Yeah look i can appreciate that, we are all coming from a different place in the time line now....some got to have their say and some havent yet.

To be frank i think a vote on whether to close the rumors thread or not, would result in a vote for closure. However i understand that this would mostly be because the members that have been here a while, have been through the process. So a vote in favour of closing the thread isnt necessarily a fair thing either perhaps despite being democratic, especially to new members. I can see that.

I assume then you would like that thread re opened and have some things to say?

The issue from our POV is that on one hand we are getting asked to lock it , and on the other hand people want it open.

At least we are talking about the decision openly though. We may have to review the decision to lock that rumors thread.

Its probably no surprise my views on the numerous posts related to the DIF. When I first landed here I was a bit surprised by the amount of discussion going on about it. So much so, that in the early days I thought about moving out of here. Its my opinion that so much discussion about it in a negative manner, experiences over there and such, held this site back form developing its own positve impact on the net.
I would rather let all the dif stuff away, and leave it behind us. But if folks want to stay with the dif flow, far be it from me to tell them what and what not to discuss, there was enough of that over the other side, so whatever floats your boat.
Just my couple of dinaries worth.

griswald

Maybe one thread where that can be all said and done?

Boots wrote:
We have a thread started by phemohilia in General, called 'The David Icke Forum'

However now we also have the rumors thread. Perhaps a merge is in order, along with a few extra stray threads i am aware of, and the thread reopened?

Thoughts people?

Boots wrote:
We have a thread started by phemohilia in General, called 'The David Icke Forum'

However now we also have the rumors thread. Perhaps a merge is in order, along with a few extra stray threads i am aware of, and the thread reopened?

Thoughts people?

novum wrote:
I say reopen the rumours thread & merge.

I say reopen the rumours thread & merge.

I'm a little bit sick of the DIF threads..so think.one thread containing all DIF topics should really be enough.

I think that new members should be able to have their say about the DIF .....As we, the first members had that chance...so should they.

pheony wrote:
Perhaps a bit too messy a thread would come out of merging them all. A D.I. sub-forum? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaay down the page.

Perhaps a bit too messy a thread would come out of merging them all. A D.I. sub-forum? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaay down the page.

please just let it die a natrual death

We have a researchers category to discuss their work...not sure if the forum fits into that though.

But a David Icke category on its own... i dont agree tbh. One one hand you guys are talking about being a bit tired of all the DIF stuff, and then we are going to go give it its own category?

I think the mega thread idea is fine, people can have their say, and its all there. Its in General. I agree with pheony and others on this.

Besides i have merged some of the threads now, myself and diamondgeezer made the call.

my 2c.

We have a researchers category to discuss their work...not sure if the forum fits into that though.

But a David Icke category on its own... i dont agree tbh. One one hand you guys are talking about being a bit tired of all the DIF stuff, and then we are going to go give it its own category?

I think the mega thread idea is fine, people can have their say, and its all there. Its in General. I agree with pheony and others on this.

Besides i have merged some of the threads now, myself and diamondgeezer made the call.

my 2c.