diamondgeezer wrote:
O Rly?

He was labelled something else and it wasn't that...try DIF spy and backstabber.
He's now a DIF mod.

Why would clean slate infer that you can post whatever you like for however long you like? Jesus lol...

I think the clean slat policy should go, as admirable as it seems, because it's unrealistic. That's just my opinion.

andyh wrote:
No, he was called a nazi maggot, by hugorune, and a nan apologist by someone else, JUST FOR BEING HERE...nothing else andy.

So, no 'clean slate policy' for him right?

psketti wrote:
No, it's nothing about me, or what i'd like to do, it's just my way of saying I have more respect for 2 bombers willing to live and die for something than the people in this thread arguing over nothing.

andyh wrote:
.... precisely why I aint been there yet

oh & mike/guev...in response to your question re zeph..

yes he was & still is a member here AFAIK. hollow 2 or something like that...

diamondgeezer wrote: As you know, I completely disagreed with the concept of a 'clean slate'. There is one person who uses this forum occasionally who has been spectacularly rude, yet he is basically tolerated. I honestly cannot agree that the moderation has been heavy handed. Even Sod was allowed back! This is a level of tolerance that you would never have got from me!

I'm not that bothered about the knuckle-dragging, Nazi halfwits, but as they were one of the primary reasons that people became pissed off with the DIF, it's rather difficult for me to think that a 'clean slate' with those people is possible. Not that it would be in any way conceivable that the likes of Bendoon and HJ might ever come round to some sort of reasonable perspective.

As for Cathar, again I ignored him, but he quite evidently had an axe to grind. I disagreed with Oi naming that thread as he did and said so, as did thoreau. He's yet to come back at me and condemn me for this, but I'll let you know when he does.

I had absolutely no problem with you when you were here, as you know, I wish you hadn't left, I don't entirely understand why you did, and I appreciate you setting the forum up in the first place. I would question your motivation for participating in these threads when you said you weren't going to post here any more (which you are, of course, entitled to do so if you wish).

I'm afraid I've got work to do now, and can't respond any further, but if you think anything I've said is inaccurate, please indicate what.

diamondgeezer wrote: Please, call me Mike.
Have you considered the reason this forum isn't what you wanted it to be is not because of any individuals, the moderators or members but the subject matter?

I was about as likely to give that back'-stabbing twat a clean slate as TZ is likely to give me.

Mike wrote:
I can't respect anyone who blows up innocent people who are just out having some fun, testing their fitness, raising some money for charity etc. That bombing was pure misanthropic pointlessness. I don't know what they thought they were achieving, but whatever it was they were wrong. It's like whatever justifications the IRA had, that went right out the window when they started targeting the general population.
IMO anyone who starts kllling random members of the public is basically a serial killer, no matter what their stated convictions.

dogsmilk wrote: For a start I don't like the assumption that all members of the public are automatically "innocent people".
What if all the young men thought they would achieve is the attack?
And what if the completed attack made them feel for once in their lives they had achieved something noteworthy and fulfilling, what right do we have as people who are fairly unfulfilled, who never do anything noteworthy, to criticise them?

Ent, when you address me you should say, "Dear Mike, this is what I think...." always Dear Mike, or esteemed comrade or something ok?

You're the fraud here, you only kill people cause there's money in it for you these people do what they do out of love, passion for life, courage in their convictions, they don't need money to do what they believe in, you strike me as one of these willing dupes who believes in nothing and falls for everything.

psketti wrote:
So less of the clean slate thing to avoid this.

Do sketti and oi have access to inno and freeparking yes/no ?