thoreau wrote:
Yes!

Rick wrote:
You could be right there.

Its farcical the anti-semitism thats tolerated over there.

Nice to have you back Dub's

Rick wrote:
Yes, he's definitely one of the ringleaders. They all fawn over Tiny's documents.
really he's just another repeater of holocaust denial canards. They get debunked, then he brings it up again!

diamondgeezer wrote:
Considering antisemitism is a catchall phrase it's virtually impossible to discuss a wide range of issues without that label being applied, regardless of the argument or intent of the person presenting the information. Which is exactly the point behind the exploitation of the term. Most people dispensing that term fail to understand that they are performing a preprogrammed response while failing to factor in the information or the valid elements it may contain. No wonder the world is fucked - the pseudoscience of psychology built upon Freudian BS and social engineering policies, born out of the Fabian Society have been fundamental in undermining modern society and previously held social and moral values.

diamondgeezer wrote: I wouldn't say it's tolerated personally. Protected would be the word I'd use to describe it.

Space Bandit wrote:
Debunked by fact or fiction? Some people seem to have a hard time determining a distinction between the two!

Edit: WB Dubs.

Yeah but Frog, what we are repeatedly seeing over there is blatant hate speech against Jewish people under the guise of criticising 'zionism' or the foreign policies of Israel or holocaust denial or whatever.

Thats whats going on. Is David Icke happy with that kind of crap on his forum? One has to wonder...

Frog wrote: Ty for the WB
Do you think the tales recanted by Holocaust survivors are lies?

diamondgeezer wrote:
No the problem is peoples inability to be rational and discern for themselves what is a reasoned argument and what is purely intended as hatred. The whole thing is built on lies and BS just like the rest of the mind fuck! The Americans were playing the eugenics game at the same time as Hitler for example but it hardly gets compared with the situation in Germany. They are still doing it to this day under new names like social engineering etc. Same shit, same people different decade!

It's pretty difficult not to cross a line somewhere when discussing Zionists and Israel, seeing as one is using the Jewish faith as a shield (even if some may or may not even be Jewish), and the other is made up of a Jewish population willing to commit genocide on the Palestinians, and committing acts of aggression against their neighbors. Obviously no lesson was learned! Odd?

Frog wrote:
See this, I take issue with. I've seen no evidence whatsoever to suggest that the population of Israel speaks with one voice on such matters but I have seen evidence that not every Jewish person living in Israel or not is so willing....

dubmeup wrote:
Some of the witnesses have been proven to have lied...but I'm sure you know that already.

Frog wrote:
Some being the operative word

Frog wrote:
Indeed. The 'peoples' in this case being the DIF admin and mods.

Hence why the place is fucked and riddled with nazis.

dubmeup wrote:
I did that deliberately because I knew someone would come out with that. What evidence is there that everyone that questions the official story of the events at the WWII prison camps are all antisemitic?

I'm fully aware of the fact that not all the residents are in agreement with what the Israeli government does in their name - as the British government does very little in the name of most UK residents. How do you suggest people speak out against the atrocities committed by Israel without that having some fall out on the regular people? In the same way that criticism of the British implies we are all complicit with our government. There is no difference in my view unless you happen to be hyper sensitive for some reason.

I'm gonna stick my neck out....holocaust or no holocaust, Hitler was a cunt.

diamondgeezer wrote:
Both extremes are equally irrational in their thinking as with most things where extremes are present.

Frog wrote:
Well, for example he'd say 'where are the official documents for exterminating Jews'? (I've lost count of the amount of times it has been repeated.)
The relevant info gets posted up, annihilating his claim... he fucks off... then asks it again on other threads, or even later on in the same thread!
The same tactic is repeated by all the 'it's teh joos' mob on DIF - it's standard practice, amongst a myriad of other blatantly dishonest charades.

& welcome back dubbage!
I'll be the last to re-welcome you coz I know you were only seeking attention by 'leaving'!
Have a karma point anyway.

Space Bandit wrote:
I have read the threads and on occasion been foolish enough to take part in the odd one. The reason I got sucked in to those threads was due to the extreme views in opposition. Which are just as offensive with poor arguments. They are every bit as offensive as the alternative extreme.

Frog wrote: So you write something that is an unverifiable lie in order to get someone to point out what you wrote is an unverifiable lie as a tool to ask a completely different question........um.....ok. I'm sure I've come across this sort of thing before.
But hey, what the heck I'll answer the question anyway. There is no evidence I've seen to show that "everyone that questions the official story of the events at the WWII prison camps are all antisemitic". But then that isn't what's being suggested is it.
Can you write that in a way I can understand please?