Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Member feedback is appreciated! Don't be shy and drop us a note. We want to hear from you and strive to make our site better and more user friendly for our members.

TOPIC: SZ Spring Clean

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 22:30 #101

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
feather wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
So what about the idea I proposed about having a new members sub forum, where they can be monitored and brought through?
Is it possible for SZ to create a subforum where new members can come to without them being able to post on the rest of SZ until approved?
Surely this could solve a lot of issues in one go, so what about it?
It could also be where other posters are restricted to when on a warning, and perhaps have limited pms etc?
Is such a level of posting restriction possible?
I think a moderated subforum for new members is the only answer.

I assume the existing members would also have access to this sub-forum / noobs nursery / ghetto, so I fail to see it's purpose.
To insulate the general membership? Do you propose the general members be locked out of that forum unless they are in orange overalls and on gruel rations at the time?

Imo anyone who is at the stage of needing their pm's restricted is passed the stage of needing their arse tossed on the kerb.

I propose that the 'arrivals thread' is joined by a 'new members general thread' In a newcomers sub forum.
Both of which can be accessed by new and existing members, new members will not have any other access to the rest of SZ until they have been seen as genuine for a period, this can be based on their posts towards existing members and other newcomers...

Once they have satisfied the general population then they could be included to the rest of SZ via being nominated by a member to the facilitators, perhaps we could say three nominations would be enough ?

Hardly going to stop them being a twat afterwards is it?

Well no but it's going to stop people that turn up to be disruptive, from accessing the main forum, I guess some would get through, but it's a measure to weed quite a lot out, tbh it's not working how it is if their turning up so often.

I assume a month in the arrivals sub forum if one existed, would provide existing members with an option to delete them, without keeping to have polls debates etc etc etc

Ummm no it wouldn't weed any out at all lol...
I'm not surprised feather has been critical tbh :D

I think it would, because that bored individual who wants to troll and criticise posts would have limited access until they've been approved, it means that they'd have to spend a lot of time behaving before they'd be able to misbehave thus, they would have wasted their time behaving, they would have spent perhaps a month behaving to then simply get banned, where presently they could turn up be chatty nice for a day or two and then start misbehaving.

But as I say it's only an idea, I think it would work, but obviously its not a popular idea.
or I'm not popular enough to have a popular idea...
didums

Alright then, enough pussyfooting with ya.

The community have had a vote (which YOU took part in) and we reached a majority on it.
Now it will get implemented.

Right now is not the time to be starting going on about some other ideas about what to do, the time to do that was back when the vote was implemented.

To continually get involved with these particular type threads with stuff thats not related to what we are doing at the time is actually known as trolling. And the sort of trolls we have biggest issue with eg merv or mike are only too patient enough to put up with a temporary sub-forum spell because they keep coming back again and again and again and again and the likes of myself and feather have been here for a hell of a long time, a LOT longer than yourself, which is why we are pissed off with your attitude and constant bullshit.
I'm beginning to wonder why we bothered voting you back in, you certainly don't appreciate it.

If you want some separate new ideas implementing then start a new vote on it in a new thread and fuck off trying to divert this one.

That will be all, kkggwpkthxetc.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: feather, dubmeup

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 22:35 #102

  • dubmeup
  • dubmeup's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 3239
  • Thank you received: 2296
  • Karma: 0
Bt.

Not only are you proposing a guilty until proven innocent policy but you then propose to incarcerate them with those that are spitting bullets and looking to vent spleen...

So do me a favour and shove it up yer silly arse :facepalm:

and while yer at it...shove yer silly poor me i aint popular enough to have a good idea bollox. :facepalm:

Are you fucking trollsocking or what?
"laws are unenforceable if the majority break them."-humanspirit,
"avoid the concept of an ambassador for truth altogether"-gilly.
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 22:39 #103

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
oioioi wrote:
You mean like a sort of "Inner Sanctum"?

:couch:



:shlap:
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 22:39 #104

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
andyh wrote:

That will be all, kkggwpkthxetc.


:pmsl:
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 22:45 #105

  • jhado
  • jhado's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Facilitator of the Hippy, Weird, and Loving Stuff, the rest is up to them
  • Rankmod
  • Posts: 5020
  • Thank you received: 2209
  • Karma: 70
Verlander wrote:
We seem to spend more time discussing each other than any other topic!

Is this really what SZ was set up for? :roll: The DIF mods must be literally ROTFL reading all this stuff................. :rofl:[/quote


Post of the year for me
Forget yesterday. It has already forgotten you.
Last Edit: 04 Mar 2014 22:46 by jhado.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: angelchemuel

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 22:48 #106

  • Blue_Tackler
  • Blue_Tackler's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Long live the Queen!!!
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1453
  • Thank you received: 920
  • Karma: 0
I'm just suggesting another system, the votes on this poll thing have been cast, their still as you point out yourself not 33% 66% or whatever in relation to the problems.

So the way I see it, we do that thing that Einstein says is madness, ''doing the same thing over & over and expecting different results'' or we do nothing or we change it....

I'm not trolling I'm actually proposing a possible solution to a lot of the trolling that occurs.

This thread is called 'spring clean' right, and I'm discussing ways of cleaning out trolls, so I'm on topic, just I'm looking beyond the polls a little bit, don't we need something else, do we want to be polling the pros can cons of banning barnfish/wolfy poll after poll, I can only see two solutions.
1) let them all in
2) change what were doing as they're getting in and its not working.

I'm making this post in good faith, an idea I had about the new comers sub forum, was just a suggestion, IDK if it would work for sure, at least it's not simply repeating what's going to be happening, the same polls everytime.

@andyh yes ive had my vote and accept the decision, I'm not trying to press through change, it's only an idea, ok it's been dismissed, that's fair enough.
btw we need to bare in mind a lot of the polls only have 20 votes or less, including the facilitators.

It seems that the rest of the members dgaf?

Sorry for speaking out, but at least I bothered.
This is where my bottom line would be if it existed.
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 22:52 #107

  • Blue_Tackler
  • Blue_Tackler's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Long live the Queen!!!
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1453
  • Thank you received: 920
  • Karma: 0
dubs wrote
Not only are you proposing a guilty until proven innocent policy but you then propose to incarcerate them with those that are spitting bullets and looking to vent spleen

Not really, I'm not accusing anyone of anything, it's a probationary period like what happens at some work places etc.... they just wanna make sure your ok ,and wanna be able to fuck bad workers off no bother if they aint, no good, without demonstration.

So im not accusing anyone of guilt just a verification process.
This is where my bottom line would be if it existed.
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 22:56 #108

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
Yes there's not that many SZ regulars despite the DIF influx, nor are there that many new incoming genuine members.
Most of them are either mike or merv, its as simple as that, we know thats the case because we've been here a long time and thats all thats basically happened. The votes have been done and the decision has already been made.
0 post members will be removed shortly and automatic signups have been disabled, now they go through the admins for checking before being made active.
Just those 2 actions alone should make all the difference needed, if the egits pop up again despite the changes then the mods will just re-ban where necessary.
Thats it, thats what was decided on and thats what will happen, any further posts in this thread are basically now pointless.
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Space Bandit

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:01 #109

  • Blue_Tackler
  • Blue_Tackler's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Long live the Queen!!!
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1453
  • Thank you received: 920
  • Karma: 0
andyh wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
feather wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
So what about the idea I proposed about having a new members sub forum, where they can be monitored and brought through?
Is it possible for SZ to create a subforum where new members can come to without them being able to post on the rest of SZ until approved?
Surely this could solve a lot of issues in one go, so what about it?
It could also be where other posters are restricted to when on a warning, and perhaps have limited pms etc?
Is such a level of posting restriction possible?
I think a moderated subforum for new members is the only answer.

I assume the existing members would also have access to this sub-forum / noobs nursery / ghetto, so I fail to see it's purpose.
To insulate the general membership? Do you propose the general members be locked out of that forum unless they are in orange overalls and on gruel rations at the time?

Imo anyone who is at the stage of needing their pm's restricted is passed the stage of needing their arse tossed on the kerb.

