In fact, should they have 'investigated' the original evidence regarding the car, do you think, or just not bothered their arses once DVLA proved to be a waste of time?

You's think you's are good at playing with words , yes I will give you's that .

The point that was made by me tonight was , it depends on who's talking for others to deem it to be the truth .

marina posted that post and 4 people thanked her for it

andyh , feather , gilly and oioioi

when I posted it , I was attacked by gilly saying it was a wild claim etc..

but it was a mistake that she thanked marina for it in a hurried ciggie break

This is allegedly the truth community , well from what I have seen , I would like to take this opportunity to say that some folk should really take a look in the mirror as you are only lying to yourselves

Why is this only coming out now so many years later? Is it because Bill Roache went on the Piers Morgan show and bragged about sleeping with over 1000 women? I bet he regrets that now. Unless he kept a spreadsheet or a very detailed diary I don't know how he can possibly remember who was who as he is in his 80's after all................

scaltura wrote:
Listen, shit head, I did catch up on that & other threads in as long as it takes to have a smoke - who the fuck do you think you are deciding that's a lie. I generally go back & hurriedly post thank yous - the mobile is a pain in the arse anyway, and moves around while you're pressing stuff. I aborted a post I'd made on my lunch break, because after it taking ages to tap out on the little keys, as I pressed submit, the screen text moved so that I pressed cancel instead, and didn't have time to re-type it.

You were not 'attacked' at all, you soft sod! Attacked indeed! Grow the fuck up!

And don't be calling others stupid when you've not mastered your native tongue yet. Stick to one syllable words.

Babs wrote:
Tom Jones must be shitting himself . when you think how many women threw their knickers at him

Big people may thank others for a variety of reasons.
Taking the time to make a considered post,
Correcting an error,
Adding information
Making a funnee
Or they may simply be in agreement with the entirety of the post.

No-one else can be responsible for how you read that thank you.

Words. Yup they do tend to play a big part in this communication medium and we all make mistakes at times/often.
Most times we laugh it off or just correct it and move on.

If you're a fan of truth then check this out.
I can't recall anyone else here that is so nippy, aggressive or insecure that they leap immediately to "fucking idiot." other than as an obvious joke.
You're not 'abrasive' you're pig fucking ignorant. You don't demonstrate how tough you are, you highlight how fragile you are.
It's not needed. stop it. You look like a dick.

If anyone feels I deserve a timeout for stating this then I'll take it no problem, whining or squealing I'm a 'victim.'

oioioi wrote:

Gilly wrote:
For a fact I'm dyslexic , and I try as hard as I can to type or use my native tongue so you can throw as much of that pish at me all you like , I'm thick skinned , I don't need to type or talk to earn my wages , so it doesn't matter to me

but you are a nasty little hypocrite , and your all raged up that I have the gaul to question your mighty authority and call you out your so easy , keep all the pish that you want to throw at me coming it's amusing , whats that word ? nassarsistic ? hmmm


p.s.

no edits here

What are you bringing up edits for, you soft sod?

Why can't you answer the questions about the thread topic instead of telling lies about being dyslexic to cover for being an illiterate oaf who likes to start fights, then runs off crying about being torn to shreds?

Tell you what, stick to the topic here, and just post your childish piffle in the vent room or by PM. You know plenty of people have pointed out they don't like your attitude - there's no need to frig up every thread you go on, eh!

Just when I thought we'd raised the bar on debate here it's allowed to topple again.

Weak.

Gilly wrote:
Ok , I'm not dyslexic , you know best don't ya

hypocrite

Swerve much?

Am I in danger of dragging you back on topic and you having to either stick with your 'leave the man (Bill R.) alone' stance and accept you're basically saying the plod shouldn't investigate subsequent allegations or you are gonna have to contradict yourself?

scaltura wrote:

@ scaltura

I went on to elaborate my "wild claims" in another post on that same thread. While I agree it's a bit of a double standard when a man and a woman says the same thing, you on the other hand used my words in a triangulation game solely to cause conflict and disrupt the flow of the conversation on both threads. That's very low imho.

scaltura wrote:
Whether or not you are dyslexic, Scalt, really isn't the issue here, and I'll credit you with enough common sense to be fully aware of that.

You've even started on me in a couple of posts last night, when all I was doing was responding to a question you had asked me. Everyone here read your response, and it was completely unwarranted.

I like you a great deal as a person, but I suspect a certain someone may have been whispering shit in your ears about the forum and its members. Knowing what I know of you, I cannot come up with any more reasonable an assumption as to why you are behaving in the manner in which you are. I just don't get it...we were all really pleased to see you finally join up here.

Regardless, what you are doing is being abusive and trolling, and I think it might be time that the members collectively took a decision about your presence here, as we have had cause to do in the past with others. It is not a task we undertake lightly but you're not really leaving us many options here, mate. Look at what you've done to yet another thread...and what for?

Please...stop it.

oioioi wrote:
Well oi , I think maybe you should call the police and ask them why they have allegedly said what they said

Maybe there is nothing in the allegations ?

contradict is a great word innit

scaltura wrote:
I'm asking you if you stand by what you said earlier in the thread.

Swerve much?

Ab Origine wrote:
hey abs

i asked you a question , as i wanted you to answer , that is all

so i'm to be censored ?

Which I answered. But you then decided my answer was too lengthy...you typed it. Go back and read it.

See what I'm saying?

scaltura wrote:
We try to self-moderate here. Some aren't up to the responsibility and may need some facilitating.