dawnbreak wrote:
While she was busy telling us there was no such thing as society Morrisey was busy telling us why we should stare at our navels rather than get angry and react and do something.

oioioi wrote:
Ayn Rand readers have continued this lie online
oioioi wrote:
Didn't come accross that way to me.

AND THE stone ROSES WITH THERE fookin' rainbows

mikey mikey wrote:
Their music just bored me.

Gilly wrote:
I read half of it and got bored. Icke references it in at least 4 of his books but it's just an ebook that could have been written by anybody.
It's not sufficient enough evidence for me... I think it's a bit poor that Icke feels the need to regurgitate the story so often.
I don't rule it out... but it sounds a bit fanciful.

well you could be the leader of the gang ........but expect investigations

jhado wrote:
Each to hiw own: At that time i was listening to The Smiths, The Cure, The Dead Kennedys, Black Flag, The Chieftans and Gustav Mahler.

there are three great songs





bob marley three little birds




and

this one

mikey mikey wrote:
I just detest The Smiths with a vengeance. I was the only punk in school when all the 'alphas' were growing quiffs and constantly gazing towards the floor and not the heavens.

Ironically Morrissey would get that sentiment.

Cunt.

i aint listening to that womans mouth run... nope *plugs ears* can't make me
behead her... make sure her head is buried separately than her body, make sure theres no chance she survives it

Gilly wrote:
Yeah I believe it to be true
trauma based mind control is an area that interests me a lot and what she says is consistent with numerous other reports from both victims and insiders that have spoken out (there isn't much distinction between the two groups as that is the way they are raised in illuminati families)

oioioi wrote:
Hahaha, in Manchester even the "aphas" are alternative.

We had moved for my dad's job and the shithole we were in was Tory controlled ultra conservative shithole. The "alphas" I knew were all would be yuppies leaving me with a deep hatred for Sade, Chris de Burg, Huey Lewis and the News, etc. And then there was the garbage like Mel & Kim, Bros, and anything else by Stock Aitken Waterman.

Before i start..disclaimer... "Not that theres anything wrong with that"
Gilly wrote:
Story: Busted: Hillary Clinton Caught Checking Out Christina Aguilera



newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012...-boobs#ixzz28NWnNfYf

Bit of Lynn action too?





upstart.bizjournals.com/views/columns/th...schild.html?page=all

How many people get to honeymoon at the Whitehouse?

Just to be clear though, Nov - it's not the lesbianism thing I was referring to with disgust, but the raping of genitally mutilated, mind-controlled sex slaves.

I personally feel that there are more than enough genuine reasons to condemn the actions of Hilary Clinton in the fullest.

I would begin with the most recent and work backover: starting with her performance as Secretary of State.

1) She continued and even increased the US aggression: e.g. In March 2009, Clinton prevailed over Vice President Joe Biden on an internal debate to send an additional 21,000 troops to the war in Afghanistan.
2) She freely and proudly admitted to assassination.
3) Her orders to spy on UN diplomats that were leaked by wikileaks. Allies too.

As for her sexual practices; I think the only valid point might be that she is living a sham of a marraige. However, there is no doubt about that and who could blame her?

No, I think her possible homo/bi-sexuality is irrelevant and that photo is more telling about the nature of that website: News Busters which admits it is there to be "making fun of liberals and the media" and have been frequently accused of photoshopping.
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=NewsBusters

NewsBusters is a project of the Media Research Centre which is sponsored by rich corporations like Exxon Mobile and runs a McArthyesque campaign to smear anybody that they don't agree with them or their sponsors.

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Media_Research_Center

So Hilary is an evil bitch, whether or not she likes to sleep with women.

But thanks for drawing my attention to Newsbusters/MRC newly re-launched campaign to provide "balance" (FOX News style).

Gilly wrote:
Sure ok, and forgive my post for not really fitting in with the quote..i will explain more in a minute...

And mikey i agree with you in that i have no issue with her or anyones sexuality....

My comments just perhaps fit in with other persistant information that some of these people arent who they say they are...thats the point...they are elected officials afterall...and they perhaps arent who they say they are.

And this is a hilary thread!

The story was just something i came across by chance on another forum, and if i didnt already know the points you made.... i wouldnt be in this thread posting.

Hilary and pals arent good news for anyone except hilary and pals is what i think, regardless of whether or not shes into christinas assets. Same as you.

I do think there is perhaps some relevance to some people if elected officials arent who they say they are, whether it be about their sexuality or anything else...the facts are that we will never know these things for sure anyway imo...we can see their policies though and the effects of those cant we.

Yes, I think those are good points myself, Novum.

I actually Like Margeret Thatcher ....The Iron Lady





Sorry back to the show

dawnbreak wrote:
those 2 dudes dancing

novum wrote:
I would agree that politicians are better off being open about their sexuality. However, i am against "outing" UNLESS the politician is performing an act of the deepest hypocrisy by taking an anti-homosexual stance, OR is taking a strongly pro-homosexuality stance and not declaring a personal interest. In that case, the homosexuality issue becomes an honesty issue.

Otherwise the issue is irrelevant and serves only to distract from issues that actually affect people and onto personality politics.

Furthermore, it reinforces the notion that homosexuality is something to hide/be exposed.

I know that wasn't your point Novum, but it is certainly one the bugbears of News Busters and its readership
www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs...752&biw=1311&bih=618

Warning: quite a lot of wingnut queer-bashing on those links.