entran­ger­mer­cen­ary wrote:


lmfao!!

diamondgeezer wrote:
hmm..ok, no big deal anyway.

you still haven't said whether you want me to post her pm to me, my reply(S), (there were two but it was more like the one in two halves)
I can retrieve the post i made to you on what I said to Jane that fired off her pm to me, the exchange I had with a mod on you kicking off about me posting the pm, when I didn't, I just said she has threatened to report my post to her barrister (which she had)
IF and that's a massive IF, this WAS all started by said person, I don't know, I don't have the facts here..and said person isn't here, I DON'T know them.. etc...

But I WILL say this...
A good-looking face can get away with murder, it happened to me. I married one. Just because someone comes across as handsome, good-looking and sweet.. doesn't mean they are.

By the way.. what on earth is that bleeping sound? I've seen fringe, I know what random bleeps can do.

banned wrote:
If you type that in to google you get the david icke forum.

Logical ya?

All we want here is for certain people to leave us alone. We are sick to death of DIF and personally I don't want to see any more discussion about it.

Merlin, DO fuck off... and anyone else who's still under the notion that Jane is behind all this. It's fucking laughable. At least try and get it right eh.

It's quite clear you had a problem with Jane but to continue insinuating this place all happened because of her is a crock of shit.

I've been here since the start and can assure anyone that I was never manipulated in general by the one you mentioned so take your crap and ram it. This has fuck all to do with Jane and everything to do with diamond, novum. frog and myself.

Call yourself intelligent? Do me a favour

"Tell me are you a Banned Fish too?..."

psketti wrote:
DO fuck off... and anyone else who's still under the notion that Jane is behind all this. It's fucking laughable. At least try and get it right eh.

ok, it was just something that needed clearing up. as iI said, I didn't/don't know all the facts so i will drop it. no need to tell me to fuck off though.
"everything to do with diamond, novum. frog and myself."

got it!

SShhhhhhh

bel wrote:
Sorry bel, wasn't directed at you at all. Never had an issue with you girl but I can see why you thought that. My post is directed over there, not here.

I'm just on a very short fuse at the moment and it's getting shorter by the day.

Apologies

Bel and Psketti c'mere ya daft buggers.

feather wrote:
Thanks feather.

Hope bel understands

psketti wrote:
Oh that's really ok.

What I need to learn through all this is to not pipe up on something i don't know the full facts on.

Thanks for the rose.

yep, I understand.

Thank you

banned wrote:
Icke has always pitched himself as it all being about 'finding the truth' and people 'awakening'. If Icke himself was preoccupied with how much traffic his forum was getting and if people were posting elsewhere, then he would be a hypocrite and a fraud. Because from everything he comes out with, who is posting on what internet forum and if it mentions him should be utterly irrelevant. He always says it's about getting information out. If some people are not happy with his forum and decide to meet and discuss the sort of things people discuss on there (and let people know tat other option is there) somewhere else rather than just vanish, I would have thought he should approve of that. But other people are repeatedly framing the issue in terms of some kind of competitive struggle of posters being 'recruited'. Making it ultimately about web traffic = about money. Are you saying to people that from Icke's perspective it's all about the money?

The vast majority of the stuff Icke comes out with is stuff he's just lifted from other people (and sometimes put his own slant on) anyway. He regurgitates conspiracy memes that in some cases have been kicking around for decades. I am sure he would say he is 'spreading information' and that that is the fundamental point.

bel wrote:

bel wrote: Hi Bel, I remember you putting up a facebook link to your profile for people to add you as friends, perhaps she got it from there, although it was before her registration she could have been lurking.

I didn't get off to the best start with Jane and she did PM me once as she thought I was asking too many questions which I was but it's because she didn't seem to give much away despite saying she knew things etc and me being nosey wanted to know. And she was a bit hot tempered at times but she helped me out in the end which I was grateful for.

@Bel,

Yep please do feel free to post what you like...there are no restrictions here in regards to posting the contents of those PM's if you wish to, as they aren't PM's associated with this forum.

You can either re-post that post you deleted earlier, or if you like I can just un-delete it as was for you.

Oh, and as for the odd bleeping sound...probably just Frog out back arsing about...

banned wrote:
Errr no she wasn't.

Where did you get that idea from?

diamond G....i didnt kna [former Liverpool football player] Ian Rush was into milk and cookies, but thanks to your avvy, I am now much more informed, thank you!

wildhorse wrote:
You insult the memory of Frank....