Do you remember your user name on DIF yet?

The situation is very clear: you're a fanboy of this nitwit, and are pissed off that I've exposed him as a fraud. It's ok, we've all been had at some point. I don't think any less of you for it.

I know you're mad at me and will never 'forgive' me for exposing him as a fraud. That's your choice, mate. You do you.

mikey mikey wrote:
Why the fuck does it matter to you? Honestly. Who gives a shit?

And what the fuck does it have to do with the thread topic?

Mickey wrote:
You asked me a question and demanded a straight and honest answer.

I gave you one.

Will you not now do the same?

Notice that I asked for an answer on the THREAD TOPIC. That's all that's relevant. Why does it matter what my previous username was?

You clearly believe it will help your argument and hinder mine? It is a 'character flaw' if I don't look for my posts from 2 years ago?

Seriously: why does this matter?
mikey mikey wrote:

Mickey wrote:
Well I am clearly not a fanboy of this man at all. My post history shows nothing of the sort. It does show a strong admiration for Chomsky, CS Lewis and renaissance sacred music, however. And that's just it: people here know me and know that I have never expressed such admiration for Brand. As I said: I just agree with him lately.

As for being mad/upset: actually its Brand's opponents that seem to have lost their composure. Mostly by rants about the elite and the illuminati or the guys choice of partner. This is indicated strongest by the use of repetition and the use of CAPS.

You're assumption about my state of emotions ironically seems a desperate bid to "prove" that you are correct about Brand all along.

Mickey wrote:
Why keep it secret and say you "forgot"?

It doesn't seem hard to type a username in.

Why not, after all?

I answered your question without hesitation.

dawnbreak wrote:
Tizwas......that name rings a bell.

You answered a question that was relevant to your own thread topic. Do you want to start a new thread: what was mickey's username on DIF? Feel free to do so.

Obviously, it makes you feel better that I don't want to bother. I'm obviously 'dishonest' for not providing it.

This, of course, means that russell brand IS a true vanguard revolutionary of the people.

Your logic is impeccable! Well played, mate! You PWNED ME!!!!
mikey mikey wrote:

That might explain the staunch Icke defence. Thanks hugorune

lets see if mickey wishes to answer a simple question honestly

back OT

www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment...osh-wer-8939040.html

MIKEY MIKEY's emergency protocol when losing an argument on the internet:

Step 1: deflect attention from argument you originally lost.

Step 2: ask a question about an irrelevant topic.

2a: he answers: sling mud about previous username.
2b. he doesn't answer: call him duplicitous and deceptive.

Step 3: use name calling/ad hominem attack (see 2a or 2b for specifics).

Step 4: use ad hominem to claim that one's previously undermined argument is now VALID!

Step 5: recruit another forum member to support you by hook or by crook.

Step 6: CLAIM VICTORY!

Step 7: start thread to ban forum member you lost said argument to.

Wash, rinse, repeat.
mikey mikey wrote:

I never started a thread to have somebody. Nope. In fact I voted no to knobmeup's one.

Do you remember your DIF username yet?

It's nice to see you accept that Russell Brand is a sell-out fraud.

Keep askin' mate, the gig's up and I already exposed your "plan B re: post 591."
mikey mikey wrote:

Mickey wrote:
Quote it or it didn't happen

Do you refuse to answer my question?

So you think he is on the up and up accepting millions from the illuminati media?
mikey mikey wrote:

Mickey, you've twice stated you'd like to get back on topic and twice failed to do so. So let's try again eh.
What are your thoughts on what Brand had to say about corporatism, politics/voting, inequality etc?
(That isn't me asking what you think of Brand btw )

knobmeup wrote:
I agree with most everything he says. I don't vote myself, never have, and probably never will.

But like I said, there's a gulf between what one says and what one does. If those two are in alignment, you are a hypocrite.

For example, if David Icke claims to be a supporter of free speech, then allows forum admin/moderators to ban members for exercising this right without becoming abusive, simply posting honest messages, he's a fucking hypocrite.

Likewise, if Brand claims to be 'for the people' and opposed to big business and govt corruption, then he is certainly opposed to the media's attempts at mind control. And yet, he works for media mind control, as evidenced by mtv and by his work in numerous films, most notoriously Despicable Me, which is replete with illuminati symbolism.

He's a fraud, mate. His actions speak loud and clear.

Mickey wrote:
Quote it or it didn't happen.

Third time and you get the troll song.

Should be a lovely tune. I'll pen the lyrics:

I love russell brand's hair.
Those lovely locks.
If you say otherwise,
you are full of bollocks
russell brand who?
I can hardly think.
He's so hawt
Makes me feel like a schoolgirl,
wink wink. facepalm
mikey mikey wrote:

Mickey wrote:
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha