thoreau wrote:
^This in my case.
What I can't understand is why sean has started a public thread on DIF about this forum and sent over dozens of members!?!?

Then what? Send over his mods to join up here and have a whine at us about it??

WTF is he smoking his curry now?

entran­ger­mer­cen­ary wrote:
It seems that sean is intent on taking the piss....theres a sticky thread called "alternative david icke forum" that was quickly scrambled up....but guess what...its jus a play on words...because.....hes only on about a sub forum and not this forum, but ....if peeps type in alternative DI forum into a search engine, hoping for this place, that link will also take you to that thread above this site.

How utterly fucking ridiculous.....

ego and control freakery is on the rise it seems

wildhorse wrote:
Hello Horse nice to see you

I bet truck drivers are used to being considered just 'traffic' eh?

A message to the DIF side...

Please, call me by my first name, Wild

ey up Merc

wildhorse wrote:
Well, just goes to show that everything evolves then doesn't it.

Pretty soon the DIF forum might also have a sub-forum were skeptics can even discuss issues revolving around David Icke. This is great, cannot wait, should be so enjoyable discussing those issues with tens of thousands of 'existing' DIF members, thanks for allerting me to this

banned wrote:


Maybe you need to look at the actual amount of traffic that actually post

Heres a tune for you and its catchy

[quote="banned" post=26202

Well, just goes to show that everything evolves then doesn't it.



Pretty soon the DIF forum might also have a sub-forum were skeptics can even discuss issues revolving around David Icke. This is great, cannot wait, should be so enjoyable discussing those issues with tens of thousands of 'existing' DIF members, thanks for allerting me to this [/quote]

Shows everything evolves? Hardly...it more likely shows a man who runs a website trying to get one over on another website because hes pissed off with them. Its as far from evolved as you can get....its something I would expect from "year 9 in IT class"

As for skeptics discussing, well...threads really need to be up for more than a nano second for people to read, process information, form an opinion, type that opinion and wait for 'discussion'. As it was, any mention of David Ickes motives and the thread ceased to exist

entran­ger­mer­cen­ary wrote:
Hhahahah merc... oh the fucking irony

You know not what you have done...

wildhorse wrote:
Shows everything evolves? Hardly...it more likely shows a man who runs a website trying to get one over on another website because hes pissed off with them. Its as far from evolved as you can get....its something I would expect from "year 9 in IT class"

As for skeptics discussing, well...threads really need to be up for more than a nano second for people to read, process information, form an opinion, type that opinion and wait for 'discussion'. As it was, any mention of David Ickes motives and the thread ceased to exist[/quote]

It is a learning process for everyone.

I think it is terrific what the DIF team are planning to do and it must be very difficult for a man to allow alternative debate on his own forum, but as a lot of the disruptors that derail threads have been weeded out, perhaps it will now be possible for 'all' of us to finally be able to discuss controversial issues in an adult manner and i personally cannot wait.

How many users does DIF currently have? well over 5 figures anyway.

Just a shame y'all cant come and enjoy the fun

banned wrote:
Well that's it for me , you clearly aint here for any other reason than to just imply we are liars and stir up trouble, Cheerio

Silverwand wrote:

banned wrote:
Whoa whoa whoa... pull up on the reins dude.

Did you not say, in pages back, that YOU had NO affiliation with the DIF? WTF are you on about? You speak as if you are a long term member and know the insides of it and how the webmaster feels... why? I asked earlier and you either did not see it or you ignored it, which can bring me to only one conclusion...your either a mod there or your Sean himself. If I am wrong, I invite you to prove it...

Your move, make it a good one because things in my head right now are all pointed at something I am sure others have already thought. May wish to control yourself and what you say because so far, from what I have read of your comments, your digging yourself a hole. It is nice to have a sort of debate here without name calling and people blowing their tops, which I do believe your trying to incite...but I would love to know what your game is.

banned wrote:

psketti wrote:
a lot of those giving 100% support have less than 10 posts lol

banned wrote:
It is a learning process for everyone.

I think it is terrific what the DIF team are planning to do and it must be very difficult for a man to allow alternative debate on his own forum, but as a lot of the disruptors that derail threads have been weeded out, perhaps it will now be possible for 'all' of us to finally be able to discuss controversial issues in an adult manner and i personally cannot wait.

How many users does DIF currently have? well over 5 figures anyway.

Just a shame y'all cant come and enjoy the fun [/quote]

Just a pity most of em aren't posting anymore...or they're all bloody well coming over here thanks to someone telling them about it.
Thanks a lot.

If KOTG comes over here I'm holding you personally responsible pal!!

StarsChildren wrote:
Prove it? what do you want? a link?

banned wrote:
What is wrong with you? Can't you comprehend what you read?

NONE of us would go back there if he fucking paid us too! What part of that aren't you getting?

What we have here is worth it's wait in gold due to the members. The DIF is worth it's weight in sponsers and traffic.

It's over blacky. Give it up and enjoy your stay here or fuck off back over there. Choice is yours mate.

banned wrote:
That is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo mod speak!

Be gone with you.