Did I say he was an animator? LOL.
Brand is not an idiot. He knows what the symbolism in that film means. Don't comment on it until you actually see it. It does nothing but promote illuminati symbolism. Brand is not ignorant of this. But he took the cash anyway.

Way to deflect attention, and act as if you don't understand the real issue. You know he accepts millions from illuminati mind control media. Don't play games. It only makes you look silly and even more like the fanboy you claim not to be.

I've seen some of the ghibil films as well. Too bad that such imaginative work falls under the disney umbrella.
mikey mikey wrote:

Mickey wrote:
Not upset. I posted the because your continuous attempts to saddle me with opinions that I don't have. If your intention was to upset me, I am sorry, but you haven't.

OTOH, since I think that most people (not all) trying to sell Ron Paul are wingnuts and closet Republicans mis-using the term Lbertarian on behalf of corporate interests, then yeah, if I get associated with them, it irritates.

Especially when on this very thread I made it clear what I thought of him.

So we return to the actual thread topic.

I can assure you that any prick who accepts million dollar payouts repeatedly from illuminati mind control media is by definition a sell-out.

Russell Brand is a sell-out. His words are meaningless unless they are backed by action consistent with his statements. Since he acts in the interests of the illuminati, his words in opposition are meaningless. Agreed?

I hold Icke to the very same standard: if he speaks out against the illuminati, he MUST act in accordance with his beliefs. Too often, he does not.

You can get mad and act offended. Fucking irrelevant, mate.

The issue here is whether Brand actually believes his own bullshit. Look at his track record. He clearly doesn't.
mikey mikey wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Now resorting to memes. Trolling, or just childish?

Mickey wrote:
If only that were true. In fact all you have returned to is the same assertions as before: Brand's a prick, illuminati, controlled opposition etc
Mickey wrote:
I am neither. It was not what was being said about Brand that led me to post the emoticon. As I said before: it is because you clearly do not read other people's posts properly. I have demonstrated with quotes this twice now. You also assume I have opinions that I do not express. That gets tired and old really quick. It also makes you look thick.

Oh and be assured that I am not your mate and care nothing for your friendship. considering your comprehension skills, it would be a liability.

Anyway, back on topic. How can you NOT get that Brand is a sell-out prick? That's all he's been doing for the last 13 years! Who the fuck do you think he works for? Who signs his checks? Follow the money.

Brand is a sell-out. PERIOD. His actions speak for themselves. FUCK his interview.

Mickey wrote:
You called me thick in your previous post. Am I not allowed the same?

Not being able to take ones own medicine is a good example of "childish".

So you dismiss these assertions, then. It's not important to you that multinational media mind control signs his checks. If this isn't important to you, you are quite obviously in denial. That's what fanboys do: they deny the evidence and live in a little fanboy dreamworld.

Someone needs to wake up.
mikey mikey wrote:

mikey mikey wrote:
and two posts later...
Mickey wrote:
Could it be true this time?
Mickey wrote:
Nope. Once again: In fact all you have returned to is the same assertions as before: Brand's a prick, illuminati, controlled opposition etc

No one gives a shit about memes. Let's try to discuss the topic. Perhaps you don't feel it is profitable, eh?

You dismiss the evidence that Brand is financially subservient to mainstream mind control media. That tells us everything we need to know right there.
mikey mikey wrote:

I called you thick because you ARE.

I called you a fanboy because you ARE.

You are delusional. You live in a world of denial.

Brand is pwned by mainstream mind control media. If that's how you use the term. I don't know, I'm not 12.
mikey mikey wrote:

Simple question: do you think Russell Brand is sincere in the interview?

YES or NO ONLY.

Mickey wrote:
Is that what fanboys do? Too bad I am not a fan of Brand. I just agree with most of what he said in the interview and wrote in his articles.

I do not really relate to fandom but I do have some people that I wold call great influences on my life: George Orwell, CS. Lewis, Noam Chomsky, MAK Halliday, Thomas Tallis, Gabriel Faure, W H Auden, JRR Tolkien, Emmanuel Kant, Philip K Dick etcetera

And I have seven awake since half past seven this morning.

As for dismissing the assertions: the accusations of hypocrisy have been addressed and in my opinion rebutted several times over by posters here and by Brand himself in the article that you assured me you had read. No counter-rebuttal has been brought forward so there is little left to say until one is.

As for the illuminati accusation: that is for you to prove. Perhaps you might like to dedicate a thread to it.

Mickey wrote:
Yes.

Now my turn.

What was your name on DIF?

Simple answer please.

I'll have to check as I was banned two years ago, mate.
mikey mikey wrote:

And now that we have that: you are full of it.

Russell Brand talks the talk, but he doesn't walk the walk. It's as simple as that. He stuffs his pockets with illuminati money (probably to support his habit), whoring himself out for money and fame, and then claims he wants social change.

Are you really that stupid? He's a full on hypocrite through and through. Wake up.

Oliver North didn't recall.

Mickey wrote:
At least I have what it takes to answer honestly.

mikey mikey wrote:
He called himself a 'patriot.' And some people believed him too!