I'm curious, how many are fed up of DIF at the moment?

...andy...you just started yet another DIF related thread...

YES!

There's no question about it. I'm so fed up with all DeeFuckenIForum shit, it's amazing how my head has not exploded yet. I think enough is enough, it's time to end all that shit in way or another.

diamondgeezer wrote:
Quite the dilemma

I cant answer a straight yes or no - I am annoyed with the lies and the tit for tat - which I myself have been part of - but I am also aware that other people who have not yet had the chance to vent like I did, should be able to do so here and be heard. I do not want this place to be dif dominated but it is a huge factor in why this place exists and why people are here.

I am fine with people talking about their experiences and how they perceive the situation - would prefer there be one big thread though - somewhere people can read about others experiences and add their own to it.

thoreau wrote:
Well we could just reopen the thread that was closed today and let it run... ?

I have a glimmer of an idea about the big thread but will formulate it properly - a bit slow today its been one of those

psketti wrote:
Depends if the community is pissed off with DIF threads or not, keep on voting ppl

I am not sure that we should be telling people what they can and cannot talk about just because it 'pisses' people off - Football pisses me off but I wouldnt say no footie threads here.

those of us around for the last few months have all had the chance to vent - turning round and saying well i have had enough now so you cant do it - is just not cricket imho.

thoreau wrote:
sanctumzone.co.uk/info/terms-and-policy-...ity-guide-lines.html

2. Please respect other people’s views and beliefs and consider the impact your contribution/​s may have when making your contribution. We understand that peo­ple often feel strongly about issues debated on the site, but we will consider removing any content that others might find extremely offensive or threatening. We reserve the right to redirect or curtail conversations which descend into flame-​wars based on ingrained partisanship or generalisations. We don’t want to stop peo­ple discussing topics they are enthusiastic about, but we do ask that users find a way of sharing their views that does not feel divisive, threatening or toxic to others.

Its right there

I do not agree at all - that is referring to topics that are threatening, offensive, divisive or such like - not about discussions which people could freely and without moderation have for weeks and weeks.

I'd like to answer 'Yes' and also 'No'. Is that OK?

On the one hand, I was sick of the carry-on that went down in the past. I got over it, and that was that.

But now that I see Sean's still up to his monkey-shine, and my name's been dragged through the dirt by him again - and with brand new accusations to boot. So now, I do get the urge to slag the little maggot off afresh, and present evidence of his lying. And I can sympathise with others who are newly aggrieved at being victims of his deceit.

Let them get it off their chests I say. Show some compassion. Nobody wants Sean & I Am on their chest - just nobody!

thoreau wrote:
They became so recently

There will be people who will want to come over here an join up after being banned and other's with stories to tell, so maybe one section set aside for that, however if it's one thread, and it'll turn into a big one, lol, that could contain it instead of it spilling into other parts of the forum and polluting the whole forum.

I'm just thinking here, what if it's sean aim to get this place taken off the net like he did with illusions? I wouldn't put it past him considering his track record.

Boots wrote:
I'd like to think he's itching to.

Didn't he achieve that over a copyright issue though - through their posting his 'free' newsletter (the one that he urges people to spread the content of far and wide ).

Help! I've caught Diamond's rolling-eye syndrome.

Gilly wrote:
This is why I'm sick of it tbh, I don't want to give sean any more ammo.
So, carry on voting ppl, this is what we're about

Boots wrote:
Hi there mate, well it wouldnt suprise me given their reaction to this place.

Personally i would prefer this DIF stuff was done and dusted, though i understand that new arrivals have things to say, i can see the difference as i type this...those that have been here a while and perhaps got it out of there system, well they are tired of it, whereas newcomers want to discuss things in detail.

Gilly wrote:
Yeah have the information free but at a small price.

Oh shit! I'm catching the bug too!

I see he'll try the naming of this forum with the words David Icke as an avenue for legal action then he might try the slander route claiming that this forum is slandering the DIF.

So would it be better to put DIF threads in one section away from public view?

Boots wrote:
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind whatsoever on that score.

It'll be a major fail though, just like him

Boots wrote:
It'll just get infiltrated by someone who's on DIF and then pasted on DIF for all to see.
Again

We're in the process of making sure there are no private sections etc as its too much hassle.