Yes Dawn, what you're saying makes sense. But some things that are highly detrimental to the authorities still do get published. Such as books claiming Queenie's a child-eating lizard, for eg. and the royal family were responsible for the murder of Diana. So it's not a foregone conclusion that just because someone lived to tell the tale, it can't be true. They had O'Brien's daughter - maybe they thought that was sufficient to make her keep her mouth shut. Who knows?

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
yeah probs cause she is female and talented

Witches don't believe in Satan. David might be a Satanic reptilian witch though.

so do you believe the queen is giant child eating lizard

dawnbreak wrote:
Who, me? Course not. Some people do though, don't they. There are also detrimental things published that are irrefutably true - like the book on statistics of fatalities in hospitals cause solely through negligence and malpractice that Ian Crane use to parp on about for example.

i'd really love someone to explain this





this is one that has always stuck with me

the good thing is most of us are not pulled into this crap..

cath o'brien was sexually abused

however watch this you tube vid




she mentions hitler and catholics ,,,,,,and Mk mind control but and no point does she mention hillary clinton sitting on her face

That clip's less than 10 minutes long though, Dawn. It's not going to cover all the harrowing details that were packed into that book.

Re that clip on the sisters, I remember there being a really long thread on t'other site about it years ago. Didn't some male relative of them post something on it eventually? Very strange goings on.

ok i'll try a find cathy o'brien narrative that is longoer than ten mins

I'm not saying she was not sexually abused however I think her book is a pile of poo ...sorry...

It is too corfromed and regimental and part of plan

Well don't look for clips on my account - I've read it. As to its authenticity, I'm not sure either way. I'm interested to learn what you mean about it being part of the plan, Dawny. Have to log off for a bit though as my PC's behaving strangely and it's taking an eternity to create a brief post like this one. I'll be shot-putting it at the wall if it keeps it up!

dawnbreak wrote:
Forget that its makow for a minute..,he pulls this stuff from the book...its quite

www.henrymakow.com/000683.html

As i said...i can never know if its true though tbh.

I've never read Cath O'brien's book. Mainly because the subject matter is so grim.

Hilary Clinton is pretty dubious on account of her political leanings alone.