banned wrote:
Do you see adverts here for 'traffic' to pimp?

Do you see us banning people for giving each other personal info in pm's because we're worried about some other site?

All I see is paranoid guy worried about his 'TRAFFIC' cough...

All we want is to be left alone but he keeps bloody sending people over here in droves and whining to us about it!

There are no ads here , there is no 'competition', do you get it yet?



The more it carried on the more get curious and the more keep coming here, there's your TRUTH, now why don't you give it a rest?

banned, a lot of people had already swapped emails, phone numbers and met each other long before this all started.

banned wrote:
Well I never got phone numbers off anyone to invite them here I only got about three maybe four mobile numbers in total throughout the whole time I was there. All phone numbers were asked for/given out as I wasn't on the forum/internet every day so it made it easier for me to keep in contact with those people. One was for help with health, the others were due to potential meet ups.

banned wrote:
I was sent an email about this forum nothing by PM. I come and had a look, guess what, no fucking doom and gloom and a daily basis...good enough for me

So whats your concern if your not affiliated to the DI forum ??

andyh wrote:
Ok, well Sean has already stated that he will consider unbanning some members so long as they agree to not abuse the PM service.

So what is with all the conspiracy theories, all the big issues and accusations regarding Sean? if he wants to stop people using his PM service then that is his priority, why all the hostility over it?

End of the day, he has already stated the reasons he banned people and he has offered to unban people.

I do not see the problem, has he commited a criminal offence?

@banned - sean has given himself the right to ban anyone he wants for whatever reason he wants and if that reason is not stated in the rules then he changes the rules - which is cool - its his job - and that is the truth - he sees members as 'traffic' again from a business perspective I guess they are - it is rather insulting though - if he does not want people talking freely about other sites fair play like i said his job - his business - his wages - a consistency and non biased application of such wants would be awesome.

oioioi wrote:
Fuck me oioioi hes not the sharpest tool in the box

Read what you posted

banned wrote:
I have no goddamn idea!!

What are these conspiracy theories? Where is this hostility you speak of?

We're not interested in being 'unbanned' what gave you the idea we were?

andyh wrote:
So why are you all crying about how you do not know why you were all banned? it is becoming very confusing. Either you are all angry and upset about how Sean controls you and bans you, or you do not give a damn, is it both?

Some people say that they came here because they got banned, others openly admit on this same forum on different threads that they used the DIF PM service to recruit members.

So many different things being said

banned wrote:
I NEVER abused the PM service over at DIF. I broke no rules.
I've yet to hear the reasons why I was banned

banned wrote:
Do I look worried?
Look at my furrowed brow, look how really really concerned I am...
Look at how I am crying about my being banned...boohoo it was soooo terrible boohoooo!

lol

You expect everyone to come here for exactly the same reason?

Silverwand wrote:
Yeah Yeah, everyone gets a life sentence is innocent, didn't you know that

banned, why are taking this so seriously and personally?

Why bother coming here and posting?

I'm sure you have your reasons and it is admirable that you are being so defensive towards Sean, but he is a big boy and can stick up for himself

Are you aware of what he said to members here in chat a few days ago?

So....

If the DIF site is not to be used in any way for free advertising....then why was 7for allowed to carry on unchecked for a very long time with his own website as his siggy, and also spamming threads with the same spam?

only now is he banned

banned wrote: Do you need a hug wee man?

Your fingertips must be black and blue punching out all this pathetic pish.
Now why not trot back and get your bonio and belly scratch?

Don't worry, if you need a note saying you tried, we'll write one for you no problem.


Bless

banned wrote:
Surely mate you should be on the DI forum offering support over there

I mean they started a thread and its all ready on page 3 of the General section....Lets Support David Icke and his Website 13 replies including the OP Not even a 2 pager

www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=214651

banned wrote:
Look you wanted truth well that's what you are getting, I know what happened with my own account as does Sean and the mods over there, I never broke their rules, got no warnings, no points, no telling offs, no reason for being banned. Here's a screenshot of my account taken yesterday, at the end of the day you can believe what you like :

@banned... it seems like your getting gangbanged here so I only have one question.

If as you say, you have no affiliation with the DIF or the website, or Sean for that matter... how is it you seem to know so much about it or know what Sean is saying and so on and so forth?

Some people got banned and do not know why - some of those have some issues with that

Some may wish that they could be members of both places

Some want nothing more to do with the dif and would prefer to put their energy into this place

Me - well I don't like lies

We did not go to the dif and start this all up again - sean came here - told us it was going to 'end tonight' - stirring everything up again - most of the people that are here were or are banned/inactive on the icke site when he came over here shouting the odds and being rude - with no recourse to icke site pm's.

All of this is some twisted attempt to stop people coming here and to try to put out any flames caused by allegations - some founded and some unfounded that can be found on a plethora of sites around the web.

there was the belief on the part of the admin team that when people started complaining about the tone of the icke site that things would 'die down' so nothing changed - people got fed up with the tone so did the only thing left to them - they were the change.

We do not need to 'poach' members - so many people were fed up with the dif that they went inactive themselves or were just looking for an alternative - this is one of many alternatives - people are free to come or go as they choose

Is it not interesting that certain provocative members on both sides have since been banned?

Is it not interesting that it is only now since the inception of this place that sean has been canvassing for member feedback and 'allowing' people to air grievances?

Fingers crossed the dif will meet the needs of its community - thats all that I would like to see come from this - as many of its more vocal community are interested in a 'tone' that I am not - I am happy to not be there. And for those who feel similarly this place is available to them.

entran­ger­mer­cen­ary wrote: