feather wrote:
Yeah, technical things, maybe too much light or so feather.

I watch a few mins and it was dire technically, why the fuck dont they hire some inet proffesionals if the primary platform is going to be the web, the video looked shit.

chandrakavi wrote:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Organization_17_November

chandrakavi wrote: I'm sure that lighting effect was intended Chandra mate.
Total amateurish tech standards throughout.

Lighting was glary, sound was shit and the pixelated transmission was shocking.

On a slightly different note though.
Icke just babbled drivel. Busking it the entire time and I thought, "You've probably overstepped your limitations here son."
I doubt he will be able to hold an audience that up-close for long without them figuring the Emperor is nekkid.

feather wrote:
Maybe he'll have to take technical lessons or hints from AJ or anybody.
Let's hope they do it better in a few days.
If not it's Back to the Forum.
I think it would be better until they learned about it, to do it for a short period of time, 1or2 hours.
Let's wait feather.

Is it on now?

To be honest feather I would never have had you pegged as someone who would watch it .

Were you doing research

Couldn't give a damn mate,
I won't be watching it unless it's for the lols. (at them).

Do the people who gave him the £250,000 get their money back if it only stays on air for one month ?

dawnbreak wrote: lol see my last post.

They ran some thong-a-thon thing earlier where they were, (wait for it), hustling for more donations.
Chandra posted a link, I clicked on it and laughed a couple of times.

I did note they are planning to run a show by some psychic bint. (wooooooo)
Shame they never thought to consult her how much £££'s they would need to cobble this together before they put out the crowd source appeal.

Lol or maybe they did and that's why it's a financial clusterfuck.
How expensive is ectoplasm these days?

yes just clicked the link


I feel sorry for him in a way, he has convinced loads of people who probably couldn't afford it to give him money to start a television channel for him , which isn't actually on television just the internet,

Then his first broadcast is to ask for more money?

He is surely not that out of touch with things to think that you can run a state of the art studio. in London, with 9 state of the art cameras and roaming reporters on the back of a few thousand peoples £5 one of donations is he?

dawnbreak wrote:

umm no.....

Nor would they be reimbursed should Ofcom say............" " when the application lands on their desk.
I did catch the first DI bit where he announced that their lawyers had indeed told them they do need a license....Couldn't help but think, "surely you'd get that confirmed before you got folk to throw wedge at you?"

Could work a treat. License refused, kit sold off, money in bank, more victim stories for books for the next ten years......

Well I think he has got aspirations of TPV being on TV, I had some months ago pointed out on DIF bookshop, that according to D/I himself watching television induces a hypnotic like state and damages your thoughts, so how could he ever have a TV channel/station and hold that view without being some type of hypocrite?

knobmeup wrote:
It seemed logical for them to sort out licensing but it seems it was a bolt from the blue! Naive or what. Out of interest I emailed Ofcom about TPV in October - not to tell, honest but could it really have been down to me that Ofcom contacted TPV two weeks ago?! However, Ofcom weren't completely transparent in their reply. Regulation is also controlled by the Authority for Television on Demand and overall it looks like TPV is currently wading through bureaucratic shite.

why do you need a lisence from ofcom to have a website streaming video?

batou wrote: Because they're state approved so they can do what the fuck they want. Loads of torrent sites were purged and closed down recently:

www.zdnet.com/uk/21-new-torrent-sites-ad...ned-list-7000022604/

knobmeup wrote:
Since Icke seems to endorse the FMOTL, maybe they could have a go at the old 'statutes aren't law' trick & just start the channel without a licence. Why would they grovel for permission to do it? Just do a little dance & say a few magic words & courts & government just vanish!

Date as postmark


Dear Ofcom


Ref: Application for UK Broadcast Licence

Please find attached a video of our non-compliance dance.
Where is your God now?
Mauhauhau

Yours faithfully

Dancin' D Icke


p.s.
Money is bad, send us yours for safe disposal. xxx

that sucks wub.