Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: david icke gets on my tits

Re: david icke gets on my tits 12 Jul 2012 23:41 #161

  • dawnbreak
  • dawnbreak's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • R.I.P DG xxx
  • Posts: 3533
  • Thank you received: 1198
  • Karma: 94
I AM ALL I AM wrote:
wake_up_bomb wrote:
... I will repeat: ...

Court transcript of Icke vs Adams
The Court = the judge
The Witness = David Icke

THE COURT: Wait; wait. You know, here, please. You're not helping yourself by doing this.

THE WITNESS: Okay, sorry.

THE COURT: You're going over the same thing over and over. I understand all that. Just listen carefully to his question; answer his question. Otherwise, here's the problem. You're going to be stuck here in St. Louis for the next week.

THE WITNESS: Okay. I understand.

THE COURT: I'm trying to give you the time so we can get this over by tomorrow. But the way you answer the questions, it's over and over and over. I got it -- I got it all a long time ago.

THE WITNESS: Okay
Last Edit: 12 Jul 2012 23:42 by dawnbreak. Reason: This is not an anti david icke fourm.
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 13 Jul 2012 21:23 #162

  • domathy
  • domathy's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 272
  • Thank you received: 57
  • Karma: 13
@ I AM ALL I AM.

Yes, vegan works well for me, but I do think the China study was flawed as it didnt study the affects of raw dairy. Personally I think people can be very healthy and avoid disease even if consuming a lot of unpasteurized dairy.

About Icke - He may well be an agent of the NWO, but I have yet to see compelling evidence.
He has been writing for over 20 years and been in public eye for longer than that - so there is plenty of opportunity to
dig for mistakes and flaws if you care to go looking for it. I just take what I like and leave the rest as it is not of interest to me.
I found his books interesting and he has never wronged me in any way - and so I have no problems with him. People say stuff like "David did this or David said that, and that's not very infinitely loving is it" - but I dont remember Icke ever claiming to be the source of infinite love. He just suggests that its good to be nice and respectful to eachother. does that mean he is always nice and respectful to people? NO! And just because he claims to have had spiritual experiences, does that mean he loses his right to be human and have human flaws?? NO, it doesnt. He is allowed to be human. I aspire to have a good diet, but somethimes slip up. I also have certain other values which sometimes i break - but its just called being human. And people say Icke never admits when he is wrong - but again, knowing what i know about his critics, If icke ever wrote or said anything in his books which he later regretted or it turned out to be wrong, could he ever admit it? NO. Because the critics would pounce and capitolize on it and he would never live it down. Again, I dont know if he is legitimate (and neither do you), I am just speaking the obvious here as belive in people having a fair trial.Maybe Icke is 60% right - but if his intentions are good then I dont care about the 40% as he is doing his best. 60% i still better than 0% which the mainstream media get each day. If he is a huckster then fuck him and I hope he gets whats coming to him - but until there is evidence, then he gets the benefit of any 'doubts'.
As for the reptillian stuff - it is just rediculous for you to say that you KNOW what is and what isnt possible/probable in this world where science understands less than 2% of this universe. Why would you assume that extra terrestrials would take a form which just happens to appeal to your logical mind? Pure arrogance there im afraid, and i dont mean that in a disrespectful way - Im just saying what I see. I am totally open to the idea that reptillians dont exist - but how the hell can anyone say they categorically do not exist? When I hear stuff like that the person saying it surrenders the right to be taken seriously. I have had subjective experiences which confim the existence of beings which exist beyond visible light - as have many many other people through out history. People on psychedellics commonly report seeing reptillian forms. So basically it is your logical mind, versus the experiences of maybe millions of other people - who may not specifically confirm Ickes views entirely, but do add weight to the idea that there are both benevolent as well as malevolent beings existing beyond physical light. You can dispute these experiences, but you will really need to jack shit if you dont want to be show the door, as there are some heavy weight writers out there who dont just spout spiritual woo-woo, and who have scientific minds, who talk about the above and deserve to be taken seriously.
If you have something objective about Icke himself, then i am all ears, but he has the right to believe what he wants about the nature of reality, as do you - without being attacked for it. :)
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 01:20 #163

  • humanspirit
  • humanspirit's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder
  • Rank4
  • Posts: 1736
  • Thank you received: 894
  • Karma: 21
Ive never read any of David Icke's books personally.
Could somebody point out some of his work where he has uncovered information that wasn't already known about?
I can here from a youngster that the system isn't fair so what is he saying that your average pleb hasn't already worked out?
Not lizard guff though.
naivety attracts evil and evil attracts naivety
Last Edit: 14 Jul 2012 01:21 by humanspirit.
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 03:07 #164

  • mushy
  • mushy's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 293
  • Thank you received: 74
  • Karma: 2000
humanspirit wrote:
Ive never read any of David Icke's books personally.
Could somebody point out some of his work where he has uncovered information that wasn't already known about?
I can here from a youngster that the system isn't fair so what is he saying that your average pleb hasn't already worked out?
Not lizard guff though.

anyone ?
anything ?
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 03:10 #165

  • mushy
  • mushy's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Junior Boarder
  • Rank2
  • Posts: 293
  • Thank you received: 74
  • Karma: 2000
who's going to see icke at wembley to learn stuff btw ?
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 03:31 #166

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
mushy wrote:
who's going to see icke at wembley to learn stuff btw ?

I have front row seats :coffee:
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 03:51 #167

  • Frog
  • Frog's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder 
  • Rank4
  • Government is simply a conspiracy against a nation!
  • Posts: 1305
  • Thank you received: 789
  • Karma: 82
psketti wrote:
mushy wrote:
who's going to see icke at wembley to learn stuff btw ?

I have front row seats :coffee:

Have you paid already? Have they actually settled on the final venue? Because they wont be filling the original venue proposed and I doubt they will even manage a brake even target. David Icke isn't a strong enough draw even among people who share some of his views. So who would actually part with money to purchase an over priced ticket to listen to someone who presents nothing new and has never attempted to offer solutions? People would be far better off attending one of the Lawful Rebellion meetings and meeting up with people who are proactive and offer real solutions. The ticket prices are anything from Free to about £20 where costs need to be met for the venue. There will be no lizard or artificial moon hogwash distracting or detracting from their message either. Anyone interested can get details here www.lawfulrebellion.org/new-events/ .
MyZone Page is your own personal web page which you can create right here on Sanctum Zone. It's dead easy! Why not check out the example https://sanctumzone.co.uk/myzone/Example/.

"Whenever you're in conflict with someone, there is one factor that can make the difference between damaging your...
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: LesleyPumpshaft

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 06:41 #168

  • domathy
  • domathy's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 272
  • Thank you received: 57
  • Karma: 13
Frog wrote:
psketti wrote:
mushy wrote:
who's going to see icke at wembley to learn stuff btw ?

I have front row seats :coffee:

Have you paid already? Have they actually settled on the final venue? Because they wont be filling the original venue proposed and I doubt they will even manage a brake even targete. David Icke isn't a strong enough draw even among people who share some of his views. So who would actually part with money to purchase an over priced ticket to listen to someone who presents nothing new and has never attempted to offer solutions? People would be far better off attending one of the Lawful Rebellion meetings and meeting up with people who are proactive and offer real solutions. The ticket prices are anything from Free to about £20 where costs need to be met for the venue. There will be no lizard or artificial moon hogwash distracting or detracting from their message either. Anyone interested can get details here www.lawfulrebellion.org/new-events/ .

Solutions? Clearly you never heard him speak, as he says people have to organize themselves and not comply with the system. What would people say if he was offering solutions? That he is trying to be a leader of a movement. Not to mention making himself a Target for inciting riots. He advocates civil disobedience, but that would be taken out of context, AP's would riot and he would take the flak. But ultimately he says civil disobedience aka LAWFULREBELLION is the way to crash the system. Shit its boring stating the obvious to you guys. And as for him repeating old info, well what new info is there to discuss ffs its still the age old conspiracy, which ever angle you take. New people to this 'scene' just want the overview which I think is what icke presents at his talks. And how do you know attendees won't be going to lawfulrebellion meetings too? Out of interest, what is your take on the moons anomalies?
Last Edit: 14 Jul 2012 06:47 by domathy.
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 07:55 #169

  • LesleyPumpshaft
  • LesleyPumpshaft's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • arse biscuits
  • Posts: 2060
  • Thank you received: 1010
  • Karma: 47
Frog wrote:
Have you paid already? Have they actually settled on the final venue? Because they wont be filling the original venue proposed and I doubt they will even manage a brake even target. David Icke isn't a strong enough draw even among people who share some of his views. So who would actually part with money to purchase an over priced ticket to listen to someone who presents nothing new and has never attempted to offer solutions? People would be far better off attending one of the Lawful Rebellion meetings and meeting up with people who are proactive and offer real solutions. The ticket prices are anything from Free to about £20 where costs need to be met for the venue. There will be no lizard or artificial moon hogwash distracting or detracting from their message either. Anyone interested can get details here www.lawfulrebellion.org/new-events/ .

Yup, that's why I'm not going, it's not just that, but also the price of travelling there. Thanks for the lawful rebellion link. Hopefully they'll do something in Bristol soon :)
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 08:32 #170

  • Frog
  • Frog's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder 
  • Rank4
  • Government is simply a conspiracy against a nation!
  • Posts: 1305
  • Thank you received: 789
  • Karma: 82
domathy wrote:
Solutions? Clearly you never heard him speak, as he says people have to organize themselves and not comply with the system. What would people say if he was offering solutions? That he is trying to be a leader of a movement. Not to mention making himself a Target for inciting riots. He advocates civil disobedience, but that would be taken out of context, AP's would riot and he would take the flak. But ultimately he says civil disobedience aka LAWFULREBELLION is the way to crash the system. Shit its boring stating the obvious to you guys. And as for him repeating old info, well what new info is there to discuss ffs its still the age old conspiracy, which ever angle you take. New people to this 'scene' just want the overview which I think is what icke presents at his talks. And how do you know attendees won't be going to lawfulrebellion meetings too? Out of interest, what is your take on the moons anomalies?

"Clearly I haven't heard him speak" humm that's a pretty dumb arsed statement! He does state that people should not comply with the system! Yet he complies with the system especially areas of the system which offer a cash reward. I thought Icke proclaimed he was free from worrying about what others think of him. Why does a solution require an incitement to violence? Are you saying that the only solution that Icke could put forward involve violent action? The issue isn't the fact that it's an age old conspiracy it's the fact that Icke has a tendency to sell himself as an original thinker, while he repeats the thoughts of people he has previously studied. He is a plagiarist. There will be people at the Lawful Rebellion meetings who are aware of Icke. They are the people who have moved on to something positive and proactive. What Luna anomalies would you be referring to?
LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
Yup, that's why I'm not going, it's not just that, but also the price of travelling there. Thanks for the lawful rebellion link. Hopefully they'll do something in Bristol soon :)

You're welcome. You can get details of what's happening in the Bristol area by contacting This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
MyZone Page is your own personal web page which you can create right here on Sanctum Zone. It's dead easy! Why not check out the example https://sanctumzone.co.uk/myzone/Example/.

"Whenever you're in conflict with someone, there is one factor that can make the difference between damaging your...
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: LesleyPumpshaft

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 08:37 #171

  • LesleyPumpshaft
  • LesleyPumpshaft's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • arse biscuits
  • Posts: 2060
  • Thank you received: 1010
  • Karma: 47
Thanks Frog, I just saw there's someone in Tewkesbury too :)
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 12:47 #172

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
domathy wrote:
Out of interest, what is your take on the moons anomalies?

Instead of reading Icke's stuff, try this:
www.amazon.co.uk/Built-Moon-Christopher-...id=1342266320&sr=1-1

Its mostly statistical stuff and a fair chunk is crap but it does have some relevant info.
Its important to understand then when we stupid humans examine the universe there are many things that seem statistically impossible ;)
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 13:50 #173

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
psketti wrote:
mushy wrote:
who's going to see icke at wembley to learn stuff btw ?

