feather wrote:
I genuinely couldn't give a shit if he's a mason or not.
He plagiarises others and talks absolute pish the rest of the time. That's all I need to know.
Not a big fan of the reptilian theory, then? Who is?
I think the trouble is that many people are being taken in by this pish. Icke, in my opinion, is working hard to bring in the global luciferian religion, like Blavatsky and Bailey did before him. The documentary Icke Debunked
youtube.com/watch?v=FbEgvx1qelw highlights the similarities between theosophy and Icke's pronouncements.
If these similarities, outlined in Icke Debunked, represent a real connection between them and the entities they channel, then the people who make up Icke's Ickeolytes that believe his "pish" are not awakened (as they claim) at all. They are being inducted into luciferianism.
The video is definitely worth a few watches despite its length. It contains many clips of Icke talking about his work (while flashing a sickening amount of hand signals, all conveniently excused by his followers as being because of arthritis), and quotes from Alice Bailey that show just how close Bailey and Icke are.
If Icke's material really is a repackaged theosophy (and it certainly looks it) then you would expect Icke to be a freemason, and the evidence that he is a freemason would appear to suggest that he is too. Unless of course that his masonic hand signs are actually down to arthritis and his masonic hand shakes are accidental, and the photo of him sitting in a masonic chair is a fake.
