If Sod gets the Yes vote and dose come back, i'l post a right blast from the past vid, in honour of his return!

entran­ger­mer­cen­ary wrote:

Nice one Entran­ger­mer­cen­ary!

also make that two pints he's due you!

you'll have to drink one on my behalf!

I doubt he'll ever be a "good boy" and no one's asking him to, really. He is entitled to his ways and opinions. Just not trolling individuals here is all that's being asked of him, I guess.

Meanwhile... I'll give an ill-fitting "Yes".

(Just don't anyone ask me to vote Tis-was in again, K?).

irrepressible wrote:
Seriously? you can't be serious?

What the hell is the admin of this forum doing banning people anyway? The practise is juvenile and hypocritical given the sentiments behind this forum. Even if you do believe in careful, moderate moderation (I don't. It's censorship and it's wrong no matter what your reasons), banning people is way over the top. If he bothers you, just clarify that his posts are not the sentiments of the admin, hell even make it his forced signature, if possible Create an (open to all) Rant-room and put his threads there but most of all, please realise that often times the poster behind Sod is only JOKING! It's a joke, folks! He is a joke. Why so serious?

dookieadz.deviantart.com/art/The-Joker-176784542

(How do you insert images?)

Fairyelfdog wrote:
It would take only a moment to demonstrate that total free speech is a bad idea.
Its not your name on the domain registration by the way....lol!

cantata wrote:
Nice one Cantata

if Sod starts any shit i'l send the bhoys round




oh and one of these to flush him out with!................

cantata wrote:
Nice one Cantata

if Sod starts any shit i'l send the bhoys round





oh and one of these to flush him out with!................

Runlikehell wrote:
"Does I look serious?"

andyh wrote:
Ah. Ownership. I don't think thats a good arguments since all claims to ownership are automatically false. You cannot own anything. Ever. There is only the right thing to do and the wrong thing to do. Censoring people is wrong. Call a simpleton, please. It makes me feel all giggly inside

look tbh i heard Pesky walked in & caught Sod using the mods shower!

Smiley reconstrustion:






she still wont come out from under that chair!


personally i would have have just stood there like that

Fairyelfdog wrote:
When the cops drag DG out of his bed and off to guantanamo at 3 in the morning you'll feel like a simpleton then alright :p

andyh wrote:
DG?

Fairyelfdog wrote:
Hmmm, I have to disagree with you there Fairyelfdog. If someone came onto the forum and was extremely abusive and harrassed members, they shouldn't be banned?
What if someone was constantly racially abusing a member? Or stalking one of our female members saying horrible sexual things to her?

irrepressible wrote:
Yep. There are a whole range of reasons to ban someone - many of them actual criminal offences, online and off in most countries.

And here, Fairyelfdog, the bannings happen not because diamondgeezer or the mod team say so, but on a majority decision from us all.

cantata wrote:
Yeah, and bannings are explained and discussed with us all.

For clarity.
Actually, most people are here because of the lack of moderation on racist fucknuts elsewhere.
Which killed that forum for them.

It was having the audacity to challenge that which in turn got them banned.

SZ is what happens next, good people get tired of it and go elsewhere.

Could someone who remembers the specifics remind me and others what he was actually banned for?

If it is for the reasons I think it was then I would not be in favour of giving yet another chance.

Fairyelfdog wrote:
DG= Diamondgeezer.

The law has changed regarding whats put on the net, thats not to say you can't get away with a lot but it only takes 1 brown-noser for a lot of pain.
I'm OK with fair speech but free speech includes hate speech.

irrepressible wrote:
Firstly all members bothered by this hypothetical troll has the option of putting him on ignore. Secondly, you can make a subforum where you put all abusive crap so that it doesn't litter up good threads, then people still have the choice to view it if they feel so inclined but they also have the clear choice not to read it, contrary to if it just appears in a thread you read. Can you block someone from PM-ing you? One should be able to, I think. People need to be able to handle life as it is without a parent-figure stepping in and sorting things out when they get too difficult. Generally speaking if we never learn that we will never be independent and sovereign and then basicly we're screwed. We need to do in microcosm: our forum what we want for the macrocosm: the world.