I have front row seats :coffee:

Sorry froggy, I was erm just joking :emb:
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 14:09 #174

  • I AM ALL I AM
  • I AM ALL I AM's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder
  • Rank4
  • Posts: 1407
  • Thank you received: 824
  • Karma: 59
domathy wrote:
@ I AM ALL I AM.

Yes, vegan works well for me, but I do think the China study was flawed as it didnt study the affects of raw dairy. Personally I think people can be very healthy and avoid disease even if consuming a lot of unpasteurized dairy.

G'day Domathy.

That's an interesting concept you have there. Basically, you think that a nutritional study (the world's largest ever conducted), of over 10,000 people, over a 20 year period, "was flawed as it didnt study the effects of raw dairy".

I'll leave this issue alone though, especially as it isn't on topic for this thread. Maybe we can discuss it in another thread sometime. :thumbup:

domathy wrote:
About Icke - He may well be an agent of the NWO, but I have yet to see compelling evidence.

What to you is "compelling evidence" ?

Do you allow that there is a possibility that there might not be "compelling evidence" for DI being a part of the NWO, yet there is "compelling evidence" showing DI does not 'walk his talk' ?

domathy wrote:
He has been writing for over 20 years and been in public eye for longer than that - so there is plenty of opportunity to dig for mistakes and flaws if you care to go looking for it.

Would that include DI making 'prophetic' claims that never eventuated ?

Like this documented example ? ...




Transcription of David Icke on a Republic of Ireland TV Show (part 1) wrote:... from the 10 second mark ...

Interviewer: And what must we do David ?

Icke: Well, therefore this energy is building up and its gotta be let out in a controlled fashion. It will be done with volcanoes and earthquakes, and you will know when the real big ones are under way when there is a massive event in Mount Rainer, which will happen very shortly in Washington State.

Interviewer: Washington ...

Icke: Right. Umm, ...

... from the 2 minute 11 second mark ...

Icke: On the other end of the spectrum you have the colour black, which is negativity, the very energy that's destroying the world, and if we wear black, we more efficiently absorb that and all the negative things ...

... from the 2 minute 58 second mark ...

Audience member: [question finalising with] Does it make the whole thing a sham, you know ? Does it make you a sham ?

Icke: It, it came out yesterday. All I can say as I said before, what else can I say apart from wait and see ... and if I was wanting to hoodwink people and all this business, I would say this is all going to happen in 10 years guys, just enough time for me to get 3 or 4 books out.

Interviewer: Are you saying this will happen ...

Icke: I am saying this is happening this summer. You can expect the massive, massive, event in Washington State to happen very, very soon.

Interviewer: How soon is very soon ? Like in the next month ? Give us a time limit.

Icke: The question of exactly when it happens is a question of when is the spirit of the Earth ... the Earth has a spirit too ... strong enough to take the tremendous ... ahhhh ... pressure of these events. Ahhhh, it has to happen this year. It has to happen this summer. Exactly when will depend on when the Godhead and all the other beings of light who are guiding this planet through these great changes, ummm, have said that the spirit of the Earth is strong enough to take it.


The events Icke describes in the interview never eventuate.
domathy wrote:
I just take what I like and leave the rest as it is not of interest to me.
I found his books interesting and he has never wronged me in any way - and so I have no problems with him.

Whether you, or anyone else, does or does not have a "problem with him" is irrelevant. That's a personal issue and therefore subjective.
domathy wrote:
People say stuff

Who are these "People" ?
domathy wrote:
like "David did this or David said that, and that's not very infinitely loving is it" - but I dont remember Icke ever claiming to be the source of infinite love. He just suggests that its good to be nice and respectful to eachother. does that mean he is always nice and respectful to people? NO!

So you freely admit that DI doesn't 'walk his talk'.

Interesting, because that is exactly what I have pointed out and which you appear to have an issue with me doing.

domathy wrote:
And just because he claims to have had spiritual experiences, does that mean he loses his right to be human and have human flaws?? NO, it doesnt. He is allowed to be human.

Being "human" is simply a description of the physical form that you are experiencing life through. You appear to be attaching more to it for some reason.

Would you please explain what you mean by "human" and "human flaws".

To be perfectly blunt, the "human flaws" part has overtones of the christian ideology of being a 'sinner', and all of the baggage that goes along with such an ideology.

domathy wrote:
I aspire to have a good diet, but somethimes slip up. I also have certain other values which sometimes i break - but its just called being human.

You are entitled to call it whatever you choose to call it. It doesn't change the fact that you are responsible for the choices (thoughts, actions, words) of your own self-expression. What you choose to put into your mouth is your responsibility alone and has nothing to do with "being human" ... unless you have attached some other meaning to "being human" ... which would require some clarification on your part.
domathy wrote:
And people say Icke never admits when he is wrong - but again, knowing what i know about his critics, If icke ever wrote or said anything in his books which he later regretted or it turned out to be wrong, could he ever admit it? NO. Because the critics would pounce and capitolize on it and he would never live it down.

Who are these "people" you keep making mention of and what relevance do they have to this discussion ?

And what do you "know about his critics" and who exactly are "his critics" ?

domathy wrote:
Again, I dont know if he is legitimate (and neither do you), I am just speaking the obvious here as belive in people having a fair trial.Maybe Icke is 60% right - but if his intentions are good then I dont care about the 40% as he is doing his best. 60% i still better than 0% which the mainstream media get each day. If he is a huckster then fuck him and I hope he gets whats coming to him - but until there is evidence, then he gets the benefit of any 'doubts'.

So, by stating that you "dont know if he is legitimate", does that mean that you have no "compelling evidence" to present that he is legitimate ?

The rest is a strawman argument.


A straw man is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.[1][2]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
domathy wrote:
As for the reptillian stuff - it is just rediculous for you to say that you KNOW what is and what isnt possible/probable in this world where science understands less than 2% of this universe.

Please provide a quote to support your claim that I have stated the above.

Smells like another strawman.

domathy wrote:
Why would you assume that extra terrestrials would take a form which just happens to appeal to your logical mind? Pure arrogance there im afraid, and i dont mean that in a disrespectful way - Im just saying what I see.

Again, please provide a quote to support your claim that I have stated the above.

It appears this is simply another strawman.

domathy wrote:
I am totally open to the idea that reptillians dont exist - but how the hell can anyone say they categorically do not exist? When I hear stuff like that the person saying it surrenders the right to be taken seriously.

Who has stated such and what does that have to do with this discussion ?

Do you also think that someone that doesn't take responsibility for their own thoughts, actions, words, "surrenders the right to be taken seriously" ?

Or do you think that those stating such aren't "being human" and aren't showing "human flaws" ?

It appears that you have one rule/standard for some people, and another rule/standard for others.

domathy wrote:
I have had subjective experiences which confim the existence of beings which exist beyond visible light - as have many many other people through out history.

Having "subjective experiences" is subjective and does not objectively "confirm" anything except that you had "subjective experiences". :roll:

The rest is an argumentum ad populum (an appeal to popularity).


In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it. In other words, the basic idea of the argument is: "If many believe so, it is so."

This type of argument is known by several names,[1] including appeal to the masses, appeal to belief, appeal to the majority, argument by consensus, consensus fallacy, authority of the many, and bandwagon fallacy, and in Latin as argumentum ad numerum ("appeal to the number"), and consensus gentium ("agreement of the clans"). It is also the basis of a number of social phenomena, including communal reinforcement and the bandwagon effect. The Chinese proverb "three men make a tiger" concerns the same idea.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
domathy wrote:
People on psychedellics commonly report seeing reptillian forms.

And ?

Is there a point to you stating this ?

If you'd like to know about why individuals taking entheogens often experience visions with snakes in them, I suggest you start with this thread and seriously think about reading the book that the thread is about ... www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2119 :thumbup:

domathy wrote:
So basically it is your logical mind, versus the experiences of maybe millions of other people - who may not specifically confirm Ickes views entirely, but do add weight to the idea that there are both benevolent as well as malevolent beings existing beyond physical light.

Argumentum ad populum again. Because "millions of other people" believe something, that doesn't mean that what they believe is true.

For instance, millions of children believe that 'Santa Claus' is real. From your position, we should all then believe that 'Santa Claus' is real. :roll:

I'd be interested to know whether you actually have any verifiable evidence that supports "Ickes views", because as it stands, DI himself hasn't even presented any verifiable evidence to support his views regarding 4th dimensional, blood-drinking, human-sacrificing, shape-shifting reptilians

domathy wrote:
You can dispute these experiences, but you will really need to jack shit if you dont want to be show the door, as there are some heavy weight writers out there who dont just spout spiritual woo-woo, and who have scientific minds, who talk about the above and deserve to be taken seriously.

Apart from the obvious strawman argument, you are also making an appeal to authority here.

Authoritative argument (also known as appeal to authority or argumentum ad verecundiam) is a special type of inductive argument which often takes the form of a statistical syllogism.[1]

Although certain classes of argument from authority do on occasion constitute strong inductive arguments, arguments from authority are commonly used in a fallacious manner.[1][2][3]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
domathy wrote:
If you have something objective about Icke himself, then i am all ears, but he has the right to believe what he wants about the nature of reality, as do you - without being attacked for it. :)

EDIT: Oooops, for some reason I missed this last bit.

I suggest that you read the original link that I posted to see all of the "objective" information, also known of as FACTS, to realise that no one is being "attacked".
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.
Unknown
Last Edit: 14 Jul 2012 14:36 by I AM ALL I AM.
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 14:13 #175

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
andyh wrote:
examine the universe there are many things that seem statistically impossible ;)
At one time I might have said "Lies, damn lies and...." but now share your humility regarding humankind and consider the imopossibilties that are revealed to is through science as the infinite beauty of the universe. :cool:

Science might indeed "get it wrong" but there are so many great scientists struggling to get it right, even in the face of their errors and the almost impossible task of learning about such vast and deep mysteries.

This is, in the Socratean sense at least, an expression of faith and love of truth.

Of course, somebody like me would say that this also holds true of spiritual truth.
thank you St Jude for favours granted
Last Edit: 14 Jul 2012 14:43 by mikey mikey.
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 15:33 #176

  • andyh
  • andyh's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Rank6
  • Posts: 10337
  • Thank you received: 3545
  • Karma: 62
mikey mikey wrote:
andyh wrote:
examine the universe there are many things that seem statistically impossible ;)
At one time I might have said "Lies, damn lies and...." but now share your humility regarding humankind and consider the imopossibilties that are revealed to is through science as the infinite beauty of the universe. :cool:

Science might indeed "get it wrong" but there are so many great scientists struggling to get it right, even in the face of their errors and the almost impossible task of learning about such vast and deep mysteries.

This is, in the Socratean sense at least, an expression of faith and love of truth.

Of course, somebody like me would say that this also holds true of spiritual truth.

Science IS spiritual imho as it rejects a truth that is forced by dogma handed down by rulers.
Its just a pity that a lot of so called scientists don't actually follow the scientific method and viewpoint and end up wallowing in dogma all over again ;)
“Fascists are not human. A snake is more human.” - Hugo Chávez
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: oioioi

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 16:09 #177

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
andyh wrote:
Science IS spiritual imho

Yes. Indeed it is. Especially the pure sciences, rather then the technology/design of gadgets or the "social sciences". Science, imho is infinitely more sublime and spiritual because it lifts us out of oureslves to observe the beauty of the universe from the atomic level to the astronomical.

In fact CS LEwis points this out marvelously through Screwtape (who would bring us down).
“Above all, do not attempt to use science (I mean, the real sciences) as a defence against Christianity. They will positively encourage him to think about realities he can’t touch and see. There have been sad cases among the modern physicists. If he must dabble in science, keep him on economics and sociology; don’t let him get away from that invaluable “real life.” But the best of all is to let him read no science but to give him a grand general idea that he knows it all and that everything he happens to have picked up in casual talk and reading is “the results of modern investigation.”
thank you St Jude for favours granted
Last Edit: 14 Jul 2012 16:13 by mikey mikey.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: oioioi

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 21:16 #178

  • domathy
  • domathy's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 272
  • Thank you received: 57
  • Karma: 13
I AM ALL I AM wrote:
domathy wrote:
@ I AM ALL I AM.

