Welcome all who have arrived here, lovely to see some familiar folkies from that horrible DIF

Moving back from my own previous posts on unrelated subjects back to the original subject matter in the OP and on most of the following pages, I haven't watched TPV for many weeks now. (Well I have tried at times but it's always been blank).

Can anyone who actually has comment if there has been any coverage of these crucial issues please?

Many thanks

Glad you made it over. At this rate, in a few weeks there'll be no-one left on DIF apart from grandmasterp, lurk and bikerdruid.

Bloody hell, they're watching like hawks. The mere crime of posting on this forum means I can't even see the DIF anymore

'Temporarily' Suspended, Abra? There are other threads you should post that on as well as this one (if you haven't already!).

electricdreams wrote:
No, I haven't received a PM from a mod with any warning/points etc., and I'm still logged in to DIF, but I just can't view any sub-forums or threads in my User CP, they're all marked as "Private"/"no subscribed threads to display" now. I'm guessing that when I log out of DIF, I won't be able to log in again....? Is that how it works?

I really didn't anticipate all this when I woke up this morning

They just blocked me out now - most likely for welcoming IWTT.

Panther wrote:
Thank one of these three:

It'd make a great book, the info on that thread. I mean a book about the size of Icke's one about 9-11, with a flowing, fluent prose style, and photographs, moving out from Savile to the royals, the intelligence agencies, organised crime, systematic paedophilia in politics and entertainment, the Vatican, Israel, Freemasonry, the 'care' system, the BBC, the media cover-up etc etc. It would really be a crash course in conspiracy themes for newcomers to the subject, if it was done right. No-one would publish it though, it'd probably have to be done in the form of a blog or something instead.

DI should have written something like that instead of yet another book with the same subjects as his last ones. Oh well, I might have a go at it myself...

Panther - sorry to say I think your card was 'marked' (really, fuck that shit) when you put your avi up here - instant ban.
Abra wrote:
Join the club - the lack of any message, warning, or points just makes it all the more likely you've been temp suspended until you can be banned or made inactive imo (inactive looks better for them). No discussion, no debate, no income tax and no guarantee If you're temp suspended you will likely be able to log in still but you'll get the same end result (you can't do anything).

I just meant you should post the same thing on other threads like 'rumours about the DIF forum' or whatever it's called as well as here - plenty of similar threads - I'm sure your input will be very welcome there just as here

I put my avi up last night and yes I was surprised I could still get on today... until just a few moments ago.

Panther wrote:
Soz - when I said 'instant ban' I meant I thought you would get one as soon as they could get round to it, not that they would do it instantly (they have a long list right now to get through and dwindling volunteers - a bit like TPV eh?). They also seem to 'like' to mix things up a bit - as if that makes things any less obvious (like mark people as 'inactive' rather than 'banned' or 'suspended' etc).

Anyone watched Windows on the World since it went full-time Mon-Fri as the 'headline' show for the 'station'? Anything on child abuse so far?

feather wrote:
Thanks feather, I always wondered what "inactive" meant. Now I know. What a shower of cunts

Like TPV threads the CSA threads on there make for depressing veiwing- suspended, banned, suspended, inactive, suspended...
The Elm thread still locked too. I have a feeling it will stay like that and, once it's slipped from first page view, even be quietly deleted.

Dopey wrote:
I'll pull the hair out of my ears if they delete your thread! Taj is still active. Maybe he can help with getting it backed up with Bossman's (?) assistance. There's a lot of important info on there that can't be lost.

They are getting tricky with the bannings there.

Inactive is the new banned!

If every member that was actually banned said banned under the username it would look worse than what it does saying inactive.

Inactive implies you asked to go inactive, that is what it used to mean.

It's their form of a D notice
InacivateD

On the subject of tpv coverage of child abuse- I saw that Ritchie prog was covering

"Singles and Gay adoption....................."

(Not gonna post the link to diffy - it was a 'whats on now' thread I think)

Now from our findings on JS etc- the new 'model' for child abuse seems to be fast track adoptions- no secure checks- and pity the poor children with no where to turn

Removing the children from care also means that compensation claims can't be brought - it's all about money.

And TPV is brainwash promoting and advocating this - without giving context and warnings????

Something STINKS BIG TIME about their programming content.

Good spot Refugee, thanks for that.

Yeah I absolutely couldn't believe when I heard about single males being allowed to adopt. It was advertised all over BBC local radio here, which says it all really I think

electricdreams wrote:
hmm new thread needed perhaps cos my initial reaction is why not let single men adopt tbh - would be interesting to read others views.

musky wrote:
I'd probably buy it, musky, but you'd have to go some to top David McGowan's excellent Programmed To Kill. I thoroughly recommend it to anyone who is looking for an unflinching look at serial killers, satanic child abusers, paedophiles etc.