An, erm, questionable link chand lad!

Grenadene wrote:
He's a bloke - married - can't recall if he has kids.

welcome to the new forum members - so many of whom have had me wanting to applaud whilst sneaking a peak at the dif.

Its like groudhog day is the dif. the mods have it down to a fine art.

Shit hits fan cos david or sean or both have been dodgy,

posts and posters removed/banned

people asking why are then warned not to or banned

eventually the forum resembles a chorus of nodding dogs clueless as to what has gone on with a few who do know but cant say through fear of being banned themselves, often not knowing there are alternative places out there to virtually gather because they too are whitewashed from the dif realm

mods out in force attempting to change the subject, rally the troops or make asinine comments about who has the right to ask or say what

it all dies down eventually due to the whitewashing or another drama unfurls

rinse, repeat

Problem - icke's money drives and ventures has more holes than a colander

reaction - genuine questions arise and freedom of speech used to express discontent

solution - ban, delete, threaten with ostracisation - bad mouth those who speak up or accuse all and sundry of attacks.

It is all terribly familiar behaviour from elites, cults, religious extremists and other assorted control freaks.

So yes welcome aboard I hope you find the place refreshingly different. have a look around and get comfy. In a few months time as the dif fills up with fresh blood unaware of what has gone on before a new fuck up by team icke will start the whole process again no doubt.

grenadene on DIF:

" Sonia Poulton would be absolutely crackers to rejoin TPV her credibility would be absolutely shattered! I couldnt believe it when she joined in the first place, she isnt a troofer shes a journalist that isnt afraid of telling the truth - huge difference. The TPV is watched by conspiracy theorists, sure it has some good content but it isn't going to attract or awaken new people because people assume DI is a nutcase - I'm undecided on that but I certainly think he's been king of conspiracy castle for a long time and he's gotten used to it. It's nice that he's got his inner circle of dedicated followers but that isn't going to change the world are get us any closer to the critical mass required to make a difference.

If there are worries about how the finances are being handled then why not be open - this 'not offically required until the end of the year' is total rubbish, people are coughing up because they feel strongly that certain information needs to get out. I happen to agree. The lack of engagement with constructive criticism does this place no favours at all - David Icke doesn't engage with the forums so he's unlikely to get offended. Honestly so much opportunity and yet its just the same old stuffy 'dont dis King Icke - he's been through a lot! well so have a lot of people who have stuck their necks out to bring truth into the public domain.

So no I dont think Sonia should come back and I think David should be a little less pompous towards the people who support and fund his platform, it seems to me he's got a cushy little number going on now and there's no way he can't be making a comfortable living from his activities, fair play, but hush with the constant whining about your sacrifies, it's not as though you're banged up for being an enemy of the state!

And some of you please... wipe the brown off your noses. "

Spot on mate!

Slightly off topic so I apologise, but I'm quoting people when I reply and it doesn't appear to be working properly. Can anyone see the quotes in my posts?

SilvaRizla wrote:

Sometimes, I can see your quote of Thoreau above

@silvarizla I was not angry with myself per sé as my motives for posting on ickes were and remain with the objective to speaking to like minded people in a respectful manner about all kinds of subjects and trying to connect on a virtual level with others who see the current paradigm as being unsustainable. That I stuck around posting once I realised how the place is run and allowed myself to be sucked into arguing with bigots and power mad deleters (they are not moderators, there is fuck all moderate about them they are repeater deleters imho) does make me angry at myself.

Since being a member here I have often voiced opinions where I have been in a minority of one. But I am still here, not banned, not called names and not made to feel unwelcome. I have also found encouragement to get on with real life things, new skills, brushing up on old skils, new adventures and less doom. I may not post as much as i did on dif but I feel so much better for it and know I can pop in here anytime I want and read interesting and informative stuff and not be pressed into forking out monies for overlord oioioi's newest venture

Andyh did you get my. PM mate?

I love Spongecustard's strawman argument to grenadene's post on DIF:

" So you're suggesting that TPV should keep Sonia or anyone else at all costs simply because they have an ounce of mainstream credibility? By those standards, anyone who has ever had a bit part on TV would be suitable. "

Strawman arguments are so common on there. "OH RIGHT, so because you're saying that, you must have this ridiculous position i've just invented for you"

nonfictionalentity wrote:
Yes that was incredibly annoying, sometimes I swear I could feel the blood vessels bursting in my brain

chandrakavi wrote:

Ah soz im using tapatalk on my mobile at the mo and the pm function doesn't work