Yes, vegan works well for me, but I do think the China study was flawed as it didnt study the affects of raw dairy. Personally I think people can be very healthy and avoid disease even if consuming a lot of unpasteurized dairy.

G'day Domathy.

That's an interesting concept you have there. Basically, you think that a nutritional study (the world's largest ever conducted), of over 10,000 people, over a 20 year period, "was flawed as it didnt study the effects of raw dairy".

I'll leave this issue alone though, especially as it isn't on topic for this thread. Maybe we can discuss it in another thread sometime. :thumbup:

domathy wrote:
About Icke - He may well be an agent of the NWO, but I have yet to see compelling evidence.

What to you is "compelling evidence" ?

Do you allow that there is a possibility that there might not be "compelling evidence" for DI being a part of the NWO, yet there is "compelling evidence" showing DI does not 'walk his talk' ?

domathy wrote:
He has been writing for over 20 years and been in public eye for longer than that - so there is plenty of opportunity to dig for mistakes and flaws if you care to go looking for it.

Would that include DI making 'prophetic' claims that never eventuated ?

Like this documented example ? ...




Transcription of David Icke on a Republic of Ireland TV Show (part 1) wrote:... from the 10 second mark ...

Interviewer: And what must we do David ?

Icke: Well, therefore this energy is building up and its gotta be let out in a controlled fashion. It will be done with volcanoes and earthquakes, and you will know when the real big ones are under way when there is a massive event in Mount Rainer, which will happen very shortly in Washington State.

Interviewer: Washington ...

Icke: Right. Umm, ...

... from the 2 minute 11 second mark ...

Icke: On the other end of the spectrum you have the colour black, which is negativity, the very energy that's destroying the world, and if we wear black, we more efficiently absorb that and all the negative things ...

... from the 2 minute 58 second mark ...

Audience member: [question finalising with] Does it make the whole thing a sham, you know ? Does it make you a sham ?

Icke: It, it came out yesterday. All I can say as I said before, what else can I say apart from wait and see ... and if I was wanting to hoodwink people and all this business, I would say this is all going to happen in 10 years guys, just enough time for me to get 3 or 4 books out.

Interviewer: Are you saying this will happen ...

Icke: I am saying this is happening this summer. You can expect the massive, massive, event in Washington State to happen very, very soon.

Interviewer: How soon is very soon ? Like in the next month ? Give us a time limit.

Icke: The question of exactly when it happens is a question of when is the spirit of the Earth ... the Earth has a spirit too ... strong enough to take the tremendous ... ahhhh ... pressure of these events. Ahhhh, it has to happen this year. It has to happen this summer. Exactly when will depend on when the Godhead and all the other beings of light who are guiding this planet through these great changes, ummm, have said that the spirit of the Earth is strong enough to take it.


The events Icke describes in the interview never eventuate.
domathy wrote:
I just take what I like and leave the rest as it is not of interest to me.
I found his books interesting and he has never wronged me in any way - and so I have no problems with him.

Whether you, or anyone else, does or does not have a "problem with him" is irrelevant. That's a personal issue and therefore subjective.
domathy wrote:
People say stuff

Who are these "People" ?
domathy wrote:
like "David did this or David said that, and that's not very infinitely loving is it" - but I dont remember Icke ever claiming to be the source of infinite love. He just suggests that its good to be nice and respectful to eachother. does that mean he is always nice and respectful to people? NO!

So you freely admit that DI doesn't 'walk his talk'.

Interesting, because that is exactly what I have pointed out and which you appear to have an issue with me doing.

domathy wrote:
And just because he claims to have had spiritual experiences, does that mean he loses his right to be human and have human flaws?? NO, it doesnt. He is allowed to be human.

Being "human" is simply a description of the physical form that you are experiencing life through. You appear to be attaching more to it for some reason.

Would you please explain what you mean by "human" and "human flaws".

To be perfectly blunt, the "human flaws" part has overtones of the christian ideology of being a 'sinner', and all of the baggage that goes along with such an ideology.

domathy wrote:
I aspire to have a good diet, but somethimes slip up. I also have certain other values which sometimes i break - but its just called being human.

You are entitled to call it whatever you choose to call it. It doesn't change the fact that you are responsible for the choices (thoughts, actions, words) of your own self-expression. What you choose to put into your mouth is your responsibility alone and has nothing to do with "being human" ... unless you have attached some other meaning to "being human" ... which would require some clarification on your part.
domathy wrote:
And people say Icke never admits when he is wrong - but again, knowing what i know about his critics, If icke ever wrote or said anything in his books which he later regretted or it turned out to be wrong, could he ever admit it? NO. Because the critics would pounce and capitolize on it and he would never live it down.

Who are these "people" you keep making mention of and what relevance do they have to this discussion ?

And what do you "know about his critics" and who exactly are "his critics" ?

domathy wrote:
Again, I dont know if he is legitimate (and neither do you), I am just speaking the obvious here as belive in people having a fair trial.Maybe Icke is 60% right - but if his intentions are good then I dont care about the 40% as he is doing his best. 60% i still better than 0% which the mainstream media get each day. If he is a huckster then fuck him and I hope he gets whats coming to him - but until there is evidence, then he gets the benefit of any 'doubts'.

So, by stating that you "dont know if he is legitimate", does that mean that you have no "compelling evidence" to present that he is legitimate ?

The rest is a strawman argument.


A straw man is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.[1][2]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
domathy wrote:
As for the reptillian stuff - it is just rediculous for you to say that you KNOW what is and what isnt possible/probable in this world where science understands less than 2% of this universe.

Please provide a quote to support your claim that I have stated the above.

Smells like another strawman.

domathy wrote:
Why would you assume that extra terrestrials would take a form which just happens to appeal to your logical mind? Pure arrogance there im afraid, and i dont mean that in a disrespectful way - Im just saying what I see.

Again, please provide a quote to support your claim that I have stated the above.

It appears this is simply another strawman.

domathy wrote:
I am totally open to the idea that reptillians dont exist - but how the hell can anyone say they categorically do not exist? When I hear stuff like that the person saying it surrenders the right to be taken seriously.

Who has stated such and what does that have to do with this discussion ?

Do you also think that someone that doesn't take responsibility for their own thoughts, actions, words, "surrenders the right to be taken seriously" ?

Or do you think that those stating such aren't "being human" and aren't showing "human flaws" ?

It appears that you have one rule/standard for some people, and another rule/standard for others.

domathy wrote:
I have had subjective experiences which confim the existence of beings which exist beyond visible light - as have many many other people through out history.

Having "subjective experiences" is subjective and does not objectively "confirm" anything except that you had "subjective experiences". :roll:

The rest is an argumentum ad populum (an appeal to popularity).


In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it. In other words, the basic idea of the argument is: "If many believe so, it is so."

This type of argument is known by several names,[1] including appeal to the masses, appeal to belief, appeal to the majority, argument by consensus, consensus fallacy, authority of the many, and bandwagon fallacy, and in Latin as argumentum ad numerum ("appeal to the number"), and consensus gentium ("agreement of the clans"). It is also the basis of a number of social phenomena, including communal reinforcement and the bandwagon effect. The Chinese proverb "three men make a tiger" concerns the same idea.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
domathy wrote:
People on psychedellics commonly report seeing reptillian forms.

And ?

Is there a point to you stating this ?

If you'd like to know about why individuals taking entheogens often experience visions with snakes in them, I suggest you start with this thread and seriously think about reading the book that the thread is about ... www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2119 :thumbup:

domathy wrote:
So basically it is your logical mind, versus the experiences of maybe millions of other people - who may not specifically confirm Ickes views entirely, but do add weight to the idea that there are both benevolent as well as malevolent beings existing beyond physical light.

Argumentum ad populum again. Because "millions of other people" believe something, that doesn't mean that what they believe is true.

For instance, millions of children believe that 'Santa Claus' is real. From your position, we should all then believe that 'Santa Claus' is real. :roll:

I'd be interested to know whether you actually have any verifiable evidence that supports "Ickes views", because as it stands, DI himself hasn't even presented any verifiable evidence to support his views regarding 4th dimensional, blood-drinking, human-sacrificing, shape-shifting reptilians

domathy wrote:
You can dispute these experiences, but you will really need to jack shit if you dont want to be show the door, as there are some heavy weight writers out there who dont just spout spiritual woo-woo, and who have scientific minds, who talk about the above and deserve to be taken seriously.

Apart from the obvious strawman argument, you are also making an appeal to authority here.

Authoritative argument (also known as appeal to authority or argumentum ad verecundiam) is a special type of inductive argument which often takes the form of a statistical syllogism.[1]

Although certain classes of argument from authority do on occasion constitute strong inductive arguments, arguments from authority are commonly used in a fallacious manner.[1][2][3]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
domathy wrote:
If you have something objective about Icke himself, then i am all ears, but he has the right to believe what he wants about the nature of reality, as do you - without being attacked for it. :)

EDIT: Oooops, for some reason I missed this last bit.

I suggest that you read the original link that I posted to see all of the "objective" information, also known of as FACTS, to realise that no one is being "attacked".

1) yes, raw dairy is a totally different substance. There are tribes in africa who drink litres of raw milk per day and have no heart disease, osteoporosis or other problems often attributed to dairy. But yes, thats a discussion for another time.
2) I think Icke said " 00:27: we need to love eachother in order to disperse the negative energy to stop the earthquakes happening" So yeah, thats clearly why that earthquake never happened - we must have loved eachother sufficiently to avert disaster :chuckle: . (he hedged his bets there in case you didnt notice) But has Icke got stuff wrong? Yes(more so in the early days when he was 'unstable') Has he got lots right? yes. Is he an agent of the NWO? We dont now.
3) true, it is subjective. But unless you have real reson to believe he is an agent, or you can prove reptillians dont exist - then really you are just a person wasting time being annoyed with a man who is just sharing beliefs with other people (who else do you have n your black book out of interest?)
4) Many people have.
5) I still dont even understand how he doesnt walk his talk? Is he a rapist? Does he kill kittens? How does he impose his will on others? He says we should do what we want, as long as we dont impose our will on others. Persoanly, I would say his behaviour has been exemplary - especially after the entire human population of this country used to point and laugh at him for about ten years (non stop playground bullying) plus needing to push against a never ending tide of retardation. If I were him, probably anger would have got the better of me more often. He say be decent people and to take a stand - not to be Jesus, so maybe try to let that sink in before moving on to the next point.
6) see point 5 I suppose, as Im trying to keep on topic and Im not really sure what behaviour of Icke that Im trying to defend. You say he doesnt walk his talk - but Im not even sure what you mean (beyond just him being a normal human)
7) Im saying that although the end doesnt justify the means, its what's on balance at the end of the day that counts. I'd rather be a flexible person and use my intuition along the way (and learn from mistakes along the way and grow accordingly) than to be a ridgid minded person who follows the 10 commandments or ticks all the right vegan/ethical boxes - but who is a total miserable cock and someone just following dogma just so I can qualify as being a 'good person'. Its the ones who dont make mistakes that often you need to watch out for.
8) the generic critics with their generic criticisms.
9) everything is subjective, including hard science. einstein said everything is an illusion, albeit a persistent one.
10) You are dodging what I said about reptillians
11) " "

My eyes are getting tired now. But all im saying is you dont know about reptillians and you dont have evidence of Icke really being a nasty human being (ie not walking talk??). So, dont take me wrong - I dont know you and I dont know what you know about Icke.
If you think that Icke needs to behave like Jesus, then Ill leave you to it - but plenty can read between the lines and see he is just a bloke.
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 14 Jul 2012 21:30 #179

  • domathy
  • domathy's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 272
  • Thank you received: 57
  • Karma: 13
Frog wrote:
domathy wrote:
Solutions? Clearly you never heard him speak, as he says people have to organize themselves and not comply with the system. What would people say if he was offering solutions? That he is trying to be a leader of a movement. Not to mention making himself a Target for inciting riots. He advocates civil disobedience, but that would be taken out of context, AP's would riot and he would take the flak. But ultimately he says civil disobedience aka LAWFULREBELLION is the way to crash the system. Shit its boring stating the obvious to you guys. And as for him repeating old info, well what new info is there to discuss ffs its still the age old conspiracy, which ever angle you take. New people to this 'scene' just want the overview which I think is what icke presents at his talks. And how do you know attendees won't be going to lawfulrebellion meetings too? Out of interest, what is your take on the moons anomalies?