I propose that the 'arrivals thread' is joined by a 'new members general thread' In a newcomers sub forum.
Both of which can be accessed by new and existing members, new members will not have any other access to the rest of SZ until they have been seen as genuine for a period, this can be based on their posts towards existing members and other newcomers...

Once they have satisfied the general population then they could be included to the rest of SZ via being nominated by a member to the facilitators, perhaps we could say three nominations would be enough ?

Hardly going to stop them being a twat afterwards is it?

Well no but it's going to stop people that turn up to be disruptive, from accessing the main forum, I guess some would get through, but it's a measure to weed quite a lot out, tbh it's not working how it is if their turning up so often.

I assume a month in the arrivals sub forum if one existed, would provide existing members with an option to delete them, without keeping to have polls debates etc etc etc

Ummm no it wouldn't weed any out at all lol...
I'm not surprised feather has been critical tbh :D

I think it would, because that bored individual who wants to troll and criticise posts would have limited access until they've been approved, it means that they'd have to spend a lot of time behaving before they'd be able to misbehave thus, they would have wasted their time behaving, they would have spent perhaps a month behaving to then simply get banned, where presently they could turn up be chatty nice for a day or two and then start misbehaving.

But as I say it's only an idea, I think it would work, but obviously its not a popular idea.
or I'm not popular enough to have a popular idea...
didums

Alright then, enough pussyfooting with ya.

The community have had a vote (which YOU took part in) and we reached a majority on it.
Now it will get implemented.

Right now is not the time to be starting going on about some other ideas about what to do, the time to do that was back when the vote was implemented.

To continually get involved with these particular type threads with stuff thats not related to what we are doing at the time is actually known as trolling. And the sort of trolls we have biggest issue with eg merv or mike are only too patient enough to put up with a temporary sub-forum spell because they keep coming back again and again and again and again and the likes of myself and feather have been here for a hell of a long time, a LOT longer than yourself, which is why we are pissed off with your attitude and constant bullshit.
I'm beginning to wonder why we bothered voting you back in, you certainly don't appreciate it.

If you want some separate new ideas implementing then start a new vote on it in a new thread and fuck off trying to divert this one.

That will be all, kkggwpkthxetc.

Why don't you start a poll to get me banned then?
This is where my bottom line would be if it existed.
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:07 #110

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
Blue_Tackler wrote:

Why don't you start a poll to get me banned then?


:hmm:


*removes tackler from thread by both lugs*
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:08 #111

  • Blue_Tackler
  • Blue_Tackler's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Long live the Queen!!!
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1453
  • Thank you received: 920
  • Karma: 0
andyh wrote:
Yes there's not that many SZ regulars despite the DIF influx, nor are there that many new incoming genuine members.
Most of them are either mike or merv, its as simple as that, we know thats the case because we've been here a long time and thats all thats basically happened. The votes have been done and the decision has already been made.
0 post members will be removed shortly and automatic signups have been disabled, now they go through the admins for checking before being made active.
Just those 2 actions alone should make all the difference needed, if the egits pop up again despite the changes then the mods will just re-ban where necessary.
Thats it, thats what was decided on and thats what will happen, any further posts in this thread are basically now pointless.

perhaps if you were not such an arrogant cunt more genuine posters may have hung about?
This is where my bottom line would be if it existed.
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:14 #112

  • feather
  • feather's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • I got 99 problems being Merv ain't one.
  • Posts: 9557
  • Thank you received: 9419
  • Karma: 93
Blue_Tackler wrote:
perhaps if you were not such an arrogant cunt more genuine posters may have hung about?

Meme Well That Escalated Quickly
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: andyh, Space Bandit

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:17 #113

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Yes there's not that many SZ regulars despite the DIF influx, nor are there that many new incoming genuine members.
Most of them are either mike or merv, its as simple as that, we know thats the case because we've been here a long time and thats all thats basically happened. The votes have been done and the decision has already been made.
0 post members will be removed shortly and automatic signups have been disabled, now they go through the admins for checking before being made active.
Just those 2 actions alone should make all the difference needed, if the egits pop up again despite the changes then the mods will just re-ban where necessary.
Thats it, thats what was decided on and thats what will happen, any further posts in this thread are basically now pointless.

perhaps if you were not such an arrogant cunt more genuine posters may have hung about?

You just keep carrying on and on and the more controversial the thread the better, especially the sock ones :p

Is flounce one-niner ready for take off? :D
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:25 #114

  • jhado
  • jhado's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Facilitator of the Hippy, Weird, and Loving Stuff, the rest is up to them
  • Rankmod
  • Posts: 5020
  • Thank you received: 2209
  • Karma: 70
Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Yes there's not that many SZ regulars despite the DIF influx, nor are there that many new incoming genuine members.
Most of them are either mike or merv, its as simple as that, we know thats the case because we've been here a long time and thats all thats basically happened. The votes have been done and the decision has already been made.
0 post members will be removed shortly and automatic signups have been disabled, now they go through the admins for checking before being made active.
Just those 2 actions alone should make all the difference needed, if the egits pop up again despite the changes then the mods will just re-ban where necessary.
Thats it, thats what was decided on and thats what will happen, any further posts in this thread are basically now pointless.

perhaps if you were not such an arrogant cunt more genuine posters may have hung about?

By Jove
Forget yesterday. It has already forgotten you.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: angelchemuel

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:31 #115

  • Blue_Tackler
  • Blue_Tackler's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Long live the Queen!!!
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1453
  • Thank you received: 920
  • Karma: 0
andyh wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Yes there's not that many SZ regulars despite the DIF influx, nor are there that many new incoming genuine members.
Most of them are either mike or merv, its as simple as that, we know thats the case because we've been here a long time and thats all thats basically happened. The votes have been done and the decision has already been made.
0 post members will be removed shortly and automatic signups have been disabled, now they go through the admins for checking before being made active.
Just those 2 actions alone should make all the difference needed, if the egits pop up again despite the changes then the mods will just re-ban where necessary.
Thats it, thats what was decided on and thats what will happen, any further posts in this thread are basically now pointless.

perhaps if you were not such an arrogant cunt more genuine posters may have hung about?

You just keep carrying on and on and the more controversial the thread the better, especially the sock ones :p

Is flounce one-niner ready for take off? :D

It's about time you realised that stoking the troll fire and blowing the flames in my direction may seem clever, however not for those of us who know how such things are presented.
I was simply posting an idea on a thread about cleaning SZ in relation to socks trolls, as an idea, an idea that is not off topic, you're trolling my idea and you're presenting it as my issue, when the issue is all to clearly yours.

It's why I guess most of the others that came over from DIF about the same time as me, keep away from these threads, they don't want to be cyber bullied by old trolls to look like new trolls...

Your act is up.

btw if you think I'm going to be kissing your arse because I was voted unbanned you're badly mistaken, I owe you sir nothing.
This is where my bottom line would be if it existed.
Last Edit: 05 Mar 2014 01:28 by Blue_Tackler.
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:36 #116

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
Cat Nail File
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:38 #117

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91
Where's the issue with trolls atm?

Who's trolling?

:think:
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 04 Mar 2014 23:51 #118

  • Blue_Tackler
  • Blue_Tackler's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Long live the Queen!!!
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1453
  • Thank you received: 920
  • Karma: 0
oioioi wrote:
Where's the issue with trolls atm?

Who's trolling?

:think:

erm....

We were just talking over some possible scenarios that trolls might be seen/caught doing, it's like training.

:gn:
This is where my bottom line would be if it existed.
Last Edit: 04 Mar 2014 23:51 by Blue_Tackler.
You must register to post here.

SZ Spring Clean 05 Mar 2014 01:44 #119

  • Blue_Tackler
  • Blue_Tackler's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Long live the Queen!!!
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 1453
  • Thank you received: 920
  • Karma: 0
A441c142 465e 4949 B8c4 379140645642 Zpsc78b81b2
This is where my bottom line would be if it existed.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Space Bandit

SZ Spring Clean 05 Mar 2014 01:46 #120

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
It's ok tackler... somebody, someday, will love ya back :sokay:
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.201 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today118
Yesterday1224
Week2357
Month11340
Total1109764

Your IP Address: 216.73.217.145 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Wednesday, 19 August 2026 05:13

Who Is Online

Guests : 161 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel