Excellent advice feather, may I apologise for allowing myself to be dragged into an arguement that is beneath this forum. No that is not a dig at IAAIA, as I am just as much to blame for letting this happen. Thread has been edited and locked.

These are the ones, enjoy squabbling

Thankyou

Any reason why it's a Sticky?

No idea.

Tiz a dirty shitty thread. Ofc it's sticky

I didn't sticky it, I wanted to end it.....

jhado wrote:
G'day Jhado.

Thank you for doing that.

It was a good idea not to reinstate them all and simply have the embedded quotes, after all, no reason for multiple copies.

I AM ALL I AM wrote:
Only a deluded, self-important twonk would think there was a good reason for one copy.

(Do please start a lot more, 'G'day Gilly' posts, for me to also not read, Twonk).

I AM ALL I AM wrote:
Why don't you just fuck off, you nauseating cunt

Just want to express my appreciation for Jhado as a member, poster and mod.

You're much appreciated here, mate. Almost universal AFAIK. Don't let this lad passive-aggressive you into stress.

IAIAIA, you might have had a genuine grievance about your "censorship" but I think the time has come to put this behind you.

Gilly wrote: Gilly wrote:
G'day Gilly.

Thank you for clearly showing to one and all that you are not one to live by your word.

As I stated ...

If you intend to live by your word, then to " have no intention of engaging you any further", means you will no longer engage me ever. Any further means from this point. No intention eh. Ever.

So if you do engage me, does this show everyone that you do not live by your word?

Kinda boxed yourself in there, huh.

You now are unable to respond "paragraph by paragraph" as you claimed you could, though as of yet it is an unsubstantiated claim, that if you now attempt to fulfill shows your word to be broken. You are now unable to respond to me for any reason without braking your word. I suppose it only matters if keeping your word has any meaning to you ... and we all get to find out through the simple experience of your own self expression.

... which means to trust you, I would trust you to not live by your word until such time as you show me otherwise.

" I think it has to do with perception management via the language that we have been indoctrinated with. If people do not comprehend what the words that they use are creating, they are powerless to fully utilise the creative ability in a beneficial manner.

Think of it this way, if I labeled you, then ultimately I am labeling myself. Even if it is a true representation of how the other has portrayed themselves, the vibration of the label (think sound, cymatics), though obviously not of their soul, the vibration of the label is sounded off within my physicality. As has been shown with Masuri Emoto's work with water, the crystalline structure of the physicality (in this instance water, of which the body is predominantly made up of) is broken down, whereas 'positive' words create beautiful crystalline structures. As with cymatics, the physicality forms itself to the vibrational frequency it resonates at.

Any time someone labels me in a negative manner, then it is themselves that will act out what they have expressed BECAUSE (be-cause, being the cause) that is how the process of creation, Life, functions. You can deny stepping off the cliff,,yet this does not stop the fall from occurring."

The above is shared for the purposes of truth and is something that I stated in a PM discussion that was sparked off by this whole scenario. So thank for being a part of the process that brought about such a discussion.

jhado wrote: I AM ALL I AM wrote:
G'day Jhado.

Either it wasn't a genuine sentiment, or your Christmas cheer has not lasted.

Considering what has transpired, I trust you to be the way you are portraying yourself until you show me otherwise. Therefore it would appear to me that such a sentiment was not genuine to begin with.

I AM ALL I AM wrote:
I refer you to post #30

You must really love me IA if you continue writing reams to me even after I've told you I don't read beyond the salutation.

Write more, why don't you! And try 'n' make 'em less brief. You know you want to.

Gilly wrote:
G'day Gilly.

Of course I love Who You Are, and I encourage you to express the truth of Who You Are.

You appear to besuffering from a misguided notion though. My posts are not for you or anyone else, though all may choose to read or not as they so desire. My words, well ...

MY WORDS

MY WORDS ARE EXPRESSED,
WITH REASON AND RHYME,
A LOVE THAT'S CONFESSED,
THROUGH RHYTHM AND TIME.

MY WORDS ARE A GIFT,
A TRUTH THAT IS ME,
WITH A MESSAGE TO UPLIFT,
FOR ALL ETERNALLY.

MY WORDS ARE ALWAYS CLEAR,
WHETHER YOU LISTEN OR NOT,
THEY SHOW MY MIND HERE,
THE ONE THAT LOVE BEGOT.

MY WORDS I CONFIDE,
ARE ALL WRITTEN FOR ME,
FOR THE JOY I FOUND INSIDE,
HAS SET MY LOVE FREE.

jhado wrote:
Hey Jhado - I'm going to risk making the assumption that Twonk's posts above are full of the same smug, goading, logic-twisting bull-shit that he's displayed elsewhere. That being the case, I'd recommend that like myself, you don't even read them, then to echo Mikey's advice, you won't get 'stressed'. That will thwart his plan of driving people slowly bonkers or, death by smug, goading, logic-twisting bull-shit syndrome.

Let me elaborate.

Speaking generally, a certain type will start something off by being an arse to someone.

You keep your tongue for a while, hoping things will just die down. But no, it won't, as these things escalate.

So, when you feel obliged to speak your mind on the subject - maybe because you want to defend someone - that's it! This 'type' will try to lock you into an argument that goes on to infinity and beyond.

Yes, it's sorely tempting to let yourself get sucked in, by answering every ridiculous comment made by the type, but ...must...resist. Every twonk on the internet gets a small stiffy when they know they've hooked you into that scenario, as they eat at your precious time and drain your energy.

And no amount of reasoning will ever make them see their hypocrisy - so fuck that for a game of conkers, eh!

In fact, they'll often assume the attitude of a teacher, who has the moral high ground.

They'll have you believe, for example, that any unkind words you say result in a fairy dying.

But just try pointing out that the monstrous thing was triggered by their own unkind words, and, Satan's cock, you're trying to manipulate with emotional blackmail, and you want them to feel bad because you're mean. Besides which, their unkindness was actually correct anyway, and most probably caused an angel to get its wings, because they're so fucking special.

So don't read, and you can't get riled up by the arrogance.

Love,

The Anti-Twonk
x