11:46 by SilvaRizla.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: dubmeup

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:47 #2131

  • Gilly
  • Gilly's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Psychic Assassin
  • Posts: 11225
  • Thank you received: 6506
  • Karma: 99
Shares can be transferred at any time, but it's irrelevent, because there does not have to be any transfer of shares.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:49 #2132

  • SilvaRizla
  • SilvaRizla's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder
  • Rank4
  • Erm, hiya :)
  • Posts: 1015
  • Thank you received: 867
  • Karma: 0
Gilly wrote:
Shares can be transferred at any time, but it's irrelevent, because there does not have to be any transfer of shares.

Nor any disclosure of any transfers until next year.
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:52 #2133

  • Gilly
  • Gilly's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Psychic Assassin
  • Posts: 11225
  • Thank you received: 6506
  • Karma: 99
Just for clarity, you don't have to surrender any shares on giving up directorship - that's what I was getting at.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SilvaRizla

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:52 #2134

  • diforumreject
  • diforumreject's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 113
  • Thank you received: 118
  • Karma: 0
SilvaRizla wrote:
diforumreject wrote:
SilvaRizla wrote:
diforumreject wrote:
they are not fake shares, I have ran several companies which I owned by way of "nominal" £1 shares and can assure you all the profits ended up in my back pocket!!!!! If you dont go public, £1 nominal shares work just fine to own a company.

its not owned by Sean, its owned by Sean and David 50/50

DI no longer being a director has nothing to do with the shares, there has been no re-allocation of shares recorded at companies house


Well, if you know that they were both directors and will both have a nominal share, what are you trying to do?

We've known since the outset it was a Ltd company.

I was trying to establish the company shareholders/ownership, which I have done, its Sean and DI 50/50. Until I got the report this was not known for sure, now it is. Whether Sean and Di are directors or not is irrelevant, they own the company so can appoint directors as they wish.

Reallocation of shares doesn't need to be disclosed until year end. Fact is, we have no idea who owns TPV now. We know Icke and Adl had a share each when it was formed in May, and thats it.

-E2a We also know its a Private Ltd company, meaning you can't just purchase shares and turnup at the nonexistent shareholder's meeting, and we know that we're never going to see a detailed financial breakdown because thy have no legal requirement to file one.

that's true, it is possible the shares have been transferred since then, but we wont know either way, we certainly cannot say that Icke is no longer a shareholder just because he is no longer a director. What is interesting is the way the company was set up with Sean and Di being shareholders but the people who actually supplied the capital having no status whatsoever.

In addition, now that DI has resigned as Director, if the shit hits the fan and the company goes under its all on Sean:-)
Last Edit: 19 Jan 2014 11:54 by diforumreject.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gilly

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:52 #2135

  • dawnbreak
  • dawnbreak's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • R.I.P DG xxx
  • Posts: 3533
  • Thank you received: 1198
  • Karma: 94
Does anyone know how many shares the Ltd co has....is it 2 (most likely)

It is a not for profit Ltd co. so could be limited by guarantee with no shares in existence




[whispers err why has my old avator come up? Do I need to change the picture on both laptaps? The one in livingroom has changed but the one in the bedroom has xma gizmo :conf: ]
Last Edit: 19 Jan 2014 11:55 by dawnbreak.
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:56 #2136

  • Gilly
  • Gilly's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Psychic Assassin
  • Posts: 11225
  • Thank you received: 6506
  • Karma: 99
That's what we're debating, Dawn. You'll have to read the last page or 2.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:56 #2137

  • diforumreject
  • diforumreject's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 113
  • Thank you received: 118
  • Karma: 0
dawnbreak wrote:
Does anyone know how many shares the Ltd co has....is it 2 (most likely)

It is a not for profit Ltd co. so could be limited by guarantee with no shares in existence
private limited by shares company with two shares, 1 for Sean, 1 for DI, see my links in previous post. Tried to insert them as images but didnt work
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: dawnbreak

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:58 #2138

  • SilvaRizla
  • SilvaRizla's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder
  • Rank4
  • Erm, hiya :)
  • Posts: 1015
  • Thank you received: 867
  • Karma: 0
diforumreject wrote:
SilvaRizla wrote:
diforumreject wrote:
SilvaRizla wrote:
diforumreject wrote:
they are not fake shares, I have ran several companies which I owned by way of "nominal" £1 shares and can assure you all the profits ended up in my back pocket!!!!! If you dont go public, £1 nominal shares work just fine to own a company.

its not owned by Sean, its owned by Sean and David 50/50

DI no longer being a director has nothing to do with the shares, there has been no re-allocation of shares recorded at companies house


Well, if you know that they were both directors and will both have a nominal share, what are you trying to do?

We've known since the outset it was a Ltd company.

I was trying to establish the company shareholders/ownership, which I have done, its Sean and DI 50/50. Until I got the report this was not known for sure, now it is. Whether Sean and Di are directors or not is irrelevant, they own the company so can appoint directors as they wish.

Reallocation of shares doesn't need to be disclosed until year end. Fact is, we have no idea who owns TPV now. We know Icke and Adl had a share each when it was formed in May, and thats it.

-E2a We also know its a Private Ltd company, meaning you can't just purchase shares and turnup at the nonexistent shareholder's meeting, and we know that we're never going to see a detailed financial breakdown because thy have no legal requirement to file one.

that's true, it is possible the shares have been transferred since then, but we wont know either way, we certainly cannot say that Icke is no longer a shareholder just because he is no longer a director. What is interesting is the way the company was set up with Sean and Di being shareholders but the people who actually supplied the capital having no status whatsoever.

In addition, now that DI has resigned as Director, if the shit hits the fan and the company goes under its all on Sean:-)

It won't be on Sean, A ltd companies debt dies with the company, they don't get transferred to directors. There is no accountability, just a load of free money and many ways to cream off the top.

To the person who keeps talking about the porsche: Did you not read my post that stated DI owns no shares in any of his companies? DI Books is owned by Linda and Gareth. DI doesn't need shares.
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 11:59 #2139

  • feather
  • feather's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • I got 99 problems being Merv ain't one.
  • Posts: 9557
  • Thank you received: 9419
  • Karma: 93
dawnbreak wrote:
[whispers err why has my old avator come up? Do I need to change the picture on both laptaps? The one in livingroom has changed but the one in the bedroom has xma gizmo :conf: ]

I did not smile at this, oh no I didn't!
Well ok maybe a little :D

Nope you don't need to change both laptops. the other laptop just has your xmas gizmo still cached.
You'll be fine.
You must register to post here.

The People's Voice 19 Jan 2014 12:01 #2140

  • feather
  • feather's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • I got 99 problems being Merv ain't one.
  • Posts: 9557
  • Thank you received: 9419
  • Karma: 93
diforumreject wrote:
dawnbreak wrote:
Does anyone know how many shares the Ltd co has....is it 2 (most likely)

It is a not for profit Ltd co. so could be limited by guarantee with no shares in existence
private limited by shares company with two shares, 1 for Sean, 1 for DI, see my links in previous post. Tried to insert them as images but didnt work
Do I have your permission to convert those to images for you?
You must register to post here.
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.930 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today622
Yesterday1480
Week9676
Month35979
Total1238979

Your IP Address: 216.73.217.15 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Saturday, 17 October 2026 10:25

Who Is Online

Guests : 738 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel