Gilly wrote:
I meant when they are fully clothed. Maybe just out of curiosity?

Ab Origine wrote:
*sighs*

Ok if you insist. The following is nothing short of perfection right down to his very voice. There is nothing comes close

He has to be gay to start with... second he has to get along with kids alright... third he has to have a set of morals. Yeah, that about sums up what I am looking for in a man right now

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
First thing I look at, Lesley. But then, I'm no lady.

Sean.

You won't know him but I do... did.

Yeah, Sean.




















*sighs*

cantata wrote:

Ab Origine wrote:
It's not the first thing I look at, but I'll check out the trouser region if I know I can get away with it without them clocking me. Why not though? It's more out of curiosity than anything else.

Mind you, if there's anything obvious going on *down there* you can't help but notice. Then I have to tell myself not to look, but usually that makes it worse and I worry that I'll end up staring at their crotch, and then they might think I'm a perv. This makes it worse because I then feel compelled to have a gander.

I'd be the same with a woman who was displaying lots of flesh though. It's just natural curiosity.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
I always look lesley.....Why not

pheony wrote:
It's not as if men don't do it. Women are just less obvious about it imo.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
I've noticed women looking

And when I look at ladies, I'm very discreet

irrepressible wrote:
Oh dear, I always thought I was using my Ninja stealth. Maybe not though

oioioi wrote:
Not THAT Sean!!! I'm not that big a fekkin eejit.

Here: have a +karma

What do I look for in my ideal man? Well, the pics posted so far of Tom Hardy and Johnny Depp are definitely most pretty! For me, a man has to be really kind with a good sense of humour, and emotionally stable too to balance out my at times rather, er, artistic temperament! Physical attraction is important, of course, but not as important as the foregoing!

@ lesley - I don't think I check out a man's "package" myself - at least, not consciously anyway! For one thing, I'm not very good at "subtle" and the guy would be bound to notice!

Mandy

irrepressible wrote:
I've always found most women to be quite discreet when having a perv, not that I get looked at very often with anything other than disdain...

Men on the other hand, are quite a different kettle of fish. Many is the time I've caught one mid-perv, and these are men that are usually "straight", apparently. Undressing me with their eyes...like I'm some kind of sex object...

cantata wrote:


You mean that one?

Women are discreet Abs, but I still notice

They don't really see much unless there's something "obvious going on" like Lesley said I don't often get "excited" out and about though

andyh wrote:
Ooh, more pretty! Thanks, andy!

(Squee! Somebody has +karma'd me! Thanks, whoever you are!!)

Mandy

Thinking about it...I do sometimes catch myself staring at "top-bollocks", albeit unwittingly. I honestly don't believe there is anything sexual about it on my part, it's just sometimes, they can be quite mesmerising.

irrepressible wrote:
Something 'obvious going on' could also mean tight or ill fitting jeans or trousers. Maybe even cycling shorts.One of my old science teachers wore quite tight slacks, and it looked like he had a packet of Polo's in his pocket

I used to know a man who had holes in the crotch of his jeans and didn't wear any undercrackers. He would sit with his legs akimbo Seeing his hairy plums spilling out wasn't a very pretty sight He obviously knew people could see and I think it gave him a cheap thrill.