"Clearly I haven't heard him speak" humm that's a pretty dumb arsed statement! He does state that people should not comply with the system! Yet he complies with the system especially areas of the system which offer a cash reward. I thought Icke proclaimed he was free from worrying about what others think of him. Why does a solution require an incitement to violence? Are you saying that the only solution that Icke could put forward involve violent action? The issue isn't the fact that it's an age old conspiracy it's the fact that Icke has a tendency to sell himself as an original thinker, while he repeats the thoughts of people he has previously studied. He is a plagiarist. There will be people at the Lawful Rebellion meetings who are aware of Icke. They are the people who have moved on to something positive and proactive. What Luna anomalies would you be referring to?
LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
Yup, that's why I'm not going, it's not just that, but also the price of travelling there. Thanks for the lawful rebellion link. Hopefully they'll do something in Bristol soon :)

You're welcome. You can get details of what's happening in the Bristol area by contacting This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

We ALL comply with the system to some degree. I pay car tax and fuel VAT - but if my fellow humans got off their ass too, I would stop doing so in a flash. I might feel a bit alone if i decided to not pay my car tax to try and make a point (not because I "care about what the DVLA might think of me", but because they have the power to cause me huge inconvenience under the current system. So we all have to play their game to some degree, until the day comes that we ALL dont)
Yes, he says people should refuse to pay their mortgage en masse etc. But if he started trying to organize people into groups and take action on things, all that would be needed is a few agent provocateurs, some media coverage (problem, reaction, solution) and the solution would be to shut Icke down. So he says we have to figure it out ourselves. which brings me to the next point, which is that yes, people read his books and move on. Ickes work is primary school/first grade stuff, and people have enough and move on. I dont see how that is negative. If people read Icke,, then felt motivated to get off their ass and go to a lawful rebellion group then its a mission accomplished. Or even if they thought he was a shill so went to a lawful rebellion group for mor substance - then its still mission accomplished. Either way, icke gets peoples feet in the door of 'questioning everything' (including questioning him) and the fact remains, he introduces the most number of people to investigating the nature of reality.

This is the moon stuff (just notes im afraid but you get the jist)
Irregularities:
Moon is too big and too far out.
Moon has such shallow craters.
How can the moon sustain its bulge.
Age of moon rocks.
Moon is inside out.
Mysteries of Maria and Mascons.
Dry as dust-but there are clouds of water vapour erupting from the surface.
Moon vibrates like a gong.


Spaceship moon
The moon is bigger and lighter in mass than it should be, it’s massive. It should be about 30 miles in diameter-but is 2160.

No magnetic field-yet rocks are magnetized. Large circular areas of high density and higher gravitational pull-once believed to be oceans, appear artificial, very few on dark side of moon.

Rocks on the moon of 4.5 billion years old-that's 1 billion years old than the Earth, said the whack theory does not make sense and the Earth has all the iron and the moon has none.

Coincidences
The moon is 400 times smaller than the Sun, at the solar eclipse is 400 times closer to the Earth-this makes the moon appear the same size as the sun. When the sun is at its lowest/weakest, the moon is at its highest/brightest. Both set at the same point on the horizon at the equinoxes and opposite points at solstices. We never see the dark side due to synchronicity of the moons rotation-it rotates on its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit the Earth. Very slow rotation-one turnover every 27 Earth turns. The Earth rotates 400 times faster than the moon and turns 40,000 km on its axis in a day to the moons 400 turns. Earth spins 366 times in one solar orbit and polar circumference of the Earth is 366 times bigger than the moon. Circumference of the moon is 27% the size Earth and the Moon makes 27 turns per orbit of Earth,.

Multiply circumference of moon by that of Earth= 436, 669, 140KM. Divide by hundred= 436, 669-the circumference of the Sun which is correct to 99.9%. Divide circumference of the Sun by that of the moon x 100 = circumference of the Earth. Divide the size of the Sun by the size of the Earth and x 100= size of the moon.
Precision of the proverbial Swiss watchmaker.

Moon, Earth and Sun encoded with unit of measurement called the megalithic yard. I.e. used for measuring stone circles etc.

Structures were built to observe movements of Sun/moon etc-but how would they know the circumference?

Hollow moon
It is known that the core is far less dense than the outer layers-it may have no core at all. But a natural satellite cannot be hollow.

It has only 60% the density of the Earth. The moon may not have a core or is partially hollow.

They crashed a lunar module causing impact equal to 1 tons of TNT. Shockwaves built up for 8 mins- moon rang like a bell 30 min. Another module equal to 11 tons of TNT-the moon reacted like a gong-vibrated for three hours and 20 min to a depth of 25 km. The moon wobbled very precisely as if it had big hydraulic dampers struts. The moon was hit by a meteor equivalent 200 tons of TNT-massive shockwaves deep into the interior...... but none came back!!

The outer surface of the moon is very hard and has minerals like titanium. Moon rocks contained processed metals including brass and Mica, and elements uranium 236 (radioactive waste found in spent nuclear fuel and reprocessed uranium) Neptunium 237-byproduct of nuclear reactors-neither are ever found naturally. They also found iron particles that never rust-that doesn't happen naturally.

The moon is a spacecraft
Hollowed out using nuclear drills and poured radioactive metallic slag onto the surface.

Artificial Sputnik
Filled with fuel and machinery. The hull is supertough-double layered and 20 mile thick-then a loosely packed covering (about 3 miles thick) where the lunar seas and craters are- in some cases non-existent.

The moon is inside out. The outer layer is tough-hence why craters are so shallow. The outer layer acts as a buffer. Rocks contain titanium, chromium, and zirconium-refractory and mechanically strong and anticorrosive properties. Very resistant to heat and wear. From an engineer's point of view, superb construction.

