Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: 'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment

'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment 15 Aug 2013 14:02 #1

  • wake_up_bomb
  • wake_up_bomb's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 5063
  • Thank you received: 4418
  • Karma: 56
news.yahoo.com/old-white-racist-famed-at...pawns-121046650.html
Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins is no stranger to controversy. For years, the famed atheist has regularly gone after the faithful, sometimes uttering offensive statements about their beliefs and practices. On Thursday, the activist and scientist took to Twitter, taking particular aim at the Muslim faith.

"All the world's Muslims have fewer Nobel Prizes than Trinity College, Cambridge. They did great things in the Middle Ages, though," he wrote.
Trinity College, Cambridge, has more smug, bourgeois, self-satisfied wankers than the whole of the Middle East, but you don't hear me complaining about it.
This message instantaneously sparked fierce debate, as it essentially noted that a college has garnered more Nobel Prizes than the estimated 1.6 billion Islamic adherents across the globe (as the Guardian notes, a cursory Wikipedia search shows 32 Nobel laureates for Trinity and 10 among Muslims). Though it was re-tweeted (shared) more than 1,000 times, critics quickly responded to the quip.

From issuing messages dubbing him a "an old white racist" to claiming the atheist leader is unfairly targeting the Muslim faith, many excoriated Dawkins.

"Is that a thing we can do as white people? Take trophies we invented then use others lack of them as proof of superiority?," asked one clearly discontented Twitter user.

Christopher Hitchens:

www.stopwar.org.uk/index.php/afghanistan...-the-poison-of-islam
But in Hitchens’ account the reverse is true. ‘Religion poisons everything’ – i.e. religion is the determinate force in creating the barbarisms we encounter in contemporary Afghanistan. The very superficiality of Hitchens’ religious critique allows it to perform a specific ideological function; religion occurs as a generic, unadulterated corruption which renders invisible the historical events which have set the stage for its worst excesses.

If one does view the world from such a perspective - then we can quite easily see why it is morally incumbent on ‘us’ (the west, or at least western governments) to take action and impose the secular state model particularly on those countries whose religious excesses must be thwarted in order to ‘protect’ their populations.

The same countries, of course, are often those which have been attacked, colonized and disrupted by imperial power in the first place, but such historical content perishes before the static dichotomy of a rational and enlightened western secularism over and against a morose religious, and most often, Islamic medievalism.
There are many more examples of Hitchens, he was always crapping on about it while he was alive.

Martin Amis:



www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-488239/...-states-evolved.html
In an interview with Jon Snow on Channel Four News, Amis declared: 'I feel morally superior to Islamists, by some distance. I feel an intellectual distance to Islam.

'There are great problems with Islam. The Koran recommends the beating of women.

'The anti-Semites, the psychotic misogynists and the homophobes are the Islamists.'

Days earlier, Amis shocked festivalgoers in Cheltenham with claims that Muslim states are less 'civilised' than Western society.

'Some societies are just more evolved than others,' he said. 'I am not saying these people are genetically incapable of not being terrorists.

'These societies are arming themselves with weapons like the AK47 and blowing people up on buses and Tubes.'

When one member of his audience suggested not all Muslims were terrorists he retorted: 'No one else is doing it.

'Here in the West we have the most evolved society in the world and we are not blowing people up.

'I am just saying some societies are more evolved than others. Young men in those kinds of societies are growing up full of loathing and hatred. Something has to be done about it.'

Ian McEwan:

old.richarddawkins.net/articles/2756
The novelist Ian McEwan has launched an astonishingly strong attack on Islamism, saying that he "despises" it and accusing it of "wanting to create a society that I detest". His words, in an interview with an Italian newspaper, could, in today's febrile legalistic climate, lay him open to being investigated for a "hate crime".

In an interview with Guido Santevecchi, a London correspondent for Corriere della Sera, the Booker-winning novelist said he rarely grants interviews on controversial issues "because I have to be careful to protect my privacy". But he said that he was glad to leap to the defence of his old friend Martin Amis when the latter's attacks on Muslims brought down charges of racism on his head. He made an exception of the Islamic issue out of friendship to Amis, and because he shares the latter's strong opinions.

"A dear friend had been called a racist," he said. "As soon as a writer expresses an opinion against Islamism, immediately someone on the left leaps to his feet and claims that because the majority of Muslims are dark-skinned, he who criticises it is racist.

"This is logically absurd and morally unacceptable. Martin is not a racist. And I myself despise Islamism, because it wants to create a society that I detest, based on religious belief, on a text, on lack of freedom for women, intolerance towards homosexuality and so on — we know it well."

See also:

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2174813/Ian-McE...-militant-Islam.html

I'm sure there are many others, these are just examples of which I'm aware, I try to avoid the tittle-tattle media as much as possible. It just shows how easily people can have the wool pulled over their eyes, be made to think a certain proscribed way, and see the world in a way which is useful to the established power structure.
The true measure of a man is not his intelligence or how high he rises in this freak establishment. The true measure of a man is this: how quickly he can respond to the needs of others and how much of himself he can give - Philip K. Dick.
Last Edit: 15 Aug 2013 14:02 by wake_up_bomb.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: andyh, dubmeup

'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment 15 Aug 2013 14:14 #2

  • Reptired
  • Reptired's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Senior Boarder
  • Rank3
  • Posts: 591
  • Thank you received: 268
  • Karma: 0
Dawkins makes me sick.

"While the so-called “New Atheists” are spending their energies warning of the violence that is justified by religious belief, they miss the most dangerous, the most irrational, and the most pervasive religion on the planet: statism. Modern-day government is a god and statism is a religion that is responsible for 260,000,000 deaths last century alone."

www.corbettreport.com/episode-276-the-state-is-not-great/





Actually Dawkins has one piece of work that I enjoy.

You must register to post here.

'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment 15 Aug 2013 14:39 #3

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
Most of what is said about islam is quite correct, so I'm afraid you won't find me bothering to defend it or its adherents anymore than christianity.
I don't just guess that, I KNOW that as I used to live in the middle east. Anyone who doubts its a bad idea needs to pay a visit to riyadh on a friday, be sure to bring a barf bag.
They still execute people for witchcraft and sorcery in chop-chop square.

Its also true that money and statism as reptired days are global religious beliefs as evidenced by shake on this forum.

All forms of dogma no matter what they are, are basically holding humanity back. While Dawkins is correct in much of what he says, its worth pointing out that he makes money out of it.

We do NOT have any 'moral imperative' to bring 'freedom and democracy (lol)' to these people, all we have to do, is stop trading with them and leave them. It would be far more effective than anything short of nuking them basically. Just a year or two of no trade and no tourism would make or break them, simple as.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.

'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment 15 Aug 2013 15:10 #4

  • wake_up_bomb
  • wake_up_bomb's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 5063
  • Thank you received: 4418
  • Karma: 56
I don't disagree with what your'e saying about Islam, Andy, but I think it's wrong to assume that all Muslims are extremists, which I feel is the implication here. There are lots of moderate Muslims who wouldn't do anything to hurt anyone. Of course, I still disagree with some of their beliefs, but I disagree with most people's beliefs.

I also just think it is particularly hypocritical of these people to be so critical of the 'Muslim world', but yet we hear absolutely no critique of the British establishment from them. I've heard none of them - with the possible exception of Ian McEwan - saying anything about drone bombing, or something like workfare even. Christopher Hitchens managed to give lengthy critiques of the 'War on Terror' without ever mentioning that the United States has a 'defence' budget in excess of $1 trillion, instead pontificating that it is some sort of moral crusade.

My view is that although I disagree with many of the things that go on in Islamic nations, it is up to the people of those nations to rise up, end those practices, and change their society if they wish to do so. I also strongly believe that the assertion which is often made that Islam wants to take over the world is misleading. Yes, there is some suggestion that 'non-believers' should be converted, but I believe that if these countries were left alone to their own devices, which they should be, we would never hear anything from them at all.
The true measure of a man is not his intelligence or how high he rises in this freak establishment. The true measure of a man is this: how quickly he can respond to the needs of others and how much of himself he can give - Philip K. Dick.
You must register to post here.

'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment 15 Aug 2013 16:18 #5

  • Reptired
  • Reptired's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Senior Boarder
  • Rank3
  • Posts: 591
  • Thank you received: 268
  • Karma: 0
wake_up_bomb wrote:
I don't disagree with what your'e saying about Islam, Andy, but I think it's wrong to assume that all Muslims are extremists, which I feel is the implication here. There are lots of moderate Muslims who wouldn't do anything to hurt anyone.

I'm quite wary of any Collectivist Ideology that people subscribe to, when push comes to shove these people must either lose their belief system or they become capable of committing any act the Hierarchy requests of them.
You must register to post here.

'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment 15 Aug 2013 16:53 #6

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
wake_up_bomb wrote:
I don't disagree with what your'e saying about Islam, Andy, but I think it's wrong to assume that all Muslims are extremists, which I feel is the implication here. There are lots of moderate Muslims who wouldn't do anything to hurt anyone. Of course, I still disagree with some of their beliefs, but I disagree with most people's beliefs.

I also just think it is particularly hypocritical of these people to be so critical of the 'Muslim world', but yet we hear absolutely no critique of the British establishment from them. I've heard none of them - with the possible exception of Ian McEwan - saying anything about drone bombing, or something like workfare even. Christopher Hitchens managed to give lengthy critiques of the 'War on Terror' without ever mentioning that the United States has a 'defence' budget in excess of $1 trillion, instead pontificating that it is some sort of moral crusade.

My view is that although I disagree with many of the things that go on in Islamic nations, it is up to the people of those nations to rise up, end those practices, and change their society if they wish to do so. I also strongly believe that the assertion which is often made that Islam wants to take over the world is misleading. Yes, there is some suggestion that 'non-believers' should be converted, but I believe that if these countries were left alone to their own devices, which they should be, we would never hear anything from them at all.

Not all, but certainly most.
You'll find most muslims are quite happy with sharia law etc, its certainly surprising to us that so many would find it acceptable but what we have to bear in mind is whats normal for those people and what they were like not long ago before we arrived to get the oil out.
They will happily abuse women and children and most support it, you have to come to grips with it tbh.
Christianity was basically identical around the middle ages..roughly matching the islamic calendar :)

Our real enemy here as anyone with intelligence can see is the oil industry. They dominate huge aspects of everyones lives, without the oil industry there would be no concern, indeed not only would there be less concern about terrorism but less about pollution or chemicals or big agri corp and on and on it goes.

The ONLY way this problem will ever get resolved is to simply abandon them but we won't because the real interests in all this and therefore the real terrorists are at the top of our corporate, governing and banking systems. They are filthy stinking rich because of the situation we are in today, its really really obvious and nothings going to change so long as the current status quo remains.

The profit motive dictates the way things are and theres no incentive as yet for alternate energy because theres no profit to be had from it.
The alternate energy and tech IS there, sat there...literally terawatts of power anytime we choose to implement it.

I would like to see more criticism by these people like Dawkins of the western mindset but when all said and done as I mentioned before, he's profiting from what he does and its harder to sell criticism of our own mindset than it is to sell criticism of islam. I need only point at DIF or the daily mail to make that much self evident ;)

I have always tried to make sure I equally gripe about all religion (including statism and the monetary system) as these really are all about a dogma, a belief set, it only exists in peoples minds, it actually has no relevance to the real universe, the laws of physics and nature etc.
Its about time we realised we're long past superstition now, we have real factual evidence about things now that in the past would have seemed like magic and lay people would resort to religion to explain it. Certainly westerners should all be capable of rational thought now but the fear of those in conservative establishment remains, it almost seems like a panic now IMHO.
If people start to realise that there is a way to live their lives productively without having to compete with each other then their way of elite luxury is at risk, they are set for a tumble, no longer will they be revered and held on a pedestal above all others, they'll just become common people like everyone else...thats probably the one thing that scares the crap out of them IMHO. Its like a fall from grace.

Anyone who talks about such a way of life where there is little or no pollution, any job anyone wants , any training anyone wants, open publication of all information, travel wherever you like, no borders, no wars is frowned upon as apostasy and apostasy btw is a head chopping offence in riyadh.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.

'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment 15 Aug 2013 19:14 #7

  • wake_up_bomb
  • wake_up_bomb's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 5063
  • Thank you received: 4418
  • Karma: 56
andyh wrote:
You'll find most muslims are quite happy with sharia law etc, its certainly surprising to us that so many would find it acceptable but what we have to bear in mind is whats normal for those people and what they were like not long ago before we arrived to get the oil out.
Sorry, I haven't got time for a long response at the moment. I accept the above and I am aware that it is the case. I just believe that if it's going to change, then the people that tolerate and even support it have to change it. Much like I now accept that if people want to wave a little flag in the street at the inbred Bavrians, you just have to let them get on with it. If the British people ever want to change the nature of their society, it will change, if Muslim people ever want to change their society, it will change. Until then, they both deserve what they get.

For me, all of the people in the OP should be critiquing the nature of their own society, not pretending that it's perfect and morally superior and stating that it needs to be imposed on other people, lest Islam takes over the whole world. I'm glad that we don't chop people's hands off and stone people to death, but these are pretty meagre achievements. We certainly do lots of other things that are morally reprehensible, where are any of these people's criticism of these actions? I just view Islam as absolutely no threat to anyone other than those who choose to follow it - and it is a choice, as far as I'm concerned, no matter how strong the coercion is in those societies - whereas I view the trillionaires that drive foreign policy and have access to nuclear weapons, and have used them, as rather more dangerous.
The true measure of a man is not his intelligence or how high he rises in this freak establishment. The true measure of a man is this: how quickly he can respond to the needs of others and how much of himself he can give - Philip K. Dick.
You must register to post here.

'Intellectuals' and anti-Muslim sentiment 15 Aug 2013 19:22 #8

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
wake_up_bomb wrote:
andyh wrote:
You'll find most muslims are quite happy with sharia law etc, its certainly surprising to us that so many would find it acceptable but what we have to bear in mind is whats normal for those people and what they were like not long ago before we arrived to get the oil out.
Sorry, I haven't got time for a long response at the moment. I accept the above and I am aware that it is the case. I just believe that if it's going to change, then the people that tolerate and even support it have to change it. Much like I now accept that if people want to wave a little flag in the street at the inbred Bavrians, you just have to let them get on with it. If the British people ever want to change the nature of their society, it will change, if Muslim people ever want to change their society, it will change. Until then, they both deserve what they get.

For me, all of the people in the OP should be critiquing the nature of their own society, not pretending that it's perfect and morally superior and stating that it needs to be imposed on other people, lest Islam takes over the whole world. I'm glad that we don't chop people's hands off and stone people to death, but these are pretty meagre achievements. We certainly do lots of other things that are morally reprehensible, where are any of these people's criticism of these actions? I just view Islam as absolutely no threat to anyone other than those who choose to follow it - and it is a choice, as far as I'm concerned, no matter how strong the coercion is in those societies - whereas I view the trillionaires that drive foreign policy and have access to nuclear weapons, and have used them, as rather more dangerous.

The irony of it all IMHO is that those who want real positive change are peaceful, nice people and as such are not interested in even so much as political lobbying let alone violence to get their way.

This can be seen in Egypt for example where a minority (the hardcore sharia crowd) are the ones who fight the hardest to get what they want. This 'might is right' attitude has always been prevalent no matter what the religion or culture in the area, the bastards always get what they want at the expense of everyone else. People talk about the good ones snapping and revolting etc but tbh I see little evidence of it.

If we want anything at the end of the day we'll have to fight for it, I don't see any choice in the matter and things will have to get seriously fucked up if decent people are going to turn that way.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: novum
  • Page:
  • 1
Moderators: oioioi, psketti, batou
Time to create page: 0.176 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today1057
Yesterday4382
Week9953
Month34888
Total1133312

Your IP Address: 216.73.217.23 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Wednesday, 26 August 2026 17:09

Who Is Online

Guests : 907 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel