Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
andyh wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
feather wrote:
Blue_Tackler wrote:
So what about the idea I proposed about having a new members sub forum, where they can be monitored and brought through?
Is it possible for SZ to create a subforum where new members can come to without them being able to post on the rest of SZ until approved?
Surely this could solve a lot of issues in one go, so what about it?
It could also be where other posters are restricted to when on a warning, and perhaps have limited pms etc?
Is such a level of posting restriction possible?
I think a moderated subforum for new members is the only answer.
I assume the existing members would also have access to this sub-forum / noobs nursery / ghetto, so I fail to see it's purpose.
To insulate the general membership? Do you propose the general members be locked out of that forum unless they are in orange overalls and on gruel rations at the time?
Imo anyone who is at the stage of needing their pm's restricted is passed the stage of needing their arse tossed on the kerb.
I propose that the 'arrivals thread' is joined by a 'new members general thread' In a newcomers sub forum.
Both of which can be accessed by new and existing members, new members will not have any other access to the rest of SZ until they have been seen as genuine for a period, this can be based on their posts towards existing members and other newcomers...
Once they have satisfied the general population then they could be included to the rest of SZ via being nominated by a member to the facilitators, perhaps we could say three nominations would be enough ?
Hardly going to stop them being a twat afterwards is it?
Well no but it's going to stop people that turn up to be disruptive, from accessing the main forum, I guess some would get through, but it's a measure to weed quite a lot out, tbh it's not working how it is if their turning up so often.
I assume a month in the arrivals sub forum if one existed, would provide existing members with an option to delete them, without keeping to have polls debates etc etc etc
Ummm no it wouldn't weed any out at all lol...
I'm not surprised feather has been critical tbh

I think it would, because that bored individual who wants to troll and criticise posts would have limited access until they've been approved, it means that they'd have to spend a lot of time behaving before they'd be able to misbehave thus, they would have wasted their time behaving, they would have spent perhaps a month behaving to then simply get banned, where presently they could turn up be chatty nice for a day or two and then start misbehaving.
But as I say it's only an idea, I think it would work, but obviously its not a popular idea.
or I'm not popular enough to have a popular idea...
didums
Alright then, enough pussyfooting with ya.
The community have had a vote (which YOU took part in) and we reached a majority on it.
Now it will get implemented.
Right now is not the time to be starting going on about some other ideas about what to do, the time to do that was back when the vote was implemented.
To continually get involved with these particular type threads with stuff thats not related to what we are doing at the time is actually known as trolling. And the sort of trolls we have biggest issue with eg merv or mike are only too patient enough to put up with a temporary sub-forum spell because they keep coming back again and again and again and again and the likes of myself and feather have been here for a hell of a long time, a LOT longer than yourself, which is why we are pissed off with your attitude and constant bullshit.
I'm beginning to wonder why we bothered voting you back in, you certainly don't appreciate it.
If you want some separate new ideas implementing then start a new vote on it in a new thread and fuck off trying to divert this one.
That will be all, kkggwpkthxetc.