10 x titanium as Earth rocks. Maria Plains are the size of Texas and covered with fluid titanium. (Protective coating was damaged and repaired with liquid titanium.)

The age of the moon dust can be explained by space travels of the moon.

Large bulge on dark side-the immense hull of a spaceship.

Unexplained eruptions of water vapor i.e. there is an atmosphere that sustains life inside.



The death Star
The moon and phobos= spaceship/base/modus operandi of the reptilians.
Water and resources taken from the Earth to moon and Mars. Zulus confirm this.
Sumerian accounts of Anunaki say they came to mine gold. There is no gold in Fort Knox-just tungsten blanks.
Arrival of the moon ended the golden age-ancients blame the serpent gods.
War in the heavens-planets between Mars and Jupiter was destroyed to become asteroid belt, solar system totally disrupted. The Earth turned over i.e. when moon Drew close and moved again to adjust its position. Created seasons-hence 'gods talk to people about the seasons'(why would we need to be taught?)
The placement of the moons dictate the speed of Earth rotation and angle at which it rotates-22.5° from vertical. This angle create the four seasons (before the moon there were no seasons)-influences the tides and the water in our bodies too.
Dictate our relationship to time. Months= moonths i.e. based on moon cycles.

Humans are from Orion
from a world among the stars. A paradise world with red rocks, Earth, sand, seas. Credo says is the real Garden of Eden-survivors banished for their greed and lust after a war between man and woman. Zulus call planet Matfieng/Lord of the flies-insulting depiction of the survivors (Beelzebub also Lord of the flies) survivors were brought here in the moon.

Calling cards of the gods.
There are lots of unexplained structures on the moon-a 'bridge'12 miles long. Hundred 50 obelisks-huge shadows cast by spires. Others are taller than the tallest buildings on earth-two or three times taller and much lighter in colour than surrounding lava fields.

Strange lights on moon. Astronauts reported object 25,000 mph heading to moon emitting radio signals.

Moon base.
Photographer "discovered a base on the back side of the moon, geometrical shapes/towers, spherical buildings, tall towers at radar dishes. Some structures half a mile in size. Some look like cooling towers. Some are very straight and tall with flat roof. Some were round and domed structures and new UFOs get airbrushed out. (Not a base, but it's an entrance to the moon)

The moonsters
reptilian headquarters. Also have interdimensional portal that allows fourth density reptilians to enter third density. Then via spacecraft/teleport-still cocooned from third density, two locations under the Earth. The third density reptilians are part of this too. Genetic manipulation experiments with abductees, also genetically manipulated royal bloodlines at the moon.

Monarchy/moonarchy.


The fake moon landing
secret government including ex-Nazis longer have access to flying saucer technology.

The first moon landing was a total fraud. An Exposé says Kubrick directed the 1969 moon landings in a studio. Kennedy was shown flying saucer technology after his election and realise potential for other uses i.e. cheap benign energy for everyone. Soon after JFK made a speech asking NASA to land a man on the moon before the decade was out-ploy to get them to release technology to fulfil the vision.

In return Kubrick negotiated unlimited budget for 2001 space Odyssey (and allowed to make any film he wants with no oversight). Same special effects and visual anomalies seen in moon landings and space Odyssey.
Long list of contradictions in lighting etc. He purposely included anomalies so the truth would later be uncovered.

Kubrick died in 1999 after showing 'eyes wide shut'to Warner Brothers. Tom Cruise/Kidman-story of Satanic mind control. Film release date was 16th of July 1999-30 years to the day after moon landing.


Ancient confirmation
Moon='chariot' of the gods/Goddess.
Zulu say the moon is hollow and home of the Python and moon was brought here 100 generations ago by two brothers (corresponds with Anunaki - Enki&Enlil) Zulus say the brothers stole the moon in the form of an egg from a great fire dragon and emptied out the yoke.
Semiramis came from the moon in an egg that fell into the Euphrates at the time of the first full moon after the spring equinox.

Reptilians created by the Sun to cause havoc for creation 'given authority to really mess things up in the universe'. Change rotation and angle of Earth 'Earth turned over'. Brought tidal systems, women didn't menstruate before. Moon stops Earth getting too fertile and moon/Earth in a silent war.' The moon, out of jealousy is a bad sister'. Reptilians threatened to take the moon away if humans didn't do what they are told.

Before the moon there were no seasons and the planet was permanently surrounded by Canopy of water vapor. People did not feel the fierce glare of the sun and could only see it through a watery mist. That was beautiful, a gentle place, lush and green and the fury of the Sun was not there. Then the water canopy fell to Earth as a deluge of rain when the moon came.

The moon was the Ark in the Bible where new genetic material was saved-an new post-flood, genetically manipulated version of man went forth.

Reptilians manipulate from the moon where the Python lives-accounts warned to never upset the moon. The sun is forgiving but never the moon. Moon was built faraway to travel the universe.
Accounts :Reptilians come to earth in saucers. Moon is a 'magician'.
Accounts say reptilians come to Earth at the full moon when Satanic rituals abound and legends say people become vampires and werewolves.
Last Edit: 14 Jul 2012 21:32 by domathy.
You must register to post here.

Re: david icke gets on my tits 15 Jul 2012 00:25 #180

  • Frog
  • Frog's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Expert Boarder 
  • Rank4
  • Government is simply a conspiracy against a nation!
  • Posts: 1305
  • Thank you received: 789
  • Karma: 82
psketti wrote:
psketti wrote:
mushy wrote:
who's going to see icke at wembley to learn stuff btw ?

I have front row seats :coffee:

Sorry froggy, I was erm just joking :emb:

I know I was using artistic license in my response to you. :chuckle:
MyZone Page is your own personal web page which you can create right here on Sanctum Zone. It's dead easy! Why not check out the example https://sanctumzone.co.uk/myzone/Example/.

"Whenever you're in conflict with someone, there is one factor that can make the difference between damaging your...
You must register to post here.
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.437 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today1365
Yesterday2000
Week5604
Month14587
Total1113011

Your IP Address: 216.73.216.10 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Thursday, 20 August 2026 10:27

Who Is Online

Guests : 